World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel Kolarich

Daniel Kolarich

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
11562
World Ranking
10419
National Ranking
285

Daniel Kolarich publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Kolarich sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 182 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Daniel Kolarich D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Kolarich sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Kolarich is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia and specializes primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology as the dominant subfield. Their research spans several interconnected areas including Spectroscopy, Immunology, Genetics, and Cell Biology.

The scientist's work emphasizes topics such as Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research, which represents the largest share of their contributions. Other notable topics include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, Ubiquitin and Proteasome Pathways, Genetics, Bioinformatics and Biomedical Research, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Proteoglycans and Glycosaminoglycans Research, and Galectins and Cancer Biology.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel Kolarich include:

  • Nicolle H. Packer
  • Frédérique Lisacek
  • Andrew J. Link
  • Christoph H. Borchers
  • Yu-Ju Chen

The scientist's research has appeared in several publication venues numerous times. Among the most frequent are PROTEOMICS, with 19 publications, followed by multiple papers in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Methods, Molecular Omics, and Blood.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel Kolarich include:

  • Community evaluation of glycoproteomics informatics solutions reveals high-performance search strategies for serum glycopeptide analysis, 2021, Nature Methods
  • Glycomics & Glycoproteomics: From Analytics to Function, 2020, Molecular Omics
  • Improving Chicken Responses to Glycoconjugate Vaccination Against Campylobacter jejuni, 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • The cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicle glycocode in immunoevasion, 2022, Trends in Immunology
  • Glycoproteome remodeling in MLL-rearranged B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 2021, Theranostics

Best Publications

  • Structural analysis of N - and O -glycans released from glycoproteins

    Pia Hønnerup Jensen;Niclas G Karlsson;Daniel Kolarich;Daniel Kolarich;Nicolle H Packer

  • Simultaneous Glycan-Peptide Characterization Using Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography and Parallel Fragmentation by CID, Higher Energy Collisional Dissociation, and Electron Transfer Dissociation MS Applied to the N-Linked Glycoproteome of Campylobacter jejuni

    Nichollas E Scott;Benjamin L Parker;Angela M Connolly;Jana Paulech

  • Analysis of immunoglobulin glycosylation by LC-ESI-MS of glycopeptides and oligosaccharides.

    Johannes Stadlmann;Martin Pabst;Daniel Kolarich;Daniel Kolarich;Renate Kunert

  • Analysis of Asn-linked glycans from vegetable foodstuffs: widespread occurrence of Lewis a, core α1,3‐linked fucose and xylose substitutions

    Iain B.H. Wilson;Reinhard Zeleny;Daniel Kolarich;Erika Staudacher

  • Mucin-type O-glycosylation--putting the pieces together.

    Pia H. Jensen;Daniel Kolarich;Nicolle H. Packer

  • Integrative epigenome-wide analysis demonstrates that DNA methylation may mediate genetic risk in inflammatory bowel disease

    N. T. Ventham;N. A. Kennedy;A. T. Adams;R. Kalla

  • N-Glycan analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of electrophoretically separated nonmammalian proteins: application to peanut allergen Ara h 1 and olive pollen allergen Ole e 1.

    Daniel Kolarich;Friedrich Altmann

  • Determination of site-specific glycan heterogeneity on glycoproteins

    Daniel Kolarich;Pia Hønnerup Jensen;Pia Hønnerup Jensen;Friedrich Altmann;Nicolle H Packer

  • Antibody binding to venom carbohydrates is a frequent cause for double positivity to honeybee and yellow jacket venom in patients with stinging-insect allergy ☆ ☆☆

    Wolfgang Hemmer;Margarete Focke;Daniel Kolarich;Iain B.H. Wilson

  • Biological activity of IgE specific for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants.

    Kay Foetisch;Sandra Westphal;Iris Lauer;Mechthild Retzek

  • Comprehensive glyco-proteomic analysis of human α1-antitrypsin and its charge isoforms

    Daniel Kolarich;Alfred Weber;Peter L. Turecek;Hans Peter Schwarz

  • Trichomonas vaginalis: metronidazole and other nitroimidazole drugs are reduced by the flavin enzyme thioredoxin reductase and disrupt the cellular redox system. Implications for nitroimidazole toxicity and resistance

    David Leitsch;Daniel Kolarich;Marina Binder;Johannes Stadlmann

  • Plant-based heterologous expression of Mal d 2, a thaumatin-like protein and allergen of apple (Malus domestica), and its characterization as an antifungal protein.

    Monika Krebitz;Birgit Wagner;Fatima Ferreira;Clemens Peterbauer

  • Nitroimidazole action in Entamoeba histolytica: a central role for thioredoxin reductase.

    David Leitsch;Daniel Kolarich;Iain B. H Wilson;Friedrich Altmann

  • Comparison of Methods for Profiling O-Glycosylation HUMAN PROTEOME ORGANISATION HUMAN DISEASE GLYCOMICS/PROTEOME INITIATIVE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY OF IgA1

    Yoshinao Wada;Anne Dell;Stuart M. Haslam;Bérangère Tissot

  • Quantitative mapping of glycoprotein micro-heterogeneity and macro-heterogeneity: an evaluation of mass spectrometry signal strengths using synthetic peptides and glycopeptides.

    Kathrin Stavenhagen;Hannes Hinneburg;Morten Thaysen-Andersen;Laura Hartmann

  • Comparison of fluorescent labels for oligosaccharides and introduction of a new postlabeling purification method.

    Martin Pabst;Daniel Kolarich;Gerald Pöltl;Thomas Dalik

  • Hazelnut (Corylus avellana) vicilin Cor a 11: molecular characterization of a glycoprotein and its allergenic activity

    Iris Lauer;Kay Foetisch;Daniel Kolarich;Barbara K. Ballmer-Weber

  • The role of glycosylation in IBD

    Evropi Theodoratou;Harry Campbell;Nicholas T. Ventham;Daniel Kolarich

  • Localisation and distribution of the major allergens in apple fruits

    Gorji Marzban;Helene Puehringer;Rickmer Dey;Sabine Brynda

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicolle H. Packer
Nicolle H. Packer Macquarie University
Friedrich Altmann
Friedrich Altmann BOKU University
Peter H. Seeberger
Peter H. Seeberger Max Planck Society
Manfred Wuhrer
Manfred Wuhrer Leiden University Medical Center
Niclas G. Karlsson
Niclas G. Karlsson University of Gothenburg
Joseph Zaia
Joseph Zaia Boston University
Frédérique Lisacek
Frédérique Lisacek University of Geneva
Kiyoko F. Aoki-Kinoshita
Kiyoko F. Aoki-Kinoshita Soka University of America
Hans Peter Schwarz
Hans Peter Schwarz Baxter (United States)
Celso A. Reis
Celso A. Reis University of Porto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a diverse range of online degrees and healthcare career paths. For example, an online nutrition degree is a great choice for those interested in the science of food, dietetics, and wellness. Such programs can lead to certified nutritionist or dietitian roles in various settings.

Many biology graduates also pursue nursing. If you are already a registered nurse, enrolling in one of the rn to bsn programs can help advance your credentials and career opportunities. For those looking to move into healthcare leadership, consider one of the fastest online master's in healthcare administration programs for a quick and flexible route.

Demand for mental health professionals is also growing. Aspiring specialists can check out psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online. These programs are ideal for those passionate about mental wellness and patient care. Each of these options helps biology-focused students build rewarding and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Kolarich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles