World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 36 8687 8373 2411 2236 191 5518

Andrew P. Bunger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew P. Bunger between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew P. Bunger published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2015. 20 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2015. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 8 publications
2004 2025

220 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew P. Bunger: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 7
2006 4
2007 8
2008 6
2009 5
2010 10
2011 8
2012 4
2013 9
2014 13
2015 18
2016 14
2017 11
2018 14
2019 13
2020 7
2021 16
2022 16
2023 16
2024 12
2025 8
Total 220
Download as CSV

Andrew P. Bunger publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew P. Bunger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 191 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378 191
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew P. Bunger D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew P. Bunger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311 36
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew P. Bunger is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Engineering, encompassing 104 publications.

The subfields of Bunger's work include:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Geophysics
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Their research topics cover a range of specialized areas such as:

  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research

Bunger has contributed to several peer-reviewed articles, including these recent publications:

  • "Experimental quantification of the effect of oil based drilling fluid contamination on properties of wellbore cement," 2020, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • "Convergence of micro-geochemistry and micro-geomechanics towards understanding proppant shale rock interaction: A Caney shale case study in southern Oklahoma, USA," 2021, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • "Graphene nanoplatelets reinforced cement as a solution to leaky wellbores reinforcing weak points in hydrated Portland cement with graphene nanoparticles improves mechanical and chemical durability of wellbore cements," 2022, Cement and Concrete Composites
  • "Time-Dependent Hydraulic Fracture Initiation," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "Observations of breakage for transversely isotropic shale using acoustic emission and X-ray computed tomography: Effect of bedding orientation, pre-existing weaknesses, and pore water," 2021, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bunger include:

  • Guanyi Lu
  • Yunxing Lu
  • Mileva Radonjic
  • Dustin Crandall
  • Yao Huang

Key publication venues where Bunger has a notable presence are:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
  • Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth

Best Publications

  • Numerical methods for hydraulic fracture propagation: a review of recent trends

    Brice Lecampion;Andrew Bunger;Xi Zhang

  • A review of mechanical models of dike propagation: Schools of thought, results and future directions

    Eleonora Rivalta;Eleonora Rivalta;Benoit Taisne;Andrew P Bunger;Richard F Katz

  • Toughness-dominated Hydraulic Fracture with Leak-off

    Andrew P. Bunger;Emmanuel M Detournay;Dmitry I. Garagash

  • COHESIVE ZONE FINITE ELEMENT-BASED MODELING OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURES

    Zuorong Chen;A.P. Bunger;Xi Zhang;Robert G. Jeffrey

  • Parameters Affecting the Interaction Among Closely Spaced Hydraulic Fractures

    Andrew P. Bunger;Xi Zhang;Robert G. Jeffrey

  • Interference Fracturing: Nonuniform Distributions of Perforation Clusters That Promote Simultaneous Growth of Multiple Hydraulic Fractures

    Anthony Peirce;Andrew Bunger

  • Initiation and growth of a hydraulic fracture from a circular wellbore

    X. Zhang;R.G. Jeffrey;A.P. Bunger;M. Thiercelin

  • Measuring Hydraulic Fracture Growth in Naturally Fractured Rock

    Robert G. Jeffrey;Andrew Bunger;Brice LeCampion;Xi Zhang

  • Modeling the growth of laccoliths and large mafic sills: Role of magma body forces

    Andrew Bunger;Alexander Cruden;Alexander Cruden

  • Experimental validation of the tip asymptotics for a fluid-driven crack

    Andrew P. Bunger;Emmanuel M Detournay

  • Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing

    Andrew P. Bunger;John McLennan;Rob Jeffrey

  • Experiments versus theory for the initiation and propagation of radial hydraulic fractures in low permeability materials

    Brice Lecampion;Jean Desroches;Robert G. Jeffrey;Andrew P. Bunger

  • A Detailed Comparison of Experimental and Numerical Data on Hydraulic Fracture Height Growth Through Stress Contrasts

    Robert G. Jeffrey;Andrew Bunger

  • Constraints on Simultaneous Growth of Hydraulic Fractures from Multiple Perforation Clusters in Horizontal Wells

    Andrew Bunger;Robert G. Jeffrey;Xi Zhang

  • Comparison between laboratory experiments and coupled simulations of saucer-shaped hydraulic fractures in homogeneous brittle-elastic solids

    Andrew P. Bunger;Elizaveta Gordeliy;Elizaveta Gordeliy;Emmanuel Detournay;Emmanuel Detournay

  • Interface debonding driven by fluid injection in a cased and cemented wellbore: Modeling and experiments

    Brice Lecampion;Andrew Bunger;Andrew Bunger;James Kear;Daniel Quesada

  • Experimental Investigation of the Interaction Among Closely Spaced Hydraulic Fractures

    A.P. Bunger;R.G. Jeffrey;J. Kear;X. Zhang

  • Early-Time Solution for a Radial Hydraulic Fracture

    Andrew P. Bunger;Andrew P. Bunger;Emmanuel M Detournay;Emmanuel M Detournay

  • Impact of Partially Cemented and Non-persistent Natural Fractures on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation

    Wei Fu;Brandon C. Ames;Andrew P. Bunger;Alexei A. Savitski

  • Analysis of the power input needed to propagate multiple hydraulic fractures

    A.P. Bunger

  • Parameters Effecting the Interaction among Closely Spaced Hydraulic Fractures

    Andrew Bunger;Xi Zhang;Robert G. Jeffrey

  • A simplified model for heat extraction by circulating fluid through a closed-loop multiple-fracture enhanced geothermal system

    Bisheng Wu;Xi Zhang;Robert G. Jeffrey;Andrew P. Bunger

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert G. Jeffrey
Robert G. Jeffrey University of Wollongong
Emmanuel M Detournay
Emmanuel M Detournay University of Minnesota
Alexander R. Cruden
Alexander R. Cruden Monash University
Anthony Peirce
Anthony Peirce University of British Columbia
Arcady Dyskin
Arcady Dyskin University of Western Australia
Eleonora Rivalta
Eleonora Rivalta Universität Hamburg
Kevin P. Chen
Kevin P. Chen University of Pittsburgh
Klaus Regenauer-Lieb
Klaus Regenauer-Lieb University of New South Wales
Mian Chen
Mian Chen China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Ming-Jun Li
Ming-Jun Li Corning (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Engineering and Technology programs in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. The rise in accredited online programs provides flexibility and affordability, letting you upskill or specialize while balancing other commitments.

Many engineering and tech professionals move into leadership roles with an online mba aacsb, gaining advanced management and business skills that employers value. Those interested in law and regulatory compliance may pursue a paralegal certificate online aba-approved to expand job opportunities within technology-focused legal sectors.

Human resources expertise is in demand across tech-driven industries. A masters of human resources can help you secure strategic HR roles, while strong communication remains vital for project managers and leaders. Advancing your skills with an online masters in communication can prepare you for influential roles bridging technical and non-technical teams.

Each of these online degrees supports a wider range of career options and can complement your studies in Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew P. Bunger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles