World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
105
Citations
40739
World Ranking
1195
National Ranking
711

Chemistry

D-Index
97
Citations
31369
World Ranking
1476
National Ranking
566

Carlito B. Lebrilla publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlito B. Lebrilla sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 605 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Carlito B. Lebrilla D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlito B. Lebrilla sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Error in OpenAI API call: Error code: 500 - {'error': {'message': 'The server had an error while processing your request. Sorry about that!', 'type': 'server_error', 'param': None, 'code': None}}

Best Publications

  • Microbiota-activated PPAR-γ signaling inhibits dysbiotic Enterobacteriaceae expansion

    Mariana X. Byndloss;Erin E. Olsan;Fabian Rivera-Chávez;Connor R. Tiffany

  • The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals adaptations for milk utilization within the infant microbiome.

    D. A. Sela;J. Chapman;A. Adeuya;J. H. Kim

  • Depletion of Butyrate-Producing Clostridia from the Gut Microbiota Drives an Aerobic Luminal Expansion of Salmonella

    Fabian Rivera-Chávez;Lillian F. Zhang;Franziska Faber;Christopher A. Lopez

  • Human milk glycobiome and its impact on the infant gastrointestinal microbiota

    Angela M. Zivkovic;J. Bruce German;Carlito B. Lebrilla;David A. Mills

  • Sialylated Milk Oligosaccharides Promote Microbiota-Dependent Growth in Models of Infant Undernutrition

    Mark R. Charbonneau;David O'Donnell;Laura V. Blanton;Sarah M. Totten

  • Bacteroides in the Infant Gut Consume Milk Oligosaccharides via Mucus-Utilization Pathways

    Angela Marcobal;Mariana Barboza;Erica D. Sonnenburg;Nicholas Pudlo

  • Consumption of human milk oligosaccharides by gut-related microbes.

    Angela Marcobal;Mariana Barboza;John W. Froehlich;David E. Block

  • A strategy for annotating the human milk glycome

    Milady R Ninonuevo;Youmie Park;Hongfeng Yin;Jinhua Zhang

  • Glycans In The Immune system and The Altered Glycan Theory of Autoimmunity: A Critical Review

    Emanual Michael Maverakis;Kyoungmi Kim;Michiko Shimoda;M. Eric Gershwin

  • Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis: champion colonizer of the infant gut

    Mark A. Underwood;J. Bruce German;Carlito B. Lebrilla;David A. Mills

  • Breast Milk Oligosaccharides: Structure-Function Relationships in the Neonate

    Jennifer T. Smilowitz;Carlito B. Lebrilla;David A. Mills;J. Bruce German

  • Maternal fucosyltransferase 2 status affects the gut bifidobacterial communities of breastfed infants

    Zachery T. Lewis;Sarah M. Totten;Jennifer T. Smilowitz;Mina Popovic

  • Oligosaccharide analysis by mass spectrometry: A review of recent developments

    Muchena J. Kailemia;L. Renee Ruhaak;Carlito B. Lebrilla;I. Jonathan Amster

  • Protein composition of the intranuclear inclusions of FXTAS

    C. K. Iwahashi;D. H. Yasui;H. J. An;C. M. Greco

  • Mass Spectrometry Approaches to Glycomic and Glycoproteomic Analyses.

    L. Renee Ruhaak;Gege Xu;Qiongyu Li;Elisha Goonatilleke

  • In vitro fermentation of breast milk oligosaccharides by Bifidobacterium infantis and Lactobacillus gasseri.

    Robert E. Ward;Milady Niñonuevo;David A. Mills;Carlito B. Lebrilla

  • Glycoprofiling of bifidobacterial consumption of human milk oligosaccharides demonstrates strain specific, preferential consumption of small chain glycans secreted in early human lactation.

    Riccardo G. LoCascio;Milady R. Ninonuevo;Samara L. Freeman;David A. Sela

  • Glycans and glycoproteins as specific biomarkers for cancer

    Muchena J. Kailemia;Dayoung Park;Carlito B. Lebrilla

  • Isolation and Characterization of Soluble Boron Complexes in Higher Plants (The Mechanism of Phloem Mobility of Boron)

    Hening Hu;Sharron C. Penn;Carlito B. Lebrilla;Patrick H. Brown

  • Determination of glycosylation sites and site-specific heterogeneity in glycoproteins.

    Hyun Joo An;John W Froehlich;Carlito B Lebrilla

  • High-Mannose Glycans are Elevated during Breast Cancer Progression

    Maria Lorna A. de Leoz;Lawrence J.T. Young;Hyun Joo An;Scott R. Kronewitter

  • Glycomics and disease markers.

    Hyun Joo An;Scott R Kronewitter;Maria Lorna A de Leoz;Carlito B Lebrilla

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Bruce German
J. Bruce German University of California, Davis
David A. Mills
David A. Mills University of California, Davis
Helmut Schwarz
Helmut Schwarz Technical University of Berlin
Kit S. Lam
Kit S. Lam University of California, Davis
Jerry L. Hedrick
Jerry L. Hedrick University of California, Davis
Emanual Michael Maverakis
Emanual Michael Maverakis University of California, Davis
Jay V. Solnick
Jay V. Solnick University of California, Davis
Raymond L. Rodriguez
Raymond L. Rodriguez University of California, Davis
Wolfram Koch
Wolfram Koch German Chemical Society (Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker)
Paul J. Hagerman
Paul J. Hagerman University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, many of which can be enhanced by online education. For those interested in pharmaceuticals, understanding how much do drug reps make is crucial, as it helps gauge the financial potential in pharmaceutical sales roles.

If you aim to become a healthcare professional, it’s important to know how long does it take to become a pharmacist. This pathway requires extensive education and training but offers rewarding career opportunities in medication therapy and patient care.

For those drawn to forensic science, becoming an autopsy technician presents an engaging and vital role within the criminal justice system. You can explore education requirements and job prospects in detail via the guide on autopsy technician jobs.

Additionally, pursuing affordable education is often a priority. Students seeking cost-effective options should consider the cheapest online forensic science degree programs, which provide flexibility and affordability without compromising on quality.

Best Scientists Citing Carlito B. Lebrilla

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles