World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9705 9079 5126 4677 76 8514

Elizabeth Redcay publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth Redcay between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth Redcay published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2024. 19 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2024. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 9 publications
2004 2025

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth Redcay: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 4
2009 0
2010 2
2011 0
2012 3
2013 8
2014 3
2015 4
2016 7
2017 3
2018 6
2019 8
2020 7
2021 9
2022 5
2023 8
2024 10
2025 9
Total 102
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Redcay publications per year - data summary

  • Elizabeth Redcay, a Psychology scholar from University of Maryland, College Park, has 102 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 10 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2004 and 2006, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 22 years in the span carry no publications at all (2009 and 2011).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.1 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 41 publications, 40% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 12 publications (1.5 per year); 2012-2019: 42 publications (5.3 per year); 2020-2025: 48 publications (8.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Elizabeth Redcay publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Redcay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 76
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Redcay publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Elizabeth Redcay, a Psychology scholar from University of Maryland, College Park, records 76 publications - the 7th percentile of the discipline.
  • 7% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Elizabeth Redcay, and about 93% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Elizabeth Redcay ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Elizabeth Redcay D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Redcay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Redcay D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Elizabeth Redcay, a Psychology scholar from University of Maryland, College Park, records 35 D-Index - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Elizabeth Redcay, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Elizabeth Redcay ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Elizabeth Redcay is a researcher affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park, in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a strong focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology. Their work also engages with aspects of Social Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The main research topics addressed by Elizabeth Redcay include

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies

Elizabeth Redcay has published in various scholarly venues. These include Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Autism, Human Brain Mapping, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and the Journal of Research on Adolescence.

Their recent publications include the following:

  • Longitudinal Change in Adolescent Depression and Anxiety Symptoms from before to during the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2022, Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Interpersonal Synchrony in Autism, 2020, Current Psychiatry Reports
  • Synchrony Across Brains, 2024, Annual Review of Psychology
  • Theory of mind in naturalistic conversations between autistic and typically developing children and adolescents, 2022, Autism
  • A conceptual model of risk and protective factors associated with internalizing symptoms in autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review, synthesis, and call for more research, 2020, Development and Psychopathology

Frequent coauthors in Elizabeth Redcay's publications include Heather A. Yarger, Sarah L. Dziura, Kathryn McNaughton, Diana Alkire, and Junaid S. Merchant.

Best Publications

  • Mapping early brain development in autism.

    Eric Courchesne;Karen Pierce;Cynthia M. Schumann;Elizabeth Redcay

  • When Is the Brain Enlarged in Autism? A Meta-Analysis of All Brain Size Reports

    Elizabeth Redcay;Eric Courchesne;Eric Courchesne

  • Failing to deactivate: Resting functional abnormalities in autism

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Elizabeth Redcay;Eric Courchesne

  • Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction

    Elizabeth Redcay;Leonhard Schilbach

  • The superior temporal sulcus performs a common function for social and speech perception: implications for the emergence of autism.

    Elizabeth Redcay

  • Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience

    Elizabeth Redcay;David Dodell-Feder;Mark J. Pearrow;Penelope L. Mavros

  • The autistic brain: birth through adulthood.

    Eric Courchesne;Elizabeth Redcay;Daniel P Kennedy

  • Autism at the beginning: microstructural and growth abnormalities underlying the cognitive and behavioral phenotype of autism.

    Eric Courchesne;Elizabeth Redcay;John T. Morgan;Daniel P. Kennedy

  • Deviant functional magnetic resonance imaging patterns of brain activity to speech in 2-3-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder.

    Elizabeth Redcay;Eric Courchesne;Eric Courchesne

  • Similar brain activation during false belief tasks in a large sample of adults with and without autism

    Nicholas Dufour;Elizabeth Redcay;Liane Young;Penelope L. Mavros

  • Fusiform Function in Children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder Is a Matter of “Who”

    Karen Pierce;Elizabeth Redcay

  • Intrinsic functional network organization in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

    Elizabeth Redcay;Joseph M Moran;Joseph M Moran;Penelope Lee Mavros;Helen Tager-Flusberg

  • Eye-Tracking, Autonomic, and Electrophysiological Correlates of Emotional Face Processing in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Jennifer B. Wagner;Jennifer B. Wagner;Suzanna B. Hirsch;Vanessa K. Vogel-Farley;Elizabeth Redcay

  • Look at this: the neural correlates of initiating and responding to bids for joint attention

    Elizabeth Redcay;Mario Kleiner;Rebecca Saxe

  • Minimal coherence among varied theory of mind measures in childhood and adulthood

    Katherine Rice Warnell;Elizabeth Redcay

  • Atypical brain activation patterns during a face-to-face joint attention game in adults with autism spectrum disorder.

    Elizabeth Redcay;David Dodell-Feder;Penelope L. Mavros;Mario Kleiner

  • Functional neuroimaging of speech perception during a pivotal period in language acquisition

    Elizabeth Redcay;Frank Haist;Eric Courchesne

  • Interpersonal Synchrony in Autism.

    Kathryn A McNaughton;Elizabeth Redcay

  • fMRI during natural sleep as a method to study brain function during early childhood.

    Elizabeth Redcay;Daniel P. Kennedy;Eric Courchesne;Eric Courchesne

  • Developmental Differences in Relations Between Episodic Memory and Hippocampal Subregion Volume During Early Childhood

    Tracy Riggins;Sarah L. Blankenship;Elizabeth Mulligan;Katherine Rice

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Courchesne
Eric Courchesne University of California, San Diego
Daniel P. Kennedy
Daniel P. Kennedy Indiana University
Robert W. Cox
Robert W. Cox National Institutes of Health
Gang Chen
Gang Chen National Institutes of Health
Leonhard Schilbach
Leonhard Schilbach Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Liane Young
Liane Young Boston College
Nathan A. Fox
Nathan A. Fox University of Maryland, College Park
Helen Tager-Flusberg
Helen Tager-Flusberg Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, both online and on campus. One popular path is becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). Each state and city may have unique licensing requirements, so it’s important to research your intended location.

For example, those interested in mft requirements in Chula Vista will need to meet specific educational and supervised experience criteria. Similarly, if you’re exploring opportunities in Ohio, learning about mft requirements in Cincinnati or how to become an mft in Cleveland is essential to understand the local regulations.

Online degree programs can provide the foundational education needed, but be sure to verify that your coursework aligns with state licensing rules. For instance, understanding Colorado Springs mft education requirements can help you plan your academic journey. Exploring these career pathways and related online degrees ensures you meet your goals and comply with professional standards wherever you choose to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Redcay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles