World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
47
Citations
32803
World Ranking
4074
National Ranking
1756

Hannah Carter publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannah Carter sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 134 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Hannah Carter D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannah Carter sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hannah Carter is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans several fields within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a focus on molecular biology, immunology, oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and cancer research.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics related to cancer biology and immune responses. Their main topics include immunotherapy and immune responses, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, cancer genomics and diagnostics, vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches, prostate cancer treatment and research, RNA modifications and cancer, and single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Genomic and evolutionary classification of lung cancer in never smokers, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Strength of immune selection in tumors varies with sex and age, 2020, Nature Communications
  • IRE1α regulates macrophage polarization, PD-L1 expression, and tumor survival, 2020, PLoS Biology
  • MHC-I genotype and tumor mutational burden predict response to immunotherapy, 2020, Genome Medicine
  • Activation of NF-κB and p300/CBP potentiates cancer chemoimmunotherapy through induction of MHC-I antigen presentation, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Meghana S. Pagadala
  • Maurizio Zanetti
  • Andrea Castro
  • Brent S. Rose
  • Richard L. Hauger

Their work is frequently published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Nature Communications
  • The Journal of Immunology

Best Publications

  • Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma

    D. Bell;A. Berchuck;M. Birrer;J. Chien

  • An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme

    D. Williams Parsons;Siân Jones;Xiaosong Zhang;Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin

  • Core Signaling Pathways in Human Pancreatic Cancers Revealed by Global Genomic Analyses

    Siân Jones;Xiaosong Zhang;D. Williams Parsons;D. Williams Parsons;Jimmy Cheng Ho Lin

  • MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources

    Ursula Pieper;Narayanan Eswar;Ben M. Webb;David Eramian;David Eramian

  • Accumulation of driver and passenger mutations during tumor progression

    Ivana Bozic;Tibor Antal;Tibor Antal;Hisashi Ohtsuki;Hannah Carter

  • Network based stratification of tumor mutations

    Trey Ideker;Matan Hofree;John Paul Shen

  • The Genetic Landscape of the Childhood Cancer Medulloblastoma

    D. Williams Parsons;D. Williams Parsons;Meng Li;Xiaosong Zhang;Siân Jones

  • Circulating tumour DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Rui Hua Xu;Wei Wei;Wei Wei;Michal Krawczyk;Wenqiu Wang

  • Whole-exome sequencing of neoplastic cysts of the pancreas reveals recurrent mutations in components of ubiquitin-dependent pathways

    Jian Wu;Yuchen Jiao;Marco Dal Molin;Anirban Maitra

  • Cancer-Specific High-Throughput Annotation of Somatic Mutations: Computational Prediction of Driver Missense Mutations

    Hannah Carter;Sining Chen;Leyla Isik;Svitlana Tyekucheva

  • Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the Variant Effect Scoring Tool

    Hannah Carter;Christopher Douville;Peter D. Stenson;David Neil Cooper

  • Hybrid Periportal Hepatocytes Regenerate the Injured Liver without Giving Rise to Cancer.

    Joan Font-Burgada;Shabnam Shalapour;Suvasini Ramaswamy;Brian Hsueh

  • MHC-1 Genotypes Restricts The Oncogenic Mutational Landscape

    Joan Font-Burgada;David Rossell;Hannah K. Carter;Rachel Marty

  • Whole-exome sequencing combined with functional genomics reveals novel candidate driver cancer genes in endometrial cancer

    Han Liang;Lydia W.T. Cheung;Jie Li;Zhenlin Ju

  • Epigenetic aging signatures in mice livers are slowed by dwarfism, calorie restriction and rapamycin treatment

    Tina Wang;Brian Tsui;Jason F. Kreisberg;Neil A. Robertson

  • Exploring the landscape of focal amplifications in cancer using AmpliconArchitect

    Viraj Deshpande;Jens Luebeck;Nam-Phuong D. Nguyen;Mehrdad Bakhtiari

  • Whole-genome sequencing identifies a recurrent functional synonymous mutation in melanoma

    Jared J. Gartner;Stephen C. J. Parker;Todd D. Prickett;Kenneth Adam Dutton-Regester

  • Evolutionary pressure against MHC class II binding cancer mutations

    Rachel Marty Pyke;Wesley Kurt Thompson;Rany M. Salem;Joan Font-Burgada;Joan Font-Burgada

  • Computational approaches to identify functional genetic variants in cancer genomes.

    Abel Gonzalez-Perez;Ville Mustonen;Boris Reva;Graham R. S. Ritchie

  • Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma

    D. Bell;A. Berchuck;M. Birrer;J. Chien

Frequent Co-Authors

Rachel Karchin
Rachel Karchin Johns Hopkins University
Trey Ideker
Trey Ideker University of California, San Diego
Nicholas J. Schork
Nicholas J. Schork Translational Genomics Research Institute
Olivier Harismendy
Olivier Harismendy University of California, San Diego
Kenneth W. Kinzler
Kenneth W. Kinzler Johns Hopkins University
Bert Vogelstein
Bert Vogelstein Johns Hopkins University
Kang Zhang
Kang Zhang Macau University of Science and Technology
Jill P. Mesirov
Jill P. Mesirov University of California, San Diego
Victor E. Velculescu
Victor E. Velculescu Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Wesley K. Thompson
Wesley K. Thompson University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens the door to several related online degrees and career pathways. Many students interested in genetics also consider adjacent fields, such as health informatics or medical administration. For those seeking quick entry into the workforce, financial aid for medical billing and coding programs can provide affordable and accessible options.

If you’re eager to complete your education at a faster pace, consider enrolling in a fast track degree. These programs are designed to help you earn your qualifications more quickly without compromising on quality. Flexibility is another key consideration, and many students appreciate the autonomy offered by online self paced colleges, which allow for learning according to your own schedule.

Cost is a major concern when choosing a program. Some universities with no application fee make starting your journey even more affordable. Carefully comparing these options ensures you select a path that fits both your budget and your career goals in genetics or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Hannah Carter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles