World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
70
Citations
18049
World Ranking
2275
National Ranking
1021

Chad L. Myers publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chad L. Myers sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 188 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Chad L. Myers D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chad L. Myers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chad L. Myers is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a notable emphasis on molecular biology as a subfield.

The scientist has contributed to a variety of topics within their field, including bioinformatics and genomic networks, CRISPR and genetic engineering, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, fungal and yeast genetics research, DNA repair mechanisms, acute myeloid leukemia research, and RNA research and splicing.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • The Parkinson's disease protein alpha-synuclein is a modulator of processing bodies and mRNA stability, 2022, Cell
  • Genetic interaction mapping and exon-resolution functional genomics with a hybrid Cas9-Cas12a platform, 2020, Nature Biotechnology
  • Exploring whole-genome duplicate gene retention with complex genetic interaction analysis, 2020, Science
  • Systematic mapping of genetic interactions for de novo fatty acid synthesis identifies C12orf49 as a regulator of lipid metabolism, 2020, Nature Metabolism
  • Context-dependent regulation of ferroptosis sensitivity, 2022, Cell chemical biology

Their frequent collaborators include Charles Boone, Maximilian Billmann, Brenda Andrews, Jason Moffat, and Henry N. Ward.

Chad L. Myers has published extensively in several venues, with multiple publications in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Blood, Molecular Systems Biology, Nature Communications, and Cell Reports.

Best Publications

  • The genetic landscape of a cell.

    Michael Costanzo;Anastasia Baryshnikova;Jeremy Bellay;Yungil Kim

  • A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function

    Michael Costanzo;Benjamin VanderSluis;Elizabeth N. Koch;Anastasia Baryshnikova

  • Evaluation and Design of Genome-Wide CRISPR/SpCas9 Knockout Screens.

    Traver Hart;Amy Hin Yan Tong;Katie Chan;Jolanda Van Leeuwen

  • Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants

    Zhijian Li;Franco J. Vizeacoumar;Sondra Bahr;Jingjing Li

  • Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale

    Anastasia Baryshnikova;Michael Costanzo;Yungil Kim;Huiming Ding

  • Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Teresa Reguly;Ashton Breitkreutz;Lorrie Boucher;Bobby Joe Breitkreutz

  • Exploring the functional landscape of gene expression

    Matthew A. Hibbs;David C. Hess;Chad L. Myers;Curtis Huttenhower

  • Systematic Exploration of Synergistic Drug Pairs

    Murat Çokol;Murat Çokol;Hon Nian Chua;Hon Nian Chua;Murat Taşan;Murat Taşan;Beste Mutlu

  • A critical assessment of Mus musculus gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence.

    Lourdes Pena-Castillo;Murat Tasan;Chad L Myers;Hyunju Lee

  • Discovery of biological networks from diverse functional genomic data.

    Chad L Myers;Drew Robson;Adam Wible;Matthew A Hibbs

  • Finding function: evaluation methods for functional genomic data

    Chad L Myers;Daniel R Barrett;Matthew A Hibbs;Curtis Huttenhower

  • Systematic analysis of complex genetic interactions

    Elena Kuzmin;Benjamin VanderSluis;Wen Wang;Guihong Tan

  • An integrated approach to characterize genetic interaction networks in yeast metabolism

    Balázs Szappanos;Károly Kovács;Béla Szamecz;Frantisek Honti;Frantisek Honti

  • Epigenetic and genetic influences on DNA methylation variation in maize populations.

    Steven R. Eichten;Roman Briskine;Jawon Song;Qing Li

  • Using networks to measure similarity between genes: Association index selection

    Juan I Fuxman Bass;Alos Diallo;Justin Nelson;Juan M Soto

  • Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

    Anastasia Baryshnikova;Michael Costanzo;Scott Dixon;Franco J. Vizeacoumar

  • Significant conservation of synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks between distantly related eukaryotes

    Scott J. Dixon;Yaroslav Fedyshyn;Judice L. Y. Koh;T. S. Keshava Prasad

  • Accurate detection of aneuploidies in array CGH and gene expression microarray data

    Chad L. Myers;Maitreya J. Dunham;S. Y. Kung;Olga G. Troyanskaya

  • Global analysis of gene function in yeast by quantitative phenotypic profiling

    James A Brown;Gavin Sherlock;Chad L Myers;Nicola M Burrows

  • Data from: Systematic analysis of complex genetic interactions

    Elena Kuzmin;Benjamin VanderSluis;Wen Wang;Guihong Tan

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Boone
Charles Boone University of Toronto
Michael Costanzo
Michael Costanzo University of Toronto
Brenda J. Andrews
Brenda J. Andrews University of Toronto
Olga G. Troyanskaya
Olga G. Troyanskaya Princeton University
Minoru Yoshida
Minoru Yoshida University of Tokyo
Anne-Claude Gingras
Anne-Claude Gingras Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Vipin Kumar
Vipin Kumar University of Minnesota
Curtis Huttenhower
Curtis Huttenhower Harvard University
Yoshikazu Ohya
Yoshikazu Ohya University of Tokyo
Grant W. Brown
Grant W. Brown University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a career related to genetics, there are several online degree options and accelerated programs to consider. Many students start in healthcare with programs such as medical assistant training, and there are medical.assistant program options that can be completed in just six weeks.

For registered nurses looking to advance their education, choosing an rn to bsn with no clinicals can be a convenient way to earn a degree fully online, without onsite clinical requirements.

Those pursuing higher leadership or research roles might consider a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP). There are both fastest dnp program online options for quick advancement and the easiest dnp program online options designed for flexibility and accessibility.

Exploring these online healthcare pathways can help you build a strong foundation for a genetics or biomedical career while maintaining work-life balance.

Best Scientists Citing Chad L. Myers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles