World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
72
Citations
28077
World Ranking
19762
National Ranking
1774

Roger Jones publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger Jones sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 448 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Roger Jones D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger Jones sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roger Jones is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Health Professions, with a concentration on General Health Professions. They have also contributed work in related subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Clinical Psychology, Family Practice, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics covered in their research include Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Healthcare Policy and Management, Healthcare cost, quality, and practices, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills, Innovations in Medical Education, and Patient Safety and Medication Errors.

Roger Jones has published research in several venues, most frequently in the British Journal of General Practice. Other publication venues include BMJ and the Victoria University Research Repository at Victoria University.

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BMJ
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University)

Their recent published papers include:

  • General practice in the years ahead: relationships will matter more than ever (2020), British Journal of General Practice
  • Language Matters (2020), British Journal of General Practice
  • Books: A Fortunate Woman: A Country Doctor's Story (2022), British Journal of General Practice
  • Diagnostic reasoning: maximise trainees' clinical experience (2022), BMJ
  • Books: Spring Cannot be Cancelled: David Hockney in Normandy (2021), British Journal of General Practice

Frequent co-authors of Roger Jones include Celeste Young and Craig Cormick.

Best Publications

  • The Montreal Definition and Classification of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Global Evidence-Based Consensus

    Nimish Vakil;Sander V van Zanten;Peter Kahrilas;John Dent

  • Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection--the Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report.

    P. Malfertheiner;F. Mégraud;C. O'Morain;A. P. S. Hungin

  • Assessment of clinical competence

    Val Wass;Cees Van der Vleuten;John Shatzer;Roger Jones

  • Guidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and practical management

    Robin Spiller;Robin Spiller;Q Aziz;F Creed;A Emmanuel

  • Irritable bowel syndrome in the general population.

    R. Jones;S. Lydeard

  • Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care.

    Roger Jones;O. Junghard;N. Vakil

  • Prevalence of symptoms of dyspepsia in the community.

    R. Jones;S. Lydeard

  • Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Michael J. Shaw;Nicholas J. Talley;Timothy J. Beebe;Todd Rockwood;Todd Rockwood

  • Dyspepsia in England and Scotland.

    R. H. Jones;S. E. Lydeard;F. D. R. Hobbs;J. E. Kenkre

  • Domestic Violence Against Women: Systematic Review of Prevalence Studies

    Samia Alhabib;Ula Nur;Roger Jones

  • Accuracy of the diagnosis of GORD by questionnaire, physicians and a trial of proton pump inhibitor treatment: the Diamond Study

    John Dent;Nimish Vakil;Roger Jones;Peter Bytzer

  • Changing face of medical curricula

    Roger Jones;Roger Higgs;Cathy de Angelis;David Prideaux

  • Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference

    Peter Cantillon;Roger Jones

  • Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care

    Nicky Britten;Roger Jones;Elizabeth Murphy;Rosie Stacy

  • An irritable bowel syndrome-specific symptom questionnaire: development and validation.

    I K Wiklund;S Fullerton;C J Hawkey;R H Jones

  • Systematic review: persistent reflux symptoms on proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care and community studies

    H. El-Serag;A. Becher;R. Jones

  • Clinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain: a cluster randomized trial.

    Michael Hurley;N.E. Walsh;H.L. Mitchell;T.J. Pimm

  • Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database

    Roger Jones;Radoslav Latinovic;Judith Charlton;Martin C Gulliford

  • Why do qualitative research

    Roger Jones

  • Factors affecting the decision to consult with dyspepsia: comparison of consulters and non-consulters.

    S Lydeard;R Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher J. Hawkey
Christopher J. Hawkey University of Nottingham
Nicholas J. Talley
Nicholas J. Talley University of Newcastle Australia
Nimish Vakil
Nimish Vakil University of Wisconsin–Madison
Philip N. Baker
Philip N. Baker University of Leicester
Paul T. Seed
Paul T. Seed King's College London
Myfanwy Morgan
Myfanwy Morgan King's College London
Peter Malfertheiner
Peter Malfertheiner Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Mark Ashworth
Mark Ashworth King's College London
Peter J. Kahrilas
Peter J. Kahrilas Northwestern University
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for healthcare professionals grows, online degree programs offer expanded opportunities for those interested in medicine or related fields. Many students consider becoming a nurse practitioner through psych nurse practitioner programs—a pathway that provides advanced clinical skills and flexible options for working nurses.

For those looking to step into healthcare management or policy, choosing the cheapest online health science degree can be a cost-effective entry point. This area opens doors to administrative and leadership roles within hospitals or clinics without committing to medical school.

Aspiring leaders seeking advanced credentials should consider the most affordable online mha programs for a streamlined route to high-level management positions. Meanwhile, practicing nurses aiming for clinical excellence may benefit from the cheapest dnp programs online, combining flexibility with in-depth expertise.

Exploring these related online degrees allows prospective students to find career pathways that align with their goals, schedules, and budgets, while meeting the growing needs of the healthcare sector in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Roger Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles