World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
30819
World Ranking
12178
National Ranking
6245

James M. Boyett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Boyett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 261 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James M. Boyett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Boyett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Best Publications

  • Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation.

    Ching Hon Pui;Dario Campana;Deqing Pei;W. Paul Bowman

  • Metastasis Stage, Adjuvant Treatment, and Residual Tumor Are Prognostic Factors for Medulloblastoma in Children: Conclusions From the Children's Cancer Group 921 Randomized Phase III Study

    Paul M. Zeltzer;James M. Boyett;Jonathan L. Finlay;A. Leland Albright

  • Treatment of Children With Medulloblastomas With Reduced-Dose Craniospinal Radiation Therapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Children's Cancer Group Study

    Roger J. Packer;Joel Goldwein;H. Stacy Nicholson;L. Gilbert Vezina

  • Intellectual Outcome After Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Medulloblastoma: A Children’s Cancer Group Study

    M. Douglas Ris;Roger Packer;Joel Goldwein;Dana Jones-Wallace

  • Outcome for children with medulloblastoma treated with radiation and cisplatin, CCNU, and vincristine chemotherapy

    Packer Rj;Sutton Ln;Elterman R;Lange B

  • Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    William E. Evans;Mary V. Relling;John H. Rodman;William R. Crom

  • Methods to Detect P-Glycoprotein-associated Multidrug Resistance in Patients' Tumors: Consensus Recommendations

    William T. Beck;Thomas M. Grogan;Cheryl L. Willman;Carlos Cordon-Cardo

  • Multiagent Chemotherapy and Deferred Radiotherapy in Infants With Malignant Brain Tumors: A Report From the Children’s Cancer Group

    J. Russell Geyer;Richard Sposto;Mark Jennings;James M. Boyett

  • Survival and prognostic factors following radiation therapy and chemotherapy for ependymomas in children: a report of the Children's Cancer Group

    Patricia L. Robertson;Paul M. Zeltzer;James M. Boyett;Lucy B. Rorke

  • Randomized phase III trial in childhood high-grade astrocytoma comparing vincristine, lomustine, and prednisone with the eight-drugs-in-1-day regimen. Childrens Cancer Group

    J L Finlay;J M Boyett;A J Yates;J H Wisoff

  • Secondary brain tumors in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia at St Jude Children's Research hospital

    Andrew W. Walter;Michael L. Hancock;Ching Hon Pui;Melissa M. Hudson

  • Low-Stage Medulloblastoma: Final Analysis of Trial Comparing Standard-Dose With Reduced-Dose Neuraxis Irradiation

    Patrick R.M. Thomas;Melvin Deutsch;James L. Kepner;James M. Boyett

  • Expression of p53 and prognosis in children with malignant gliomas.

    Ian F. Pollack;Sydney D. Finkelstein;Jeffrey Woods;Judith Burnham

  • A phase I trial of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory low-grade glioma: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC) study

    Anuradha Banerjee;Regina I. Jakacki;Arzu Onar-Thomas;Shengjie Wu

  • Low-grade astrocytoma: a decade of experience at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

    Amar Gajjar;Robert A. Sanford;Richard Heideman;Jesse J. Jenkins

  • Long-term results of Total Therapy studies 11, 12 and 13A for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia at St Jude Children's Research Hospital.

    C. H. Pui;J. M. Boyett;G. K. Rivera;M. L. Hancock

  • Adenocarcinoma of the prostate in cystoprostatectomy specimens removed for bladder cancer.

    James E. Montie;David P. Wood;J. Edson Pontes;James M. Boyett

  • Survival of infants with primitive neuroectodermal tumors or malignant ependymomas of the CNS treated with eight drugs in 1 day: a report from the Childrens Cancer Group.

    J R Geyer;P M Zeltzer;J M Boyett;L B Rorke

  • TEL gene rearrangement in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a new genetic marker with prognostic significance.

    J. E. Rubnitz;J. R. Downing;C. H. Pui;S. A. Shurtleff

  • Carboplatin and Vincristine Chemotherapy for Children with Newly Diagnosed Progressive Low-Grade Gliomas

    R J Packer;J Ater;J Allen;P Phillips

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry E. Kun
Larry E. Kun St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Roger J. Packer
Roger J. Packer Children’s National Health System
Ian F. Pollack
Ian F. Pollack University of Pittsburgh
Jonathan L. Finlay
Jonathan L. Finlay Nationwide Children's Hospital
Ching-Hon Pui
Ching-Hon Pui St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Amar Gajjar
Amar Gajjar St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Gaston K. Rivera
Gaston K. Rivera St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
William E. Evans
William E. Evans St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Clinton F. Stewart
Clinton F. Stewart St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Mary V. Relling
Mary V. Relling St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up diverse pathways for medical careers, whether you’re seeking clinical roles or supportive positions in healthcare. Many students begin by looking for the cheapest bsn programs to complete their Bachelor of Science in Nursing, often while working or balancing family commitments.

For those with a non-nursing background who aspire to advance quickly, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors offer a fast track to graduate-level nursing credentials. These programs are ideal if you want to pivot into nursing without a prior degree in the field.

If you're seeking a more accessible route, the easiest rn program to get into may help you launch your nursing career, especially if you’re concerned about competitive admissions.

Prefer a non-clinical role? medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid can be a practical and flexible option for entering the healthcare industry with strong job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Boyett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles