World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
43
Citations
6313
World Ranking
6272
National Ranking
1730

Ahmad Ghassemi publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmad Ghassemi sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 243 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ahmad Ghassemi D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmad Ghassemi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ahmad Ghassemi is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States. Their research spans various areas within engineering, with a focus on mechanical engineering, ocean engineering, mechanics of materials, geophysics, and environmental engineering. These fields contribute to a broad understanding of subsurface and structural processes relevant to energy and environmental applications.

Their recent publications address several aspects of hydraulic fracturing, geothermal systems, fracture mechanics, and geophysical interpretations. Notable papers include: Close Observation of Hydraulic Fracturing at EGS Collab Experiment 1: Fracture Trajectory, Microseismic Interpretations, and the Role of Natural Fractures (2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth); Heterogeneous Fracture Slip and Aseismic-Seismic Transition in a Triaxial Injection Test (2020, Geophysical Research Letters); Heat production from lab-scale enhanced geothermal systems in granite and gabbro (2020, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences); Finite element simulations of 3D planar hydraulic fracture propagation using a coupled hydro-mechanical interface element (2020, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics); and Laboratory-Scale Investigation of the Slippage of a Natural Fracture Resulting from an Approaching Hydraulic Fracture (2021, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering).

The scientist's main topics of work encompass:

  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Numerical methods in engineering

Frequent collaborators include Qian Gao, Dharmendra Kumar, Baohua Liu, Zhi Ye, and Pengcheng Fu. These partnerships are reflected in multiple coauthored papers, indicating ongoing research efforts in related topics.

The main publication venues for Ahmad Ghassemi's work are:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • SPE Production & Operations
  • Proceedings of the 9th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth

The comprehensive output in engineering, especially with 115 publications, highlights a focus on multidisciplinary approaches. Mechanical engineering, ocean engineering, and mechanics of materials form significant subfields while geophysics and environmental engineering contribute further specialization.

Best Publications

  • A Review of Some Rock Mechanics Issues in Geothermal Reservoir Development

    A. Ghassemi

  • A three-dimensional thermo-poroelastic model for fracture response to injection/extraction in enhanced geothermal systems

    A. Ghassemi;X. Zhou

  • Injection-Induced Shear Slip and Permeability Enhancement in Granite Fractures

    Zhi Ye;Ahmad Ghassemi

  • Integral equation solution of heat extraction from a fracture in hot dry rock

    A. H.D. Cheng;A. Ghassemi;Emmanuel M Detournay

  • A 3-D study of the effects of thermomechanical loads on fracture slip in enhanced geothermal reservoirs

    A. Ghassemi;S. Tarasovs;A.H.-D. Cheng

  • Effects of heat extraction on fracture aperture: A poro–thermoelastic analysis

    Ahmad Ghassemi;Andrew Nygren;Alexander Cheng

  • Linear chemo-poroelasticity for swelling shales: theory and application

    A. Ghassemi;A. Diek

  • Changes in fracture aperture and fluid pressure due to thermal stress and silica dissolution/precipitation induced by heat extraction from subsurface rocks

    Ahmad Ghassemi;G. Suresh Kumar

  • A transient fictitious stress boundary element method for porothermoelastic media

    A. Ghassemi;Q. Zhang

  • A numerical study of sequential and simultaneous hydraulic fracturing in single and multi-lateral horizontal wells

    Varahanaresh Sesetty;Ahmad Ghassemi

  • Finite element analysis of coupled chemo-poro-thermo-mechanical effects around a wellbore in swelling shale

    Xiaoxian Zhou;Ahmad Ghassemi

  • Influence of coupled chemo-poro-thermoelastic processes on pore pressure and stress distributions around a wellbore in swelling shale

    A. Ghassemi;Q. Tao;A. Diek

  • Porothermoelasticity for swelling shales

    A. Ghassemi;A. Diek

  • A three-dimensional analysis of simultaneous and sequential fracturing of horizontal wells

    Dharmendra Kumar;Ahmad Ghassemi

  • A reactive thermo-poroelastic analysis of water injection into an enhanced geothermal reservoir

    Chakra Rawal;Ahmad Ghassemi

  • Three-Dimensional Poroelastic Modeling of Multiple Hydraulic Fracture Propagation from Horizontal Wells

    Dharmendra Kumar;Ahmad Ghassemi

  • Infill-Well Fracturing Optimization in Tightly Spaced Horizontal Wells

    Reza Safari;Richard Lewis;Xiaodan Ma;Uno Mutlu

  • An integral equation solution for three-dimensional heat extraction from planar fracture in hot dry rock

    A. Ghassemi;S. Tarasovs;A. H.-D. Cheng

  • Integral equation solution of heat extraction‐induced thermal stress in enhanced geothermal reservoirs

    A. Ghassemi;S. Tarasovs;A. H.-D. Cheng

  • Design, modeling, and evaluation of a doublet heat extraction model in enhanced geothermal systems

    Yidong Xia;Mitchell Plummer;Earl Mattson;Robert Podgorney

  • Porothermoelastic Analysis of the Response of a Stationary Crack Using the Displacement Discontinuity Method

    A. Ghassemi;Q. Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Lianjie Huang
Lianjie Huang Los Alamos National Laboratory
Alexander H.-D. Cheng
Alexander H.-D. Cheng University of Mississippi
Timothy J. Kneafsey
Timothy J. Kneafsey Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Patrick F. Dobson
Patrick F. Dobson Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jonny Rutqvist
Jonny Rutqvist Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Mark D. Zoback
Mark D. Zoback Stanford University
Roland N. Horne
Roland N. Horne Stanford University
Derek Elsworth
Derek Elsworth Pennsylvania State University
Brett M. Carpenter
Brett M. Carpenter University of Oklahoma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and career paths. Many students consider expanding their expertise through complementary online degrees, which offer flexibility and can be tailored to unique professional goals.

For veterans looking to leverage their experience, several programs offer support and specialized resources, such as online Spanish degrees for veterans. Language skills combined with Earth Science knowledge can enhance opportunities in environmental consulting and international projects.

Creative professionals may find value in pursuing online MFA programs, which complement scientific fields with strong communication and visualization skills.

For those interested in leadership roles within environmental organizations or companies, an best online master degree in human resource management could be a strategic choice, focusing on managing teams and resources effectively.

Additionally, many programs are designed with diverse learners in mind, including older students exploring career changes through degrees for seniors. These tailored programs make continuing education accessible and rewarding at any stage of life.

Best Scientists Citing Ahmad Ghassemi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles