World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
María Cecilia Angulo

María Cecilia Angulo

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 33 9412 8684 460 420 51 6717

María Cecilia Angulo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by María Cecilia Angulo between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. María Cecilia Angulo published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2015. 11 of the 65 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2015. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
1997 2025

65 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
María Cecilia Angulo: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 3
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 1
2014 0
2015 8
2016 1
2017 3
2018 2
2019 8
2020 6
2021 4
2022 1
2023 3
2024 7
2025 4
Total 65
Download as CSV

María Cecilia Angulo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María Cecilia Angulo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 48–57 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 51 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79 51
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

María Cecilia Angulo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María Cecilia Angulo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172 33
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

María Cecilia Angulo is affiliated with the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Poland. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with particular attention to developmental neuroscience, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Anesthesia and neurotoxicity research
  • Stress responses and cortisol
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

Recent notable publications by María Cecilia Angulo include:

  • "Myelination of parvalbumin interneurons shapes the function of cortical sensory inhibitory circuits" (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • "Sex-Specific Cognitive Deficits Following Space Radiation Exposure" (2020), published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • "Functional myelin in cognition and neurodevelopmental disorders" (2024), published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
  • "Multiple sclerosis iPS-derived oligodendroglia conserve their properties to functionally interact with axons and glia in vivo" (2020), published in Science Advances
  • "Detrimental impacts of mixed-ion radiation on nervous system function" (2021), published in Neurobiology of Disease

The scientist often collaborates with several coauthors who have contributed frequently to their work. These include Blandine Manot-Saillet, Chloé Habermacher, Vipan K. Parihar, Charles L. Limoli, and Hasni Khelfaoui.

María Cecilia Angulo's contributions have been published predominantly in journals such as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Preprints.org, and Nature Communications.

Best Publications

  • Neuron-to-astrocyte signaling is central to the dynamic control of brain microcirculation

    Micaela Zonta;María Cecilia Angulo;Sara Gobbo;Bernhard Rosengarten

  • Molecular and Physiological Diversity of Cortical Nonpyramidal Cells

    Bruno Cauli;Etienne Audinat;Bertrand Lambolez;Maria Cecilia Angulo

  • Glutamate Released from Glial Cells Synchronizes Neuronal Activity in the Hippocampus

    María Cecilia Angulo;Andreï S Kozlov;Serge Charpak;Etienne Audinat

  • Target cell-specific modulation of neuronal activity by astrocytes

    A. S. Kozlov;M. C. Angulo;E. Audinat;S. Charpak

  • Nonsynaptic junctions on myelinating glia promote preferential myelination of electrically active axons

    Hiroaki Wake;Fernando C. Ortiz;Dong Ho Woo;Philip R. Lee

  • Tonic activation of NMDA receptors by ambient glutamate of non‐synaptic origin in the rat hippocampus

    Karim Le Meur;Micaela Galante;María Cecilia Angulo;Etienne Audinat

  • Subunit Composition, Kinetic, and Permeation Properties of AMPA Receptors in Single Neocortical Nonpyramidal Cells

    Marı́a Cecilia Angulo;Bertrand Lambolez;Etienne Audinat;Shaul Hestrin

  • Postsynaptic glutamate receptors and integrative properties of fast-spiking interneurons in the rat neocortex.

    Maria Cecilia Angulo;Jean Rossier;Etienne Audinat

  • GABA, a forgotten gliotransmitter.

    María Cecilia Angulo;Karim Le Meur;Karim Le Meur;Karim Le Meur;Andrei S. Kozlov;Serge Charpak;Serge Charpak;Serge Charpak

  • Postnatal switch from synaptic to extrasynaptic transmission between interneurons and NG2 cells.

    Mateo Vélez-Fort;Paloma P. Maldonado;Arthur M. Butt;Etienne Audinat

  • Central Role of GABA in Neuron–Glia Interactions

    Mateo Vélez-Fort;Etienne Audinat;Etienne Audinat;Etienne Audinat;María Cecilia Angulo;María Cecilia Angulo;María Cecilia Angulo

  • Persistent nature of alterations in cognition and neuronal circuit excitability after exposure to simulated cosmic radiation in mice.

    Vipan K. Parihar;Mattia Maroso;Amber Syage;Barrett D. Allen

  • Neuronal activity in vivo enhances functional myelin repair.

    Fernando C. Ortiz;Chloé Habermacher;Mariana Graciarena;Pierre-Yves Houry

  • Myelination of parvalbumin interneurons shapes the function of cortical sensory inhibitory circuits.

    Najate Benamer;Marie Vidal;Maddalena Balia;Maddalena Balia;María Cecilia Angulo

  • Interneurons and oligodendrocyte progenitors form a structured synaptic network in the developing neocortex

    David Orduz;David Orduz;Paloma P Maldonado;Paloma P Maldonado;Maddalena Balia;Maddalena Balia;Mateo Vélez-Fort;Mateo Vélez-Fort

  • New Concerns for Neurocognitive Function during Deep Space Exposures to Chronic, Low Dose-Rate, Neutron Radiation.

    Munjal M Acharya;Janet E Baulch;Peter M Klein;Al Anoud D Baddour

  • Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells Are Accurate Sensors of Local K+ in Mature Gray Matter

    Paloma P. Maldonado;Paloma P. Maldonado;Paloma P. Maldonado;Mateo Vélez-Fort;Mateo Vélez-Fort;Mateo Vélez-Fort;Françoise Levavasseur;Françoise Levavasseur;Françoise Levavasseur;María Cecilia Angulo;María Cecilia Angulo;María Cecilia Angulo

  • Developmental synaptic changes increase the range of integrative capabilities of an identified excitatory neocortical connection.

    Marı́a Cecilia Angulo;Jochen F. Staiger;Jean Rossier;Etienne Audinat

  • Functional alpha 7-containing nicotinic receptors of NG2-expressing cells in the hippocampus.

    Mateo Vélez-Fort;Etienne Audinat;Etienne Audinat;María Cecilia Angulo;María Cecilia Angulo

  • Transient hypothyroidism favors oligodendrocyte generation providing functional remyelination in the adult mouse brain

    Sylvie Remaud;Fernando C Ortiz;Fernando C Ortiz;Fernando C Ortiz;Marine Perret-Jeanneret;Marie-Stéphane Aigrot

  • Alteration of synaptic connectivity of oligodendrocyte precursor cells following demyelination

    Aurélia Sahel;Fernando C. Ortiz;Christophe Kerninon;Christophe Kerninon;Christophe Kerninon;Paloma P. Maldonado;Paloma P. Maldonado

Frequent Co-Authors

Etienne Audinat
Etienne Audinat University of Montpellier
Jean Rossier
Jean Rossier Sorbonne University
Serge Charpak
Serge Charpak Pennsylvania State University
Csaba Fekete
Csaba Fekete Institute of Experimental Medicine
Tanja Kuhlmann
Tanja Kuhlmann University Hospital Münster
Giorgio Carmignoto
Giorgio Carmignoto National Research Council (CNR)
Guillermina López-Bendito
Guillermina López-Bendito Miguel Hernandez University
Shaul Hestrin
Shaul Hestrin Stanford University
Jack P. Antel
Jack P. Antel McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience is a dynamic field with connections to various academic and professional paths. When planning your education, it’s crucial to consider options that combine personal interest, career prospects, flexibility, and affordability.

Many students interested in brain science and healthcare also look into the highest paying majors to maximize their future earning potential. Combining neuroscience studies with related fields—such as data science or engineering—can boost your job outlook in competitive markets.

Access and affordability are essential factors. Choosing from accredited online colleges that accept fafsa allows for greater financial aid support, reducing out-of-pocket costs while earning a respected degree.

In addition to traditional degrees, online certificate programs can help you develop specialized skills quickly, making them an excellent choice for career advancement or transitioning to neuroscience-related fields.

For those seeking a quicker route, explore the easiest online degrees. These programs may offer greater flexibility and a quicker time to completion—ideal for those balancing work, family, or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing María Cecilia Angulo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles