World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 71 1800 1743 65 59 452 16895

Fang-Xiang Wu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fang-Xiang Wu between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fang-Xiang Wu published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 20 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2021. 34 of the 541 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 57 publications 2020: 53 publications 2021: 58 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 33 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

541 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fang-Xiang Wu: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 4
2004 9
2005 4
2006 5
2007 9
2008 11
2009 14
2010 14
2011 22
2012 19
2013 23
2014 29
2015 24
2016 29
2017 22
2018 25
2019 57
2020 53
2021 58
2022 27
2023 22
2024 23
2025 33
2026 1
Total 541
Download as CSV

Fang-Xiang Wu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fang-Xiang Wu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 452–461 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 452 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73 452
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Fang-Xiang Wu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fang-Xiang Wu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192 71
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fang-Xiang Wu is affiliated with the University of Saskatchewan in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with 275 publications contributing to this field. Within this broad domain, Wu's work spans several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's research topics encompass:

  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Gene expression and cancer classification
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Circular RNAs in diseases

Wu has published extensively in several notable venues. The most frequent publication sources include:

  • Briefings in Bioinformatics
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • Neurocomputing
  • Bioinformatics

Recent publications by Fang-Xiang Wu include:

  • A survey on U-shaped networks in medical image segmentations (2020, Neurocomputing)
  • Biomedical data and computational models for drug repositioning: a comprehensive review (2020, Briefings in Bioinformatics)
  • Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder Based on Functional Brain Networks with Deep Learning (2020, Journal of Computational Biology)
  • Chinese clinical named entity recognition via multi-head self-attention based BiLSTM-CRF (2022, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine)
  • Attention convolutional neural network for accurate segmentation and quantification of lesions in ischemic stroke disease (2020, Medical Image Analysis)

Collaborations have played a significant role in Wu's research output. Frequent coauthors include Jianxin Wang, Min Li, Xiujuan Lei, Bo Liao, and Yulian Ding, with collaboration counts ranging from 17 to 37 joint works.

Best Publications

  • CytoNCA: a cytoscape plugin for centrality analysis and evaluation of protein interaction networks.

    Yu Tang;Min Li;Jianxin Wang;Yi Pan

  • A survey of MRI-based brain tumor segmentation methods

    Jin Liu;Min Li;Jianxin Wang;Fangxiang Wu

  • A review on machine learning principles for multi-view biological data integration.

    Yifeng Li;Fang-Xiang Wu;Alioune Ngom

  • Drug repositioning based on comprehensive similarity measures and Bi-Random walk algorithm

    Huimin Luo;Jianxin Wang;Min Li;Junwei Luo

  • A survey on U-shaped networks in medical image segmentations

    Liangliang Liu;Liangliang Liu;Jianhong Cheng;Quan Quan;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • Protein–protein interaction site prediction through combining local and global features with deep neural networks

    Min Zeng;Fuhao Zhang;Fang-Xiang Wu;Yaohang Li

  • Prediction of lncRNA-disease associations based on inductive matrix completion.

    Chengqian Lu;Mengyun Yang;Feng Luo;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • CircR2Disease: a manually curated database for experimentally supported circular RNAs associated with various diseases.

    Chunyan Fan;Xiujuan Lei;Zengqiang Fang;Qinghua Jiang

  • Recurrent Neural Network for Non-Smooth Convex Optimization Problems With Application to the Identification of Genetic Regulatory Networks

    Long Cheng;Zeng-Guang Hou;Yingzi Lin;Min Tan

  • Classification of Alzheimer's Disease Using Whole Brain Hierarchical Network

    Jin Liu;Min Li;Wei Lan;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • LDAP: a web server for lncRNA-disease association prediction

    Wei Lan;Min Li;Kaijie Zhao;Jin Liu

  • Identifying protein complexes and functional modules—from static PPI networks to dynamic PPI networks

    Bolin Chen;Weiwei Fan;Juan Liu;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • Biomedical data and computational models for drug repositioning: a comprehensive review.

    Huimin Luo;Min Li;Mengyun Yang;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • Iteration method for predicting essential proteins based on orthology and protein-protein interaction networks.

    Wei Hao Peng;Wei Hao Peng;Jianxin Wang;Weiping Wang;Qing Liu

  • ClusterViz: a cytoscape APP for cluster analysis of biological network

    Jianxin Wang;Jiancheng Zhong;Gang Chen;Min Li

  • Complex Brain Network Analysis and Its Applications to Brain Disorders: A Survey

    Jin Liu;Min Li;Yi Pan;Wei Lan

  • Protein–protein interactions: detection, reliability assessment and applications

    Xiaoqing Peng;Jianxin Wang;Wei Peng;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • Chinese clinical named entity recognition via multi-head self-attention based BiLSTM-CRF

    Unknown

  • Automated ICD-9 Coding via A Deep Learning Approach

    Min Li;Zhihui Fei;Min Zeng;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • SinNLRR: a robust subspace clustering method for cell type detection by non-negative and low-rank representation

    Ruiqing Zheng;Min Li;Zhenlan Liang;Fang-Xiang Wu;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • Prediction of CircRNA-Disease Associations Using KATZ Model Based on Heterogeneous Networks.

    Chunyan Fan;Xiujuan Lei;Fang-Xiang Wu

  • Modeling gene expression from microarray expression data with state-space equations.

    Fang-Xiang Wu;Wen-Jun Zhang;Anthony J. Kusalik

  • Predicting MicroRNA-Disease Associations Based on Improved MicroRNA and Disease Similarities

    Wei Lan;Jianxin Wang;Min Li;Jin Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Jianxin Wang
Jianxin Wang Central South University
Min Li
Min Li Central South University
Wenjun Zhang
Wenjun Zhang City University of Hong Kong
Yaohang Li
Yaohang Li Old Dominion University
Guy G. Poirier
Guy G. Poirier Université Laval
Luonan Chen
Luonan Chen Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xiaohua Hu
Xiaohua Hu Drexel University
Aidong Zhang
Aidong Zhang University of Virginia
Min Tan
Min Tan Chinese Academy of Sciences
Long Cheng
Long Cheng Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying computer science but want more flexibility, there are a variety of online programs to consider. For those seeking a fast track, a 2-year computer science degree online can provide accelerated learning and speedy entry into the tech workforce.

Beyond computer science, related fields can open doors to diverse career options. For instance, earning an online environmental engineering degree prepares graduates for roles focused on sustainability and environmental solutions. Those interested in innovation and machinery might consider the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree to access cost-effective education while mastering essential engineering principles.

Additionally, strong mathematical and analytical thinkers may be drawn to online physics degrees—a solid foundation for careers in engineering, research, and tech. Online programs in these fields make advanced education more accessible than ever, allowing you to tailor your studies to fit your schedule and career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Fang-Xiang Wu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles