What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Education
- Pedagogy
- Mathematics education
Naomi Zigmond mainly focuses on Mathematics education, Inclusion, Special education, Learning disability and Primary education.
Her work on Team teaching as part of general Mathematics education study is frequently linked to Relative efficacy and Research methodology, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
Her research on Inclusion often connects related topics like Mainstreaming.
Her Learning disability research focuses on Teaching method and how it connects with Co-teaching and Curriculum.
Her study in Primary education is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Education, Reading, Teacher education and Education theory.
Her Pedagogy study deals with Comparative education intersecting with Education policy.
Her most cited work include:
- Are Regular Education Classes Equipped to Accommodate Students with Learning Disabilities (253 citations)
- The Meaning and Practice of Inclusion for Students with Learning Disabilities Themes and Implications from the Five Cases (206 citations)
- Reading Instruction and Its Effects (191 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Mathematics education, Learning disability, Special education, Pedagogy and Primary education are her primary areas of study.
Her study in Reading extends to Mathematics education with its themes.
Her Learning disability research integrates issues from Secondary education, Mainstreaming and Teaching method.
Naomi Zigmond interconnects Inclusion, Spelling, Curriculum and Set in the investigation of issues within Special education.
Her Pedagogy study combines topics in areas such as Comparative education, Education theory and Medical education.
Her Primary education study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Context and Teacher education.
She most often published in these fields:
- Mathematics education (55.34%)
- Learning disability (45.63%)
- Special education (41.75%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2008-2019)?
- Mathematics education (55.34%)
- Special education (41.75%)
- Reading (15.53%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary areas of study are Mathematics education, Special education, Reading, Alternative assessment and Pedagogy.
Naomi Zigmond focuses mostly in the field of Mathematics education, narrowing it down to matters related to Coaching and, in some cases, Instructional design.
Her Special education study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Inclusion and Teaching method.
Naomi Zigmond combines subjects such as Mainstreaming, Gerontology and Education policy with her study of Inclusion.
The concepts of her Reading study are interwoven with issues in Audiology, Curriculum and Primary education.
In general Pedagogy, her work in Educational technology is often linked to Work and Public relations linking many areas of study.
Between 2008 and 2019, her most popular works were:
- What, Where, and How? Special Education in the Climate of Full Inclusion (109 citations)
- Coaches and Coaching in Reading First Schools: A Reality Check (81 citations)
- Instructional Activities and Group Work in the us Inclusive High School Co-Taught Science Class (49 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Education
- Pedagogy
- Mathematics education
Naomi Zigmond focuses on Special education, Mathematics education, Reading, Pedagogy and Alternative assessment.
As part of her studies on Special education, Naomi Zigmond frequently links adjacent subjects like Inclusion.
Her Inclusion research integrates issues from Comparative education and Mainstreaming.
In the field of Mathematics education, her study on Teaching method overlaps with subjects such as Class.
Her Reading research includes elements of At-risk students, Teacher education and Primary education.
Her research integrates issues of Developmental psychology, Curriculum and Fluency in her study of Alternative assessment.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
