World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
11745
World Ranking
6087
National Ranking
3309

Steven W. Duck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven W. Duck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 251 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steven W. Duck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven W. Duck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven W. Duck is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their academic contributions encompass various aspects of research and scholarship within their professional domain.

Their recent scholarly output does not list any papers, which may indicate a focus on other academic activities or unpublished work at this time.

Their network of collaboration does not include any frequent co-authors based on the available data. This suggests either individual contributions or a varied set of collaborative relationships that do not recur regularly.

There is no specific information about frequent publication venues associated with their work. Consequently, no patterns can be identified regarding the journals or conferences where their research is typically disseminated.

Details regarding book publications are not recorded, indicating that their contributions may primarily reside in journal articles, presentations, or other formats rather than extended monographs or edited volumes.

The available data does not enumerate main fields, subfields, or particular topics of study attributed to Steven W. Duck, which limits the characterization of their areas of expertise in terms of thematic focus or specialization.

No awards or formal recognitions have been documented for Steven W. Duck in the source data, and there is no indication that they are deceased.

Best Publications

  • Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions.

    Steve Duck

  • Meaningful Relationships: Talking, Sense, and Relating

    Steven W. Duck

  • Human Relationships

    Steve Duck

  • A biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication

    Thomas Hadjistavropoulos;Kenneth D. Craig;Steve Duck;Annmarie Cano

  • Some Evident Truths About Conversations in Everyday Relationships All Communications Are Not Created Equal

    Steve Duck;Deborah J. Rutt;Margaret Hoy;Hurst Heather Strejc

  • Personal Relationships and Personal Constructs: A Study of Friendship Formation

    Steve Duck

  • Friends, for Life: The Psychology of Close Relationships

    Steven W. Duck

  • Friends, for life: The psychology of personal relationships

    Steve Duck

  • Studying Interpersonal Interaction

    Steven W. Duck

  • Relationships as Unfinished Business: Out of the Frying Pan and into the 1990s

    Steven W. Duck

  • On the Origin of the Specious: Are Personal Relationships Really Interpersonal States?

    Steve Duck;Harriet Sants

  • Intimate Relationships: Development, Dynamics and Deterioration

    Daniel Perlman;Steve Duck

  • Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system.

    Steve Duck

  • Personal Relationships in Disorder

    Steve Duck;Robin Gilmour

  • Relating to others

    Steven W. Duck

  • Understanding personal relationships : an interdisciplinary approach

    Steve Duck;Daniel Perlman

  • Personal relationships and social support

    Steve Duck;Roxane Cohen Silver

  • The Emerging field of personal relationships

    Robin Gilmour;Steve Duck

  • Dynamics of television

    Jon Baggaley;Steve Duck

  • STRATAGEMS, SPOILS, AND A SERPENT'S TOOTH: ON THE DELIGHTS AND DILEMMAS OF PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS

    Steve Duck

  • Theory and Practice in Interpersonal Attraction

    Steven W. Duck

  • Under-studied relationships : off the beaten track

    Julia T. Wood;Steven W. Duck

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Perlman
Daniel Perlman University of North Carolina at Greensboro
William Ickes
William Ickes The University of Texas at Arlington
Walid A. Afifi
Walid A. Afifi University of California, Santa Barbara
Kenneth D. Craig
Kenneth D. Craig University of British Columbia
Annmarie Cano
Annmarie Cano Wayne State University
Roxane Cohen Silver
Roxane Cohen Silver University of California, Irvine
Philip L. Jackson
Philip L. Jackson Université Laval
Liesbet Goubert
Liesbet Goubert Ghent University
James C. Coyne
James C. Coyne University of Groningen
Tine Vervoort
Tine Vervoort Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring psychology students often consider related fields and alternative online degree pathways to broaden their career prospects. Social work is a particularly relevant option, bridging the gap between direct client support and psychological expertise. Many universities now offer flexible and affordable online social work degrees, making education accessible for students across the U.S.

Location can play a big role when selecting a program. Students searching for the best value online social work degrees in Indiana or the best value online social work degrees in Kansas will find programs that combine affordability, accredited curriculum, and strong job placement rates. Those in the Mid-Atlantic region can consider the most valuable online social work degree programs in Maryland.

If you’re open to studying in other areas, exploring the best value online social work programs in the Midwest can also uncover additional flexible options. Many graduates of these programs pursue roles in mental health, counseling, school support, and nonprofit leadership. Choosing a related online degree can open doors to diverse, meaningful career pathways closely aligned with psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Steven W. Duck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles