World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

John McLennan publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John McLennan sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

John McLennan D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John McLennan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

John McLennan is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a focus on several subfields including Mechanical Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Geophysics, Mechanics of Materials, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

The main topics of their scholarly work cover a range of areas:

  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies

John McLennan has published extensively in several scientific venues, frequently contributing to these outlets:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Geothermics
  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • Renewable Energy

A selection of recent papers reveals areas of active research and collaboration. These include:

  • "Utah FORGE: Hydrogeothermal modeling of a granitic based discrete fracture network," 2020, Geothermics
  • "Geothermal battery energy storage," 2020, Renewable Energy
  • "Experimental investigation of proppant particles transport in a tortuous fracture," 2020, Powder Technology
  • "Evaluation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration potential in high volatile bituminous coal," 2021, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • "Improving heat extraction performance of an enhanced geothermal system utilizing cryogenic fracturing," 2020, Geothermics

Throughout their career, John McLennan has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including Palash Panja, Joseph N. Moore, Haiyan Zhu, Xuanhe Tang, and Milind Deo. These co-authors have co-published multiple papers with McLennan, indicating ongoing partnerships in their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing

    Andrew P. Bunger;John McLennan;Rob Jeffrey

  • A new approach to hydraulic fracturing modeling in naturally fractured reservoirs

    Branko Damjanac;Ivan Gil;Matt Pierce;Marisela Sanchez

  • Poroelasticity considerations in in situ stress determination by hydraulic fracturing

    E. Detournay;A.H.-D. Cheng;J.-C. Roegiers;J.D. McLennan

  • Microbial production of methane and carbon dioxide from lignite, bituminous coal, and coal waste materials

    A. Opara;D. J. Adams;Michael L Free;John David Mclennan

  • Study on wellbore fluid flow and heat transfer of a multilateral-well CO2 enhanced geothermal system

    Yu Shi;Xianzhi Song;Gaosheng Wang;John McLennan

  • A Poroelastic PKN Hydraulic Fracture Model Based on an Explicit Moving Mesh Algorithm

    E. Detournay;A. H.-D. Cheng;J. D. McLennan

  • The Role of Natural Fractures in Shale Gas Production

    Ian Walton;John McLennan

  • A 3D peridynamic simulation of hydraulic fracture process in a heterogeneous medium

    S. Nadimi;I. Miscovic;J. McLennan

  • Performance evaluation of enhanced geothermal system (EGS): Surrogate models, sensitivity study and ranking key parameters

    Pranay Asai;Palash Panja;John McLennan;Joseph Moore

  • Effect of different flow schemes on heat recovery from Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)

    Pranay Asai;Palash Panja;John McLennan;Milind Deo

  • Efficient workflow for simulation of multifractured enhanced geothermal systems (EGS)

    Pranay Asai;Palash Panja;John David Mclennan;Joseph N Moore

  • Utah FORGE: Hydrogeothermal modeling of a granitic based discrete fracture network

    S. Nadimi;B. Forbes;J. Moore;R. Podgorney

  • Performance and stimulation of horizontal wells

    M.J. Economides;J.D. McLennan;E. Brown;TX Midland

  • Geothermal battery energy storage

    Sidney Green;John McLennan;Palash Panja;Kevin Kitz

  • Effect of Layered Heterogeneity on Fracture Initiation in Tight Gas Shales

    Roberto Suarez-Rivera;Sidney J. Green;John McLennan;Mao Bai

  • ISRM Suggested Method for Uniaxial-Strain Compressibility Testing for Reservoir Geomechanics

    J. W. Dudley;M. Brignoli;B. R. Crawford;R. T. Ewy

  • On the Extraction of Rare Earth Elements from Geothermal Brines

    York R. Smith;Pankaj Kumar;John D. McLennan

  • Experimental investigation of proppant particles transport in a tortuous fracture

    Hai Qu;Shimao Tang;Zhonghua Liu;John Mclennan

  • Evaluation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration potential in high volatile bituminous coal

    Oluwafemi John Omotilewa;Palash Panja;Carlos Vega-Ortiz;John McLennan

  • DEM-CFD Modeling of Proppant Pillar Deformation and Stability during the Fracturing Fluid Flowback

    Haiyan Zhu;Haiyan Zhu;Jiadong Shen;Fengshou Zhang;Fengshou Zhang;Bo Huang

  • Reservoir quality, gas accumulation and completion quality assessment of Silurian Longmaxi marine shale gas play in the Sichuan Basin, China

    Shu Jiang;Shu Jiang;Xianglu Tang;Xianglu Tang;Shengxiang Long;John McLennan

  • Macroscale Mechanical and Microscale Structural Changes in Chinese Wufeng Shale With Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Fracturing

    Qing-You Liu;Lei Tao;Hai-Yan Zhu;Zheng-Dong Lei

Frequent Co-Authors

Shu Jiang
Shu Jiang China University of Geosciences
Brian McPherson
Brian McPherson University of Utah
Emmanuel M Detournay
Emmanuel M Detournay University of Minnesota
Fengshou Zhang
Fengshou Zhang Tongji University
Michael J. Economides
Michael J. Economides University of Houston
Subhash N. Shah
Subhash N. Shah University of Oklahoma
Jan D. Miller
Jan D. Miller University of Utah
Ya-Pu Zhao
Ya-Pu Zhao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Alexander H.-D. Cheng
Alexander H.-D. Cheng University of Mississippi
Maurice B. Dusseault
Maurice B. Dusseault University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary fields and career paths. Many students and professionals enhance their expertise by combining Earth Science with other disciplines through flexible online programs. For veterans interested in creative fields, exploring online photography degree programs for veterans can be a valuable option that blends technical and artistic skills.

Language proficiency is another asset in Earth Science careers, especially for those working in global environmental initiatives. Pursuing a bachelors in spanish online can open up diverse opportunities in communication, research, and policy roles.

Veterans aiming to expand their career options might also find the specialized support and structure of a spanish degree online for veterans valuable, as it provides tailored resources alongside rigorous academics.

Additionally, creative communication skills are vital in scientific fields. An online mfa creative writing program offers a unique route to enhance storytelling and data presentation skills, critical for careers in science communication, education, and outreach.

Best Scientists Citing John McLennan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles