World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
6861
World Ranking
12451
National Ranking
5049

Alan Mishchenko publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Mishchenko sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 223 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alan Mishchenko D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Mishchenko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan Mishchenko is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research contributions span several fields within computer science and engineering, concentrating primarily on areas related to logic synthesis, verification, and integrated circuit design.

The main fields of study for Mishchenko include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

The subfields of their research cover a variety of specialized topics, such as:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Mishchenko's work addresses several core topics, including:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
  • VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Low-power High-performance VLSI Design
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems

The scientist has published extensively, with frequent contributions to notable venues such as:

  • IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2022 27th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)
  • 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)
  • IEEE Transactions on Computers

Selected recent papers by Alan Mishchenko reflect their focus on logic synthesis and circuit design methodologies. These include:

  • "DAG-Aware Synthesis Orchestration," 2024, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • "Boolean Rewriting Strikes Back: Reconvergence-Driven Windowing Meets Resynthesis," 2022, 2022 27th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)
  • "A Simulation-Guided Paradigm for Logic Synthesis and Verification," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • "A Circuit-Based SAT Solver for Logic Synthesis," 2021, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)
  • "Three-Input Gates for Logic Synthesis," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems

The scientist frequently collaborates with peers including:

  • Giovanni De Micheli
  • Heinz Riener
  • Robert K. Brayton
  • Eleonora Testa
  • Luca Amarù

Best Publications

  • ABC: an academic industrial-strength verification tool

    Robert Brayton;Alan Mishchenko

  • DAG-aware AIG rewriting a fresh look at combinational logic synthesis

    Alan Mishchenko;Satrajit Chatterjee;Robert Brayton

  • Efficient implementation of property directed reachability

    Niklas Een;Alan Mishchenko;Robert Brayton

  • Reducing Structural Bias in Technology Mapping

    S. Chatterjee;A. Mishchenko;R.K. Brayton;Xinning Wang

  • Improvements to Technology Mapping for LUT-Based FPGAs

    A. Mishchenko;S. Chatterjee;R.K. Brayton

  • A General Decomposition for Reversible Logic

    Marek Perkowski;Lech Jozwiak;Pawel Kerntopf;Alan Mishchenko

  • Fast Heuristic Minimization of Exclusive-Sums-of-Products

    Alan Mishchenko;Marek Perkowski

  • Logic synthesis of reversible wave cascades

    Alan Mishchenko;Marek A. Perkowski

  • Scalable don't-care-based logic optimization and resynthesis

    Alan Mishchenko;Robert Brayton;Jie-Hong R. Jiang;Stephen Jang

  • Improvements to combinational equivalence checking

    Alan Mishchenko;Satrajit Chatterjee;Robert Brayton;Niklas Een

  • Combinational and sequential mapping with priority cuts

    Alan Mishchenko;Sungmin Cho;Satrajit Chatterjee;Robert Brayton

  • FRAIGs: A Unifying Representation for Logic Synthesis and Verification

    Alan Mishchenko;Satrajit Chatterjee;Roland Jiang;Robert Brayton

  • An algorithm for bi-decomposition of logic functions

    Alan Mishchenko;Bernd Steinbach;Marek Perkowski

  • SAT-Based Complete Don't-Care Computation for Network Optimization

    Alan Mishchenko;Robert K. Brayton

  • Applying logic synthesis for speeding up SAT

    Niklas Een;Alan Mishchenko;Niklas Sörensson

  • Scalable Logic Synthesis using a Simple Circuit Structure

    Alan Mishchenko;Robert Brayton

  • Improvements to Combinational Equivalence Checking

    Unknown

  • Regularity and Symmetry as a Base for Efficient Realization of Reversible Logic Circuits

    Marek Perkowski;Pawel Kerntopf;Andrzej Buller;Malgorzata Chrzanowska-Jeske

  • Using simulation and satisfiability to compute flexibilities in Boolean networks

    A. Mishchenko;J.S. Zhang;S. Sinha;J.R. Burch

  • A new-enhanced constructive decomposition and mapping algorithm

    Alan Mishchenko;Xinning Wang;Timothy Kam

  • Scalable exploration of functional dependency by interpolation and incremental SAT solving

    Chih-Chun Lee;Jie-Hong R. Jiang;Chung-Yang (Ric) Huang;Alan Mishchenko

  • Automated Synthesis of Generalized Reversible Cascades using Genetic Algorithms

    Martin Lukac;Mikhail Pivtoraiko;Alan Mishchenko;Marek Perkowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert K. Brayton
Robert K. Brayton University of California, Berkeley
Alexandre Petrenko
Alexandre Petrenko Computer Research Institute of Montréal
Marek Perkowski
Marek Perkowski Portland State University
Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli University of California, Berkeley
Xiaoyu Song
Xiaoyu Song Portland State University
Tsutomu Sasao
Tsutomu Sasao Meiji University
Paolo Ienne
Paolo Ienne École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Pierre-Emmanuel Gaillardon
Pierre-Emmanuel Gaillardon University of Utah
Jaijeet Roychowdhury
Jaijeet Roychowdhury University of California, Berkeley
David Z. Pan
David Z. Pan The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science can open up diverse and rewarding career pathways. Many students choose interdisciplinary options, such as an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online, which combines technical skills with real-world impact on sustainability.

Cost is a significant factor when choosing a degree. Prospective engineers, for example, often consider the mechanical engineering cost of education before enrolling in an online program. Flexible and affordable options make it easier to enter high-demand STEM fields.

For those with an interest in the laws of nature and advanced analytics, pursuing an online physics bachelor's degree can provide a solid foundation in scientific problem-solving and data analysis. This can be a strong complement to computer science skills.

With the growing importance of data-driven decision making in industries, data science degrees are increasingly popular among computer science students. These programs often emphasize practical skills in statistics, programming, and machine learning for robust career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Alan Mishchenko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles