World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
6148
World Ranking
7636
National Ranking
4095

Douglas Carnine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas Carnine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Douglas Carnine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas Carnine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas Carnine is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their academic career and research activities are connected to this institution.

Although specific details about their recent publications, frequent co-authors, or the venues where they commonly publish are not provided, the available data situates their professional work within the academic environment of a major U.S. university.

No information is given regarding main or subfields of study, main research topics, book publications, or awards won by Douglas Carnine. This limits the ability to outline particular scientific interests or contributions in detail.

The profile reflects a scholar whose precise areas of academic research, collaborations, and publication record are not documented in the available dataset, making it difficult to provide a more detailed overview of their scientific outputs or focus areas.

Best Publications

  • Theory of Instruction: Principles and Applications

    Siegfried Engelmann;Douglas Carnine

  • Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation.

    Douglas W. Carnine

  • Utilization of Contextual Information in Determining the Meaning of Unfamiliar Words.

    Douglas Carnine;Edward J. Kameenui;Gayle Coyle

  • Bridging the Special Education Divide

    Jack E. Andrews;Douglas W. Carnine;Martha J. Coutinho;Eugene B. Edgar

  • The integration of research and practice in the prevention of youth problem behaviors.

    Anthony Biglan;Patricia J. Mrazek;Douglas Carnine;Brian R. Flay

  • Instructional Design in Mathematics for Students with Learning Disabilities

    Douglas Carnine

  • Direct Instruction in Reading Comprehension.

    Russell Gersten;Douglas Carnine

  • Designing Effective Mathematics Instruction: A Direct Instruction Approach

    Marcy Stein;Diane Kinder;Jerry Silbert;Douglas W. Carnine

  • Direct Instruction: Integrating Curriculum Design and Effective Teaching Practice

    Marcy Stein;Douglas Carnine;Robert Dixon

  • Instructional strategies for studying content area texts in the intermediate grades.

    Abby Adams;Douglas Carnine;Russell Gersten

  • Story Grammar: An Approach for Promoting At-Risk Secondary Students' Comprehension of Literature.

    Joseph Dimino;Russell Gersten;Douglas Carnine;Geneva Blake

  • Direct instruction: What it is and what it is becoming

    Diane Kinder;Douglas Carnine

  • Student Error Patterns as a Function of Curriculum Design Teaching Fractions to Remedial High School Students and High School Students with Learning Disabilities

    Bernadette Kelly;Russell Gersten;Douglas Carnine

  • Measuring Implementation of a Structured Educational Model in an Urban School District: An Observational Approach:

    Russell M Gersten;Douglas W Carnine;Paul B Williams

  • The Interaction of Reading Skills and Science Content Knowledge when Teaching Struggling Secondary Students.

    Linda Carnine;Douglas Carnine

  • Curricular Interventions for Teaching Higher Order Thinking to All Students: Introduction to the Special Series

    Douglas Carnine

  • Teaching Problem Solving Through Computer Simulations

    John Woodward;Douglas Carnine;Russell Gersten

  • Direct Instruction Research: The Third Decade

    Russell Gersten;Douglas Carnine;John Woodward

  • A Descriptive Analysis of Mathematics Curricular Materials from a Pedagogical Perspective A Case Study of Fractions

    Douglas Carnine;Asha K. Jitendra;Jerry Silbert

  • Effects of instructional Design Variables on Vocabulary Acquisition of LD Students A Study of Computer-Assisted Instruction

    Gary Johnson;Russell Gersten;Douglas Carnine

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell Gersten
Russell Gersten University of Oregon
Edward J. Kameenui
Edward J. Kameenui University of Oregon
Asha K. Jitendra
Asha K. Jitendra University of California, Riverside
Donald D. Deshler
Donald D. Deshler University of Kansas
Jean B. Schumaker
Jean B. Schumaker University of Kansas
Janet Marquis
Janet Marquis University of Kansas
Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Anthony Biglan
Anthony Biglan Oregon Research Institute
James M. Kauffman
James M. Kauffman University of Virginia
Lynn S. Fuchs
Lynn S. Fuchs Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of career options, including counseling, therapy, and mental health services. The flexibility of online psychology programs makes it easier for students across the USA to pursue their academic and career goals at their own pace.

If you are considering a specialized career, such as becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), it’s important to understand state and local requirements. In different cities, the journey may vary. You can learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Detroit or find details on mft requirements in Durham and mft requirements in El Paso. Each location has its own licensing procedures, education standards, and supervised clinical experience needs.

Graduates interested in practicing in Indiana can refer to this guide on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Fort Wayne. Carefully comparing these pathways and requirements can help you choose the right online psychology degree and career direction for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas Carnine

Recently Published Articles