World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 5020 4654 2371 2158 128 7672

Naomi Zigmond publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Naomi Zigmond between 1978 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Naomi Zigmond published across 42 years, from 1978 to 2019, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1995. 1 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1995. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 9 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1978 2019

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Naomi Zigmond: publications per year, 1978 to 2019
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 0
1980 3
1981 3
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 4
1986 6
1987 1
1988 3
1989 1
1990 9
1991 8
1992 7
1993 6
1994 9
1995 11
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 4
2006 7
2007 1
2008 3
2009 7
2010 3
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 0
2019 1
Total 134
Download as CSV

Naomi Zigmond publications per year - data summary

  • Naomi Zigmond, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pittsburgh, has 134 publications recorded across 42 years, from 1978 to 2019.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2019.
  • The most productive year is 1995, with 11 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 1987, 1989, 1997 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 42 years in the span carry no publications at all (1979, 1998 and 2018).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.4 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2015-2019) hold 5 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1991: 45 publications (3.2 per year); 1992-2005: 50 publications (3.6 per year); 2006-2019: 39 publications (2.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Naomi Zigmond publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Zigmond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 128
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Naomi Zigmond publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Naomi Zigmond, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pittsburgh, records 128 publications - the 29th percentile of the discipline.
  • 29% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Naomi Zigmond, and about 71% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Naomi Zigmond ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Naomi Zigmond D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Zigmond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Naomi Zigmond D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Naomi Zigmond, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pittsburgh, records 41 D-Index - the 38th percentile of the discipline.
  • 38% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Naomi Zigmond, and about 62% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Naomi Zigmond ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Naomi Zigmond is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their academic involvement is linked to this institution, serving as the primary base for their research and professional activities.

Information regarding recent publications, collaborations, or specific research outlets associated with Naomi Zigmond is not available.

Similarly, details on the main fields, subfields of study, or particular topics of work undertaken have not been provided in the available data.

No records of book publications or awards won have been indicated in the current dataset.

Best Publications

  • The Meaning and Practice of Inclusion for Students with Learning Disabilities Themes and Implications from the Five Cases

    Janice M. Baker;Naomi Zigmond

  • Where Should Students with Disabilities Receive Special Education Services? Is One Place Better Than Another?

    Naomi Zigmond

  • Reading Instruction and Its Effects

    Gaea Leinhardt;Naomi Zigmond;William W. Cooley

  • Co-Teaching in Middle School Classrooms under Routine Conditions: Does the Instructional Experience Differ for Students with Disabilities in Co-Taught and Solo-Taught Classes.

    Kathleen Magiera;Naomi Zigmond

  • Are Regular Education Classes Equipped to Accommodate Students with Learning Disabilities

    Janice M. Baker;Naomi Zigmond

  • Special Education in Restructured Schools: Findings from Three Multi-Year Studies.

    Naomi Zigmond

  • Co-Teaching in Secondary Schools: Teacher Reports of Developments in Australian and American Classrooms

    Don Rice;Naomi Zigmond

  • Coteaching Revisited: Redrawing the Blueprint.

    Amanda Kloo;Naomi Zigmond

  • Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty

    Rollanda E. O'Connor;Kathryn M. Bell;Kristin R. Harty;Louise K. Larkin

  • What, Where, and How? Special Education in the Climate of Full Inclusion

    Naomi Zigmond;Amanda Kloo;Victoria Volonino

  • Follow-Up of Postsecondary Age Learning Disabled Graduates and Drop-Outs.

    Naomi Zigmond;Helen Thornton

  • Coaches and Coaching in Reading First Schools: A Reality Check

    Rita M. Bean;Jason A. Draper;Virginia Hall;Jill Vandermolen

  • Benefits of Co-Teaching in Secondary Mathematics Classes:

    Kathleen Magiera;Cynthia Smith;Naomi Zigmond;Kelli Gebauer

  • WHAT DO HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS WANT? A STUDY OF EXPECTATIONS AND STANDARDS

    Mary Margaret Kerr;Naomi Zigmond

  • Concluding Comments Current and Future Practices in Inclusive Schooling

    Naomi Zigmond;Janice M. Baker

  • Twenty-Four Months After High School Paths Taken by Youth Diagnosed With Severe Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

    Naomi Zigmond

  • Follow-up of Postsecondary-Age Rural Learning Disabled Graduates and Dropouts

    Laurie U. deBettencourt;Naomi Zigmond;Helen Thornton

  • Full inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Too much of a good thing?

    Naomi Zigmond;Janice M. Baker

  • Characteristics of Children Labeled and Served as Learning Disabled in School Systems Affiliated With Child Service Demonstration Centers

    Charles A. Norman;Naomi Zigmond

  • Mainstream Experiences for Learning Disabled students (Project MELD): preliminary report.

    Naomi Zigmond;Janice Baker

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
Gaea Leinhardt
Gaea Leinhardt University of Pittsburgh
Robert A. Gable
Robert A. Gable Old Dominion University
Edward S. Shapiro
Edward S. Shapiro Lehigh University
Phillip S. Strain
Phillip S. Strain University of Denver
Lynn S. Fuchs
Lynn S. Fuchs Vanderbilt University
Deborah C. Simmons
Deborah C. Simmons Texas A&M University
Douglas Carnine
Douglas Carnine University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online opens doors to a wide range of career options, such as psychology, counseling, education, and family therapy. Online degree programs offer flexibility and access to reputable institutions, allowing students to balance their studies with work and personal commitments.

Affordability is a common concern. For students interested in advanced psychology careers, the cheapest psyd programs help minimize student debt while providing rigorous training. Similarly, those considering a master's in psychology often ask, how much does a masters in psychology cost? Affordable options are available without sacrificing quality.

If you are passionate about counseling couples or families, there are marriage and family therapy online programs accredited across the U.S. These programs lead to fulfilling careers in mental health and family services. For those pursuing leadership roles in education, consider an accelerated edd program, allowing you to finish your doctoral degree faster.

By choosing the right online degree, you can jumpstart your career in the Social Sciences and Humanities, all while saving time and money.

Best Scientists Citing Naomi Zigmond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles