World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
53
Citations
15946
World Ranking
2255
National Ranking
1091

Janette K. Klingner publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janette K. Klingner sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 109 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Janette K. Klingner D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janette K. Klingner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Early Career Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Janette K. Klingner was affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States during their academic career. The scope of their work spanned various topics and fields within educational research and related domains.

Klingner received the Early Career Award from the American Educational Research Association in 2004, recognizing contributions made early in their professional trajectory.

Best Publications

  • Qualitative Studies in Special Education

    Ellen Brantlinger;Robert Jimenez;Janette Klingner;Marleen Pugach

  • Mapping the Process: An Exemplar of Process and Challenge in Grounded Theory Analysis:

    Beth Harry;Keith M. Sturges;Janette K. Klingner

  • Why Are So Many Minority Students in Special Education?: Understanding Race & Disability in Schools

    Beth Harry;Janette Klingner;Lisa D. Delpit

  • Collaborative Strategic Reading during Social Studies in Heterogeneous Fourth-Grade Classrooms

    Janette Kettmann Klingner;Sharon Vaughn;Jeanne Shay Schumm

  • Cultural considerations with response to intervention models

    Janette K. Klingner;Patricia A. Edwards

  • Reciprocal Teaching of Reading Comprehension Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities Who Use English as a Second Language

    Janette Kettmann Klingner;Sharon Vaughn

  • English Language Learners Who Struggle With Reading Language Acquisition or LD

    Janette K. Klingner;Alfredo J. Artiles;Laura Mendez Barletta

  • Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students in Special Education through Culturally Responsive Educational Systems

    Janette K. Klingner;Alfredo J. Artiles;Elizabeth Kozleski;Beth Harry

  • Special Education Teachers' Views of Research-Based Practices:

    Alison Gould Boardman;María Elena Argüelles;Sharon Vaughn;Marie Tejero Hughes

  • CEC’s Standards for Classifying the Evidence Base of Practices in Special Education

    Bryan Gary Cook;Virginia Buysse;Janette Klingner;Timothy J. Landrum

  • Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties

    Janette K. Klingner;Sharon Vaughn;Alison Boardman

  • One School’s Implementation of RTI With English Language Learners: “Referring Into RTI”

    Michael John Orosco;Janette Klingner

  • Efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading With Middle School Students

    Sharon Vaughn;Janette K. Klingner;Elizabeth Swanson;Alison G. Boardman

  • Collaborative Strategic Reading “Real-World” Lessons From Classroom Teachers

    Janette K. Klingner;Sharon Vaughn;Maria Elena Arguelles;Marie Tejero Hughes

  • Barriers and Facilitators in Scaling up Research-Based Practices

    Janette K. Klingner;Suzette Ahwee;Paola Pilonieta;Rita Menendez

  • Collaborative Strategic Reading as a Means to Enhance Peer-Mediated Instruction for Reading Comprehension and Content-Area Learning:

    Sharon Vaughn;Janette K. Klingner;Diane P. Bryant

  • African American Families Under Fire Ethnographic Views of Family Strengths

    Beth Harry;Janette K. Klingner;Juliet Hart

  • Sustainability of Research-Based Practices

    Sharon Vaughn;Janette Klingner;Marie Hughes

  • The Intersection of Race, Culture, Language, and Disability Implications for Urban Education

    Wanda J. Blanchett;Janette K. Klingner;Beth Harry

  • Discarding the Deficit Model.

    Beth Harry;Janette Klingner

  • Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students in Special Education

    Janette K. Klingner;Alfredo J. Artiles;Elizabeth B. Kozleski;Beth Harry

Frequent Co-Authors

Sharon Vaughn
Sharon Vaughn The University of Texas at Austin
Alfredo J. Artiles
Alfredo J. Artiles Stanford University
Beth Harry
Beth Harry University of Miami
Mary T. Brownell
Mary T. Brownell University of Florida
Elizabeth Swanson
Elizabeth Swanson The University of Texas at Austin
Greg Roberts
Greg Roberts The University of Texas at Austin
Bryan G. Cook
Bryan G. Cook University of Virginia
Russell Gersten
Russell Gersten University of Oregon
Elizabeth B. Kozleski
Elizabeth B. Kozleski Stanford University
David O. Scanlon
David O. Scanlon University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career options. Many students choose flexible, accredited online programs to balance life, work, and study, while preparing for impactful roles.

If you are interested in understanding human behavior, pursuing a psychology degree online offers a solid foundation for careers in counseling, research, or human resources. For those aiming to make a difference in communities, there are 1 year msw programs online no bsw required, making it possible to start a social work career without a prior bachelor’s in the field.

Clinical psychology careers are also accessible through flexible doctoral training. Consider psy d programs online for practitioner-focused doctorates in psychology. Alternatively, for those passionate about family therapy, the best online mft programs provide structured pathways to licensure and specialized marriage and family counseling careers.

These online learning options support a range of career pathways, making advanced education in social sciences and humanities more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Janette K. Klingner

Recently Published Articles