World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 34 9392 8994 566 554 51 7124

Ina C. Meier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ina C. Meier between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ina C. Meier published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2018. 9 of the 67 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2018. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 5 publications
2005 2026

67 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ina C. Meier: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 3
2009 0
2010 1
2011 0
2012 1
2013 2
2014 2
2015 2
2016 2
2017 5
2018 7
2019 4
2020 6
2021 7
2022 5
2023 3
2024 5
2025 4
2026 5
Total 67
Download as CSV

Ina C. Meier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ina C. Meier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 51–60 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 51 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62 51
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Ina C. Meier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ina C. Meier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123 34
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Ina C. Meier is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and conducts research within agricultural and biological sciences as well as environmental science. Their scholarly work primarily focuses on plant science, nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, soil science, and ecology.

The scientist's main topics of research include soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, plant nutrient uptake and metabolism, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions, forest ecology and management, and plant and animal studies.

They have published multiple articles in prominent venues, with frequent contributions to the following journals:

  • New Phytologist
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • Plant and Soil
  • Frontiers in Forests and Global Change

Recent notable publications include:

  • The fungal collaboration gradient dominates the root economics space in plants (2020, Science Advances)
  • Root traits as drivers of plant and ecosystem functioning: current understanding, pitfalls and future research needs (2020, New Phytologist)
  • A starting guide to root ecology: strengthening ecological concepts and standardising root classification, sampling, processing and trait measurements (2021, New Phytologist)
  • An integrated framework of plant form and function: the belowground perspective (2021, New Phytologist)
  • Surplus Carbon Drives Allocation and Plant-Soil Interactions (2020, Trends in Ecology & Evolution)

Ina C. Meier collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Alexandra Weigelt, Oscar J. Valverde-Barrantes, Grégoire T. Freschet, Colleen M. Iversen, and Michael McCormack.

Best Publications

  • The fungal collaboration gradient dominates the root economics space in plants.

    Joana Bergmann;Alexandra Weigelt;Fons van der Plas;Daniel C. Laughlin

  • Root traits as drivers of plant and ecosystem functioning: current understanding, pitfalls and future research needs

    Grégoire T Freschet;Grégoire T Freschet;Catherine Roumet;Louise H Comas;Monique Weemstra

  • An integrated framework of plant form and function: The belowground perspective

    Alexandra Weigelt;Liesje Mommer;Karl Andraczek;Colleen M. Iversen

  • Roots and fungi accelerate carbon and nitrogen cycling in forests exposed to elevated CO2.

    Richard P. Phillips;Ina C. Meier;Emily S. Bernhardt;A. Stuart Grandy

  • Root exudates increase N availability by stimulating microbial turnover of fast-cycling N pools

    Ina C. Meier;Adrien C. Finzi;Richard P. Phillips

  • Surplus Carbon Drives Allocation and Plant–Soil Interactions

    Cindy E. Prescott;Sue J. Grayston;Heljä Sisko Helmisaari;Eva Kaštovská

  • Belowground drought response of European beech: fine root biomass and carbon partitioning in 14 mature stands across a precipitation gradient

    Ina C. Meier;Christoph Leuschner

  • Root exudates induce soil macroaggregation facilitated by fungi in subsoil

    Vera Luise Baumert;Nadezda Vasilyeva;Artem Vladimirov;Ina Christin Meier

  • Leaf Size and Leaf Area Index in Fagus sylvatica Forests: Competing Effects of Precipitation, Temperature, and Nitrogen Availability

    Ina C. Meier;Christoph Leuschner

  • Global root traits (GRooT) database

    Nathaly R. Guerrero-Ramírez;Liesje Mommer;Grégoire T. Freschet;Colleen M. Iversen

  • Genotypic variation and phenotypic plasticity in the drought response of fine roots of European beech

    Ina C. Meier;Christoph Leuschner

  • Root traits explain plant species distributions along climatic gradients yet challenge the nature of ecological trade-offs

    Daniel C. Laughlin;Liesje Mommer;Francesco Maria Sabatini;Helge Bruelheide

  • On the niche breadth of Fagus sylvatica: soil nutrient status in 50 Central European beech stands on a broad range of bedrock types

    Christoph Leuschner;Ina C. Meier;Dietrich Hertel

  • Variation of soil and biomass carbon pools in beech forests across a precipitation gradient

    Ina C. Meier;Ina C. Meier;Christoph Leuschner

  • Root exudation of mature beech forests across a nutrient availability gradient: the role of root morphology and fungal activity

    Ina C. Meier;Timo Tückmantel;Julian Heitkötter;Karolin Müller

  • The mycorrhizal type governs root exudation and nitrogen uptake of temperate tree species.

    Rebecca Liese;Torben Lübbe;Nora W Albers;Ina C Meier

  • Root Branching Is a Leading Root Trait of the Plant Economics Spectrum in Temperate Trees.

    Rebecca Liese;Katrin Alings;Ina C. Meier

  • The rhizosphere and hyphosphere differ in their impacts on carbon and nitrogen cycling in forests exposed to elevated CO2

    Ina C. Meier;Seth G. Pritchard;Edward R. Brzostek;M. Luke McCormack

  • The handbook for standardized field and laboratory measurements in terrestrial climate change experiments and observational studies (ClimEx)

    Aud Helen Halbritter Rechsteiner;Hans J. De Boeck;Amy Elizabeth Eycott;Amy Elizabeth Eycott;Sabine Reinsch

  • Root exudation patterns in a beech forest: Dependence on soil depth, root morphology, and environment

    Timo Tückmantel;Christoph Leuschner;Sebastian Preusser;Ellen Kandeler

  • Fungal communities influence root exudation rates in pine seedlings

    Ina C. Meier;Peter G. Avis;Richard P. Phillips

  • Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity increases phosphorus uptake efficiency of European beech

    Julia Köhler;Nan Yang;Rodica Pena;Venket Raghavan

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Leuschner
Christoph Leuschner University of Göttingen
Grégoire T. Freschet
Grégoire T. Freschet Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Hendrik Poorter
Hendrik Poorter Forschungszentrum Jülich
M. Luke McCormack
M. Luke McCormack Morton Arboretum
Catherine Roumet
Catherine Roumet University of Montpellier
Alexandra Weigelt
Alexandra Weigelt Leipzig University
Fons van der Plas
Fons van der Plas Wageningen University & Research
Liesje Mommer
Liesje Mommer Wageningen University & Research
Colleen M. Iversen
Colleen M. Iversen Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Thomas W. Kuyper
Thomas W. Kuyper Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise in Environmental Sciences or branching into related fields, exploring diverse online degree options is essential. Programs such as eds to edd bridge programs online provide educators with a pathway to advanced leadership roles, integrating environmental education with impactful policy-making.

Social work also intersects with environmental issues, especially in community health and sustainability initiatives. Individuals passionate about this can consider dsw programs online, which focus on practical leadership skills to address social and environmental justice.

For learners seeking flexibility, an accredited affordable online general studies degree can offer broad knowledge applicable to various environmental careers, allowing students to tailor their education to their interests and professional goals.

Those new to higher education or looking for a streamlined start might explore the easiest bachelor degree to get options online, balancing accessibility with foundational skills relevant to environmental science roles. These diverse pathways highlight the growing availability of flexible and affordable online education options for dynamic career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Ina C. Meier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles