World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eva Ceulemans

Eva Ceulemans

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
5959
World Ranking
8295
National Ranking
119

Eva Ceulemans publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Ceulemans sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 250 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eva Ceulemans D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Ceulemans sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Parenting Styles: A Closer Look at a Well-Known Concept

    Sofie Kuppens;Sofie Kuppens;Eva Ceulemans

  • Assessing Temporal Emotion Dynamics Using Networks

    Laura Bringmann;Madeline L Pe;Nathalie Vissers;Eva Ceulemans

  • Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice

    Laura F. Bringmann;Casper Albers;Claudi Bockting;Denny Borsboom

  • Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience

    Peter Kuppens;Iven Van Mechelen;Dirk J. M. Smits;Paul De Boeck

  • Negative emotion differentiation: Its personality and well-being correlates and a comparison of different assessment methods

    Yasemin Erbas;Eva Ceulemans;Madeline Lee Pe;Peter Koval

  • Modeling affect dynamics: State-of-the-art and future challenges

    E.L. Hamaker;Eva Ceulemans;R.P.P.P. Grasman;Francis Tuerlinckx

  • Differentiate to Regulate: Low Negative Emotion Differentiation Is Associated With Ineffective Use but Not Selection of Emotion-Regulation Strategies.

    Elise K Kalokerinos;Yasemin Erbas;Eva Ceulemans;Peter Kuppens

  • Universal Intracultural and Intercultural Dimensions of the Recalled Frequency of Emotional Experience

    Peter Kuppens;Eva Ceulemans;Marieke E. Timmerman;Ed Diener

  • Three components of individualism

    Anu Realo;Anu Realo;Kati Koido;Eva Ceulemans;Jüri Allik

  • Time to get personal? The impact of researchers choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology

    Jojanneke A. Bastiaansen;Yoram K. Kunkels;Frank J. Blaauw;Steven M. Boker

  • Selection of the Number of Participants in Intensive Longitudinal Studies: A User-Friendly Shiny App and Tutorial for Performing Power Analysis in Multilevel Regression Models That Account for Temporal Dependencies:

    Ginette Lafit;Janne K. Adolf;Egon Dejonckheere;Inez Myin-Germeys

  • Why I don't always know what I'm feeling: The role of stress in within-person fluctuations in emotion differentiation.

    Yasemin Erbas;Eva Ceulemans;Elise K Kalokerinos;Marlies Houben

  • Using Raw VAR Regression Coefficients to Build Networks can be Misleading.

    Kirsten Bulteel;Francis Tuerlinckx;Annette Brose;Eva Ceulemans

  • Emotion differentiation in autism spectrum disorder

    Yasemin Erbas;Eva Ceulemans;Johanna Boonen;Ilse Noens

  • Acculturation of Personality: A Three-Culture Study of Japanese, Japanese Americans, and European Americans

    Derya Güngör;Marc H. Bornstein;Jozefien De Leersnyder;Linda Cote;Linda Cote

  • Functioning and participation problems of students with ADHD in higher education: which reasonable accommodations are effective?

    Dorien Jansen;Katja Petry;Eva Ceulemans;Saskia van der Oord

  • Profiles of children’s arithmetic fact development: A model-based clustering approach

    Kiran Vanbinst;Eva Ceulemans;Pol Ghesquière;Bert De Smedt

  • Emotion differentiation dissected: between-category, within-category, and integral emotion differentiation, and their relation to well-being

    Yasemin Erbas;Eva Ceulemans;Elisabeth S. Blanke;Laura Sels

  • VAR(1) based models do not always outpredict AR(1) models in typical psychological applications.

    Kirsten Bulteel;Merijn Mestdagh;Francis Tuerlinckx;Eva Ceulemans

  • Beyond Essentialism: Cultural Differences in Emotions Revisited

    Michael Boiger;Eva Ceulemans;Jozefien De Leersnyder;Yukiko Uchida

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Kuppens
Peter Kuppens KU Leuven
Henk A. L. Kiers
Henk A. L. Kiers University of Groningen
Ilse Noens
Ilse Noens KU Leuven
Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
Marinus H. van IJzendoorn University College London
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Eva Ceulemans

Recently Published Articles