World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
10794
World Ranking
6348
National Ranking
3445

Brian Reichow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Reichow sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian Reichow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Reichow sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Reichow is affiliated with the University of Connecticut Health Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and neuroscience, with a notable emphasis on developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, education, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their research topics cover areas such as autism spectrum disorder research, behavioral and psychological studies, family and disability support research, early childhood education and development, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, child development and digital technology, and infant development and preterm care.

Reichow has contributed to several recent papers including:

  • "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Classroom-Wide Social-Emotional Interventions for Preschool Children" (2020, Topics in Early Childhood Special Education)
  • "Commentary on the What Works Clearinghouse Standards and Procedures Handbook (v. 4.1) for the Review of Single-Case Research" (2021, Remedial and Special Education)
  • "Systematic Review of English Early Literacy Interventions for Children Who Are Dual Language Learners" (2020, Topics in Early Childhood Special Education)
  • "A Conceptual Replication of Targeted Professional Development to Increase Teachers' Behavior-Specific Praise" (2021, School Psychology Review)
  • "Overview of Meta-Analyses on Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder" (2024, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Patricia Snyder
  • Daniel M. Maggin
  • Jennifer Harrington
  • Erin E. Barton
  • Nicolette M. Grasley-Boy

Reichow's work has been published repeatedly in the following journals and venues:

  • Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
  • Journal of Early Intervention
  • Remedial and Special Education
  • School Psychology Review
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Best Publications

  • Social Skills Interventions for Individuals with Autism: Evaluation for Evidence-Based Practices within a Best Evidence Synthesis Framework

    Brian Reichow;Fred R. Volkmar

  • Overview of Meta-Analyses on Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention for Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Brian Reichow

  • Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

    Brian Reichow;Erin E Barton;Brian A Boyd;Kara Hume

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of Proposed DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder

    James C. McPartland;Brian Reichow;Fred R. Volkmar

  • Comprehensive synthesis of early intensive behavioral interventions for young children with autism based on the UCLA young autism project model.

    Brian Reichow;Mark Wolery

  • Development of the evaluative method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism.

    Brian Reichow;Fred R. Volkmar;Domenic V. Cicchetti

  • Systematic Review of Articles Describing Experience and Supports of Individuals with Autism Enrolled in College and University Programs

    Nicholas W. Gelbar;Isaac Smith;Brian Reichow

  • مداخله اولیه شدید رفتاری (EIBI) برای کودکان جوان مبتلا به اختلالات طیف اوتیسم (ASD)

    Brian Reichow;Kara Hume;Erin E Barton;Brian A Boyd

  • Comparison of Overlap Methods for Quantitatively Synthesizing Single-Subject Data

    Mark Wolery;Matthew Busick;Brian Reichow;Erin E. Barton

  • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Children With High-Functioning Autism: A Meta-analysis

    Denis G. Sukhodolsky;Michael H. Bloch;Kaitlyn E. Panza;Brian Reichow

  • Autism in DSM-5: progress and challenges.

    Fred R Volkmar;Brian Reichow

  • Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

    Brian Reichow;Amanda M Steiner;Fred Volkmar

  • A comprehensive survey of current and former college students with autism spectrum disorders.

    Nicholas W Gelbar;Allison Shefyck;Brian Reichow

  • A systematic review of sensory-based treatments for children with disabilities

    Erin E. Barton;Brian Reichow;Brian Reichow;Alana Schnitz;Isaac C. Smith;Isaac C. Smith

  • Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery

    Unknown

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacological treatment of the symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with pervasive developmental disorders.

    Brian Reichow;Fred R. Volkmar;Michael H. Bloch

  • Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism

    Brian Reichow

  • The Effects of DSM-5 Criteria on Number of Individuals Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review

    Isaac C. Smith;Brian Reichow;Fred R. Volkmar

  • Development, Procedures, and Application of the Evaluative Method for Determining Evidence-Based Practices in Autism

    Brian Reichow

  • Non-specialist psychosocial interventions for children and adolescents with intellectual disability or lower-functioning autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review.

    Brian Reichow;Chiara Servili;M. Taghi Yasamy;Corrado Barbui

  • Cochrane Review: Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

    Brian Reichow;Amanda M Steiner;Fred Volkmar

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred R. Volkmar
Fred R. Volkmar Yale University
Mark Wolery
Mark Wolery Vanderbilt University
Brian A. Boyd
Brian A. Boyd University of Kansas
Patricia Snyder
Patricia Snyder University of Florida
Maureen A. Conroy
Maureen A. Conroy University of Florida
James C. McPartland
James C. McPartland Yale University
Daniel M. Maggin
Daniel M. Maggin University of Illinois at Chicago
Nicholas A. Gage
Nicholas A. Gage University of Florida
Corrado Barbui
Corrado Barbui University of Verona
Denis G. Sukhodolsky
Denis G. Sukhodolsky Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, including social work, counseling, and human services. Many students choose online degrees to balance their studies with personal or professional commitments. While online programs are flexible, it’s important to understand the requirements for your chosen career path.

Social work is a popular option linked to psychology. Every state has specific educational and licensing requirements, so researching state guidelines is essential. For example, if you want to learn how to become a social worker in Ohio, you’ll need to meet both degree and supervised experience requirements.

Similarly, Oklahoma social work education requirements emphasize accredited degrees and specific exams. Requirements may differ if you’re planning to practice in Oregon. To learn more about this, see how to become a social worker in Oregon.

Even within the same field, state rules can vary widely. For example, the requirements to be a social worker in Pennsylvania include background checks and fieldwork. Always check the latest state-specific guidance when planning your online degree and future career.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Reichow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles