World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
11878
World Ranking
2744
National Ranking
1578

Brant R. Burleson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brant R. Burleson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brant R. Burleson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brant R. Burleson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brant R. Burleson was affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research centered on the field of Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience as a subfield. The main topics covered in their work included Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, as well as Neural dynamics and brain function.

Over the course of their career, Burleson contributed to scientific knowledge through publications in notable venues. Their recent work includes a paper titled Anticipatory and reactive mechanisms of habituation to visual distractors, published in 2025 in the journal Scientific Reports.

The scientist frequently collaborated with other researchers. Some of their regular co-authors were:

  • Massimo Turatto
  • Gijs Plomp
  • David Pascucci

Burleson's publications appeared predominantly in the journal Scientific Reports, reflecting a focus on disseminating findings related to neuroscience topics.

Their research explored mechanisms underlying neural processing and behavior, often utilizing EEG and brain-computer interface methodologies to examine brain function dynamics. This work contributed to a better understanding of how anticipatory and reactive processes operate in response to visual distractions.

Best Publications

  • Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills

    Jennifer C. Greene;Brant R. Burleson

  • The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication

    Brant R. Burleson

  • Children's expectations of the outcomes of social strategies: relations with sociometric status and maternal disciplinary styles

    Craig H. Hart;Gary W. Ladd;Brant R. Burleson

  • How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals

    Brant R. Burleson;Daena J. Goldsmith

  • Effects of Sex, Culture, and Support Type on Perceptions of Spousal Social Support: An Assessment of the “Support Gap” Hypothesis in Early Marriage

    Yan Xu;Brant R. Burleson

  • Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community.

    Brant Raney Burleson;Terrance L. Albrecht;Irwin G. Sarason

  • The Development of Comforting Communication Skills in Childhood and Adolescence.

    Brant R. Burleson

  • Comforting messages: Features, functions, and outcomes.

    Brant R. Burleson

  • Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach

    Brant R. Burleson

  • Assessing Explanations for Sex Differences in Emotional Support A Test of the Different Cultures and Skill Specialization Accounts

    Adrianne W. Kunkel;Brant R. Burleson

  • The development of persuasive communication strategies in kindergarteners through twelfth‐graders

    Jesse G. Delia;Susan L. Kline;Brant R. Burleson

  • Explaining Variations in the Effects of Supportive Messages A Dual-Process Framework

    Graham D. Bodie;Brant R. Burleson

  • The Myth of Gender Cultures: Similarities Outweigh Differences in Men's and Women's Provision of and Responses to Supportive Communication

    Erina Lynne Macgeorge;Angela R. Graves;Bo Feng;Seth J. Gillihan

  • Men's and Women's Evaluations of Communication Skills in Personal Relationships: When Sex Differences Make a Difference and when they don't

    Brant R. Burleson;Adrianne W. Kunkel;Wendy Samter

  • THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMMUNICATION SKILL AND MARITAL SATISFACTION: SOME MODERATING EFFECTS

    Brant R. Burleson;Wayne H. Denton

  • Consistencies in theoretical and naive evaluations of comforting messages

    Brant R. Burleson;Wendy Samter

  • Effects of Cognitive Complexity on the Perceived Importance of Communication Skills in Friends

    Brant R. Burleson;Wendy Samter

  • The Impact of Situational Variables on Helpers' Perceptions of Comforting Messages An Attributional Analysis

    Susanne M. Jones;Brant R. Burleson

  • A new look at similarity and attraction in marriage: Similarities in social‐cognitive and communication skills as predictors of attraction and satisfaction

    Brant R. Burleson;Wayne H. Denton

  • Explaining Cultural Differences in Evaluations of Emotional Support Behaviors: Exploring the Mediating Influences of Value Systems and Interaction Goals

    Brant R. Burleson;Steven R. Mortenson

  • Communication Yearbook 18

    Brant R. Burleson

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas H. Sprenkle
Douglas H. Sprenkle Purdue University West Lafayette
Irwin G. Sarason
Irwin G. Sarason University of Washington
Susan M. Johnson
Susan M. Johnson University of Ottawa
Craig H. Hart
Craig H. Hart Brigham Young University
Susan Sprecher
Susan Sprecher Illinois State University
Gary W. Ladd
Gary W. Ladd Arizona State University
Elaine Hatfield
Elaine Hatfield University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jennifer C. Greene
Jennifer C. Greene University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens diverse professional pathways, many of which can be accessed or advanced through online degrees. When considering your future, it’s important to understand the differences between roles, such as the psychiatrist salary vs psychologist comparison. Psychiatrists, as medical doctors, typically command higher salaries, while psychologists often focus more on therapy and assessment.

Beyond clinical settings, the business world offers numerous opportunities in industrial organizational psychology jobs. These roles focus on optimizing workplace productivity, employee satisfaction, and organizational structure. Graduates can explore a variety of career paths in industrial organizational psychology, including human resources specialist, training coordinator, or talent development manager.

For those holding an advanced degree, there are many jobs with a master's degree in behavioral psychology available. These may include roles in mental health counseling, behavior analysis, social services, and research. Online graduate programs can provide the flexibility needed to balance life and study while preparing for these rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Brant R. Burleson

Recently Published Articles