World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin L. Albert

Martin L. Albert

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
13229
World Ranking
4020
National Ranking
2253

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
14182
World Ranking
3975
National Ranking
1809

Martin L. Albert publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin L. Albert sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 197 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martin L. Albert D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin L. Albert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin L. Albert is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research spans several fields with a primary focus on Medicine and Engineering.

The main fields of study of Martin L. Albert include:

  • Medicine
  • Engineering

Within these broader fields, the following subfields have been identified:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgery
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Their research covers multiple topics, among which are:

  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety

Martin L. Albert has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Parameters associated with successful weaning of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review, 2022, Critical Care
  • Demographic Effects on Longitudinal Semantic Processing, Working Memory, and Cognitive Speed, 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Different feedback strategies: Evaluation of active vehicle motions in a multi-level system, 2022, AHFE international
  • Clinical Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Minute-by-Minute Impact of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Zorg voor jongeren met ernstige anorexia nervosa, 2024, Kind & Adolescent Praktijk

Their work has been published in various venues, with repeated publications in:

  • Critical Care
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • AHFE international
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Kind & Adolescent Praktijk

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Martin L. Albert include:

  • Yoan Lamarche
  • Alexis Cournoyer
  • Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas
  • Francis Charbonneau
  • Karina Chahinian

Best Publications

  • A simple test of visual neglect

    Martin L. Albert

  • The `subcortical dementia' of progressive supranuclear palsy

    Martin L. Albert;Robert G. Feldman;Anne L. Willis

  • Amnestic MCI or prodromal Alzheimer's disease?

    Bruno Dubois;Martin L Albert

  • Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia.

    Martin L. Albert;Robert W. Sparks;Nancy A. Helm

  • Varieties of perseveration.

    Jennifer Sandson;Jennifer Sandson;Martin L. Albert;Martin L. Albert

  • Aphasia rehabilitation resulting from melodic intonation therapy.

    Robert Sparks;Nancy Helm;Martin Albert

  • Clinical Neurology of Aging

    Martin L. Albert;Janice E. Knoefel

  • Severe nonfluency in aphasia. Role of the medial subcallosal fasciculus and other white matter pathways in recovery of spontaneous speech.

    Margaret A. Naeser;Carole L. Palumbo;Nancy Helm-Estabrooks;Denise Stiassny-Eder

  • The Bilingual Brain: Neuropsychological and Neurolinguistic Aspects of Bilingualism

    Martin L. Albert;Loraine K. Obler

  • Lexical retrieval in healthy aging.

    Marjorie Nicholas;Loraine Obler;Martin Albert;Harold Goodglass

  • Pure word deafness. Analysis of a case with bilateral lesions and a defect at the prephonemic level.

    Sanford H. Auerbach;Terry Allard;Margaret Naeser;Michael P. Alexander

  • Perseveration in behavioral neurology

    Jennifer Sandson;Martin L. Albert

  • Frontal systems impairment following multiple lacunar infarcts.

    Nicola Wolfe;Richard Linn;Viken L. Babikian;Janice E. Knoefel

  • Auditory comprehension and aging: Decline in syntactic processing

    Loraine K. Obler;Deborah Fein;Marjorie Nicholas;Martin L. Albert

  • Change in Object Naming Ability During Adulthood

    Lisa Tabor Connor;Avron Spiro;Loraine K. Obler;Martin L. Albert

  • Naming ability across the adult life span

    Rhoda Au;Philip Joung;Marjorie Nicholas;Loraine K. Obler

  • Naming Errors in Healthy Aging and Dementia of the Alzheimer Type

    Nancy L. Bowles;Loraine K. Obler;Loraine K. Obler;Martin L. Albert;Martin L. Albert

  • Word category aphasia

    Atsushi Yamadori;Martin L. Albert

  • Semantic Degradation and Lexical Access in Age-Related Naming Failures*

    Barbara A. Barresi;Marjorie Nicholas;Lisa Tabor Connor;Loraine K. Obler

  • Pharmacotherapy for aphasia.

    Martin L. Albert;David L. Bachman;Alisa Morgan;Nancy Helm-Estabrooks

  • TIME TO UNDERSTAND

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Loraine K. Obler
Loraine K. Obler City University of New York
Harold Goodglass
Harold Goodglass Boston University
Avron Spiro
Avron Spiro Boston University
Lisa Tabor Connor
Lisa Tabor Connor Washington University in St. Louis
Rhoda Au
Rhoda Au Boston University
Patrick J. McNamara
Patrick J. McNamara University of Iowa
Margaret A. Naeser
Margaret A. Naeser Boston University
Philip J. Langlais
Philip J. Langlais San Diego State University
Lorraine J. Gudas
Lorraine J. Gudas Cornell University
Howard Gardner
Howard Gardner Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, exploring related fields and education paths can broaden your opportunities. Many students consider most lucrative majors related to science, technology, and healthcare, which often overlap with neuroscience in both content and job prospects.

For those seeking flexible or affordable options, fafsa-approved online certificate programs make it possible to pursue quality education without a hefty price tag. Many universities now offer online certificates that can enhance your skills in neuroscience, psychology, or other health sciences, often leading to well-compensated roles in research and healthcare.

If you’re searching for alternative pathways, easy university programs allow you to earn a degree at your own pace, which can work well for those balancing studies and work. Whatever your goals, taking time to evaluate costs, career outcomes, and program flexibility is key to finding the right match.

Best Scientists Citing Martin L. Albert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles