World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2051 1860 1193 1056 197 20961

Margaret A. Sheridan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Margaret A. Sheridan between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Margaret A. Sheridan published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2020. 40 of the 262 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2020. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 22 publications
1981 2025

262 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Margaret A. Sheridan: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 5
2011 2
2012 2
2013 5
2014 16
2015 13
2016 16
2017 15
2018 10
2019 23
2020 28
2021 26
2022 27
2023 24
2024 18
2025 22
Total 262
Download as CSV

Margaret A. Sheridan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret A. Sheridan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 197
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Margaret A. Sheridan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret A. Sheridan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Margaret A. Sheridan is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with substantial contributions to clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, education, behavioral neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their work covers several main topics, including child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, child abuse and trauma, stress responses and cortisol, functional brain connectivity studies, early childhood education and development, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Margaret A. Sheridan has published extensively in a variety of academic venues. Frequently appearing publication venues include UNC Libraries, Biological Psychiatry, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Development and Psychopathology, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Sheridan include:

  • The Value of Dimensional Models of Early Experience: Thinking Clearly About Concepts and Categories (2021) in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Associations of Early-Life Threat and Deprivation With Executive Functioning in Childhood and Adolescence (2021) in JAMA Pediatrics
  • Reduced hippocampal and amygdala volume as a mechanism underlying stress sensitization to depression following childhood trauma (2020) in Depression and Anxiety
  • Alterations in neural circuits underlying emotion regulation following child maltreatment: a mechanism underlying trauma-related psychopathology (2020) in Psychological Medicine
  • Childhood socioeconomic status and the pace of structural neurodevelopment: accelerated, delayed, or simply different? (2023) in Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Margaret A. Sheridan include Katie A. McLaughlin, Nathan A. Fox, Charles H. Zeanah, Charles A. Nelson, and Adam Bryant Miller. These collaborations highlight a research network involved in developmental and clinical psychological science.

Best Publications

  • Childhood adversity and neural development: deprivation and threat as distinct dimensions of early experience

    Katie A. McLaughlin;Margaret A. Sheridan;Hilary K. Lambert

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Felix Holzmeister;Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber

  • Beyond Cumulative Risk: A Dimensional Approach to Childhood Adversity

    Katie A. McLaughlin;Margaret A. Sheridan

  • A review of adversity, the amygdala and the hippocampus: a consideration of developmental timing.

    Nim Tottenham;Margaret Ann Sheridan

  • Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries.

    Jeffrey M. Zacks;Todd S. Braver;Margaret A. Sheridan;David I. Donaldson

  • Family socioeconomic status and child executive functions: the roles of language, home environment, and single parenthood.

    Khaled Sarsour;Margaret Ann Sheridan;Douglas Jutte;Amani Nuru-Jeter

  • Dimensions of early experience and neural development: deprivation and threat

    Margaret A. Sheridan;Katie A. McLaughlin

  • Variation in neural development as a result of exposure to institutionalization early in childhood

    Margaret A. Sheridan;Nathan A. Fox;Charles H. Zeanah;Katie A. McLaughlin

  • Smaller Hippocampal Volume in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Multisite ENIGMA-PGC Study: Subcortical Volumetry Results From Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Consortia

    Mark W. Logue;Sanne J.H. van Rooij;Emily L. Dennis;Sarah L. Davis

  • Causal effects of the early caregiving environment on development of stress response systems in children.

    Katie A. McLaughlin;Margaret A. Sheridan;Florin Tibu;Nathan A. Fox

  • Reducing crime and violence: Experimental evidence from cognitive behavioral therapy in Liberia

    Christopher Blattman;Julian C. Jamison;Margaret Ann Sheridan

  • Child Maltreatment and Neural Systems Underlying Emotion Regulation

    Katie A. McLaughlin;Matthew Peverill;Andrea L. Gold;Sonia Alves

  • Widespread Reductions in Cortical Thickness Following Severe Early-Life Deprivation: A Neurodevelopmental Pathway to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Katie A. McLaughlin;Katie A. McLaughlin;Margaret A. Sheridan;Margaret A. Sheridan;Warren Winter;Nathan A. Fox

  • Impulsive Personality Predicts Dopamine-Dependent Changes in Frontostriatal Activity during Component Processes of Working Memory

    Roshan Cools;Margaret Sheridan;Emily Jacobs;Mark D'Esposito

  • The Value of Dimensional Models of Early Experience: Thinking Clearly About Concepts and Categories.

    Katie A McLaughlin;Margaret A Sheridan;Kathryn L Humphreys;Jay Belsky

  • Maltreatment Exposure, Brain Structure, and Fear Conditioning in Children and Adolescents

    Katie A McLaughlin;Margaret A Sheridan;Andrea L Gold;Andrea Duys

  • Difficulties with emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic mechanism linking child maltreatment with the emergence of psychopathology

    David G. Weissman;Debbie Bitran;Adam Bryant Miller;Jonathan D. Schaefer

  • The Impact of Social Disparity on Prefrontal Function in Childhood

    Margaret A. Sheridan;Margaret A. Sheridan;Khaled Sarsour;Douglas Jutte;Mark D'Esposito;Mark D'Esposito

  • Neglect as a Violation of Species-Expectant Experience: Neurodevelopmental Consequences

    Katie A. McLaughlin;Margaret A. Sheridan;Charles A. Nelson

  • Dimensions of childhood adversity have distinct associations with neural systems underlying executive functioning.

    Margaret A. Sheridan;Matthew Peverill;Amy S. Finn;Katie A. McLaughlin

  • Encoding Processes during Retrieval Tasks

    Randy L. Buckner;Mark E. Wheeler;Margaret A. Sheridan

Frequent Co-Authors

Katie A. McLaughlin
Katie A. McLaughlin University of Oregon
Charles A. Nelson
Charles A. Nelson Boston Children's Hospital
Charles H. Zeanah
Charles H. Zeanah Tulane University
Nathan A. Fox
Nathan A. Fox University of Maryland, College Park
Adam Bryant Miller
Adam Bryant Miller University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Kerry J. Ressler
Kerry J. Ressler Harvard University
Tanja Jovanovic
Tanja Jovanovic Wayne State University
Andrew N. Meltzoff
Andrew N. Meltzoff University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways, especially within the allied fields of social work and mental health. Many students expand their expertise by pursuing specialized online programs designed to prepare graduates for roles in therapy, counseling, and community outreach.

The best social work degrees in North Dakota highlight online and hybrid options tailored to working professionals and those in rural communities. Similarly, the best social work degrees in the Northeast present programs renowned for their flexible coursework and partnerships with leading healthcare institutions.

If you’re seeking affordable or regionally focused programs, consider the best social work degrees in Oklahoma, which offer unique opportunities to address local mental health needs. In urban areas, the best social work degree programs in Philadelphia connect students with a vibrant network of agencies and clinical placements.

Choosing an online psychology or social work degree is the first step toward diverse careers, from licensed therapists to social service managers, ensuring a strong foundation for making a positive impact in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret A. Sheridan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles