World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel Kolarich

Daniel Kolarich

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 63 10416 9616 285 275 182 11562

Daniel Kolarich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel Kolarich between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel Kolarich published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2023. 5 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2023. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel Kolarich: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 5
2004 6
2005 5
2006 13
2007 3
2008 4
2009 5
2010 9
2011 10
2012 13
2013 13
2014 7
2015 6
2016 17
2017 8
2018 12
2019 9
2020 8
2021 16
2022 4
2023 20
2024 4
2025 4
2026 1
Total 207
Download as CSV

Daniel Kolarich publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Kolarich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 182 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915 182
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel Kolarich D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Kolarich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130 63
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel Kolarich is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia and specializes primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology as the dominant subfield. Their research spans several interconnected areas including Spectroscopy, Immunology, Genetics, and Cell Biology.

The scientist's work emphasizes topics such as Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research, which represents the largest share of their contributions. Other notable topics include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, Ubiquitin and Proteasome Pathways, Genetics, Bioinformatics and Biomedical Research, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Proteoglycans and Glycosaminoglycans Research, and Galectins and Cancer Biology.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel Kolarich include:

  • Nicolle H. Packer
  • Frédérique Lisacek
  • Andrew J. Link
  • Christoph H. Borchers
  • Yu-Ju Chen

The scientist's research has appeared in several publication venues numerous times. Among the most frequent are PROTEOMICS, with 19 publications, followed by multiple papers in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Methods, Molecular Omics, and Blood.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel Kolarich include:

  • Community evaluation of glycoproteomics informatics solutions reveals high-performance search strategies for serum glycopeptide analysis, 2021, Nature Methods
  • Glycomics & Glycoproteomics: From Analytics to Function, 2020, Molecular Omics
  • Improving Chicken Responses to Glycoconjugate Vaccination Against Campylobacter jejuni, 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • The cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicle glycocode in immunoevasion, 2022, Trends in Immunology
  • Glycoproteome remodeling in MLL-rearranged B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 2021, Theranostics

Best Publications

  • Structural analysis of N - and O -glycans released from glycoproteins

    Pia Hønnerup Jensen;Niclas G Karlsson;Daniel Kolarich;Daniel Kolarich;Nicolle H Packer

  • Simultaneous Glycan-Peptide Characterization Using Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography and Parallel Fragmentation by CID, Higher Energy Collisional Dissociation, and Electron Transfer Dissociation MS Applied to the N-Linked Glycoproteome of Campylobacter jejuni

    Nichollas E Scott;Benjamin L Parker;Angela M Connolly;Jana Paulech

  • Analysis of immunoglobulin glycosylation by LC-ESI-MS of glycopeptides and oligosaccharides.

    Johannes Stadlmann;Martin Pabst;Daniel Kolarich;Daniel Kolarich;Renate Kunert

  • Analysis of Asn-linked glycans from vegetable foodstuffs: widespread occurrence of Lewis a, core α1,3‐linked fucose and xylose substitutions

    Iain B.H. Wilson;Reinhard Zeleny;Daniel Kolarich;Erika Staudacher

  • Mucin-type O-glycosylation--putting the pieces together.

    Pia H. Jensen;Daniel Kolarich;Nicolle H. Packer

  • Integrative epigenome-wide analysis demonstrates that DNA methylation may mediate genetic risk in inflammatory bowel disease

    N. T. Ventham;N. A. Kennedy;A. T. Adams;R. Kalla

  • N-Glycan analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of electrophoretically separated nonmammalian proteins: application to peanut allergen Ara h 1 and olive pollen allergen Ole e 1.

    Daniel Kolarich;Friedrich Altmann

  • Determination of site-specific glycan heterogeneity on glycoproteins

    Daniel Kolarich;Pia Hønnerup Jensen;Pia Hønnerup Jensen;Friedrich Altmann;Nicolle H Packer

  • Antibody binding to venom carbohydrates is a frequent cause for double positivity to honeybee and yellow jacket venom in patients with stinging-insect allergy ☆ ☆☆

    Wolfgang Hemmer;Margarete Focke;Daniel Kolarich;Iain B.H. Wilson

  • Biological activity of IgE specific for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants.

    Kay Foetisch;Sandra Westphal;Iris Lauer;Mechthild Retzek

  • Comprehensive glyco-proteomic analysis of human α1-antitrypsin and its charge isoforms

    Daniel Kolarich;Alfred Weber;Peter L. Turecek;Hans Peter Schwarz

  • Trichomonas vaginalis: metronidazole and other nitroimidazole drugs are reduced by the flavin enzyme thioredoxin reductase and disrupt the cellular redox system. Implications for nitroimidazole toxicity and resistance

    David Leitsch;Daniel Kolarich;Marina Binder;Johannes Stadlmann

  • Plant-based heterologous expression of Mal d 2, a thaumatin-like protein and allergen of apple (Malus domestica), and its characterization as an antifungal protein.

    Monika Krebitz;Birgit Wagner;Fatima Ferreira;Clemens Peterbauer

  • Nitroimidazole action in Entamoeba histolytica: a central role for thioredoxin reductase.

    David Leitsch;Daniel Kolarich;Iain B. H Wilson;Friedrich Altmann

  • Comparison of Methods for Profiling O-Glycosylation HUMAN PROTEOME ORGANISATION HUMAN DISEASE GLYCOMICS/PROTEOME INITIATIVE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY OF IgA1

    Yoshinao Wada;Anne Dell;Stuart M. Haslam;Bérangère Tissot

  • Quantitative mapping of glycoprotein micro-heterogeneity and macro-heterogeneity: an evaluation of mass spectrometry signal strengths using synthetic peptides and glycopeptides.

    Kathrin Stavenhagen;Hannes Hinneburg;Morten Thaysen-Andersen;Laura Hartmann

  • Comparison of fluorescent labels for oligosaccharides and introduction of a new postlabeling purification method.

    Martin Pabst;Daniel Kolarich;Gerald Pöltl;Thomas Dalik

  • Hazelnut (Corylus avellana) vicilin Cor a 11: molecular characterization of a glycoprotein and its allergenic activity

    Iris Lauer;Kay Foetisch;Daniel Kolarich;Barbara K. Ballmer-Weber

  • The role of glycosylation in IBD

    Evropi Theodoratou;Harry Campbell;Nicholas T. Ventham;Daniel Kolarich

  • Localisation and distribution of the major allergens in apple fruits

    Gorji Marzban;Helene Puehringer;Rickmer Dey;Sabine Brynda

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicolle H. Packer
Nicolle H. Packer Macquarie University
Friedrich Altmann
Friedrich Altmann BOKU University
Peter H. Seeberger
Peter H. Seeberger Max Planck Society
Manfred Wuhrer
Manfred Wuhrer Leiden University Medical Center
Niclas G. Karlsson
Niclas G. Karlsson University of Gothenburg
Joseph Zaia
Joseph Zaia Boston University
Frédérique Lisacek
Frédérique Lisacek University of Geneva
Kiyoko F. Aoki-Kinoshita
Kiyoko F. Aoki-Kinoshita Soka University of America
Hans Peter Schwarz
Hans Peter Schwarz Baxter (United States)
Celso A. Reis
Celso A. Reis University of Porto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a diverse range of online degrees and healthcare career paths. For example, an online nutrition degree is a great choice for those interested in the science of food, dietetics, and wellness. Such programs can lead to certified nutritionist or dietitian roles in various settings.

Many biology graduates also pursue nursing. If you are already a registered nurse, enrolling in one of the rn to bsn programs can help advance your credentials and career opportunities. For those looking to move into healthcare leadership, consider one of the fastest online master's in healthcare administration programs for a quick and flexible route.

Demand for mental health professionals is also growing. Aspiring specialists can check out psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online. These programs are ideal for those passionate about mental wellness and patient care. Each of these options helps biology-focused students build rewarding and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Kolarich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles