World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
11851
World Ranking
4961
National Ranking
2723

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
11851
World Ranking
5263
National Ranking
2354

Laird S. Cermak publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laird S. Cermak sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Laird S. Cermak D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laird S. Cermak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laird S. Cermak was affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research focused primarily on the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular emphasis on Molecular Biology as well as related subfields such as Immunology, Oncology, Genetics, and Plant Science.

The scientist's research topics covered a range of molecular and cellular processes, including:

  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction

Cermak authored several papers that contributed to these areas. Notable publications included:

  • CRL4-DCAF12 Ubiquitin Ligase Controls MOV10 RNA Helicase during Spermatogenesis and T Cell Activation, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • FBXO38 Ubiquitin Ligase Controls Sertoli Cell Maturation, 2022, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • FBXO38 Ubiquitin Ligase Controls Centromere Integrity via ZXDA/B Stability, 2022, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • FBXO38 is dispensable for PD-1 regulation, 2024, EMBO Reports
  • Differential requirements for Smarca5 expression during hematopoietic stem cell commitment, 2024, Communications Biology

Cermak frequently collaborated with other researchers, notably:

  • Nikol Dibus
  • Karolína Kolářová
  • Vladimír Kořínek
  • Radislav Sedláček
  • Alikhan Abdirov

The publication venues where their work appeared also showed diversity, including:

  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • EMBO Reports
  • Communications Biology

Best Publications

  • Levels of processing in human memory.

    Laird S. Cermak;Fergus I. M. Craik

  • Profiles of demented and amnesic patients on the California verbal learning test : implications for the assessment of memory disorders

    Dean C. Delis;Paul J. Massman;Nelson Butters;David P. Salmon

  • Effects of Elaboration of Processing at Encoding and Retrieval: Trace Distinctiveness and Recovery of Initial Context

    Laird S. Cermak;Fergus I.M. Craik

  • Reduced Cerebral Grey Matter Observed in Alcoholics Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Terry L. Jernigan;Nelson Butters;Nelson Butters;Gina DiTraglia;Kimberly Schafer

  • Alcoholic Korsakoff's syndrome : an information-processing approach to amnesia

    Nelson Butters;Laird S. Cermak

  • The anterograde and retrograde retrieval ability of a patient with amnesia due to encephalitis

    Laird S. Cermak;Margaret O'Connor

  • Memory disorders associated with Huntington's disease: verbal recall, verbal recognition and procedural memory.

    Nelson Butters;Nelson Butters;Jessica Wolfe;Jessica Wolfe;Maryann Martone;Maryann Martone;Eric Granholm

  • The perceptual priming phenomenon in amnesia.

    Laird S. Cermak;Nancy Talbot;Karen Chandler;Lynn Reale Wolbarst

  • Differentiation of amnesic and demented patients with the wechsler memory scale -revised

    Nelson Butters;David P. Salmon;C. Munro Cullum;Patricia Cairns

  • Intact delay-eyeblink classical conditioning in amnesia.

    John D. E. Gabrieli;Regina McGlinchey-Berroth;Regina McGlinchey-Berroth;Maria C. Carrillo;Mark A. Gluck

  • The dissociation of anterograde and retrograde amnesia in a patient with herpes encephalitis

    Margaret O'connor;Nelson Butters;Patti Miliotis;Paul Eslinger

  • Some analyses of the verbal encoding deficit of alcoholic Korsakoff patients

    Laird S. Cermak;Laird S. Cermak;Nelson Butters;Nelson Butters;Judith Moreines;Judith Moreines

  • The role of interference and encoding in the short-term memory deficits of Korsakoff patients.

    Laird S. Cermak;Nelson Butters

  • The encoding capacity of a patient with amnesia due to encephalitis

    L. S. Cermak

  • The extent of the verbal encoding ability of Korsakoff patients

    Laird S. Cermak;Laird S. Cermak;Nelson Butters;Nelson Butters;John Gerrein;John Gerrein

  • Some Analyses of Amnesic Syndromes in Brain-Damaged Patients

    Nelson Butters;Laird Cermak

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of alcoholic Korsakoff patients.

    Jernigan Tl;Schafer K;Butters N;Cermak Ls

  • A case study of the forgetting of autobiographical knowledge: Implications for the study of retrograde amnesia.

    Nelson Butters;Laird S. Cermak

  • The extent of memory loss in Korsakoff patients.

    Laird S. Cermak;Nelson Butters;Harold Goodglass

  • Deficits in the implicit retention of new associations by alcoholic Korsakoff patients.

    Laird S. Cermak;Rebecca Pratt Bleich;Susan P. Blackford

  • An Elaborative Processing Explanation of Depth of Processing

    Laird S. Cermak;Fergus I.M. Craik

  • Four Points to Remember: A Tetrahedral Model of Memory Experiments

    Laird S. Cermak;Fergus I.M. Craik

  • Perspectives on Memory Research@@@Levels of Processing in Human Memory

    Eugene B. Zechmeister;Lars-Goran Nilsson;Laird S. Cermak;Fergus I. M. Craik

Frequent Co-Authors

Nelson Butters
Nelson Butters University of California, San Diego
Mieke Verfaellie
Mieke Verfaellie Boston University
Terry L. Jernigan
Terry L. Jernigan University of California, San Diego
Marc A. Schuckit
Marc A. Schuckit University of California, San Diego
Michael R. Irwin
Michael R. Irwin University of California, Los Angeles
Harold Goodglass
Harold Goodglass Boston University
Paula K. Shear
Paula K. Shear University of Cincinnati
William P. Milberg
William P. Milberg Boston University
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Larry L. Jacoby
Larry L. Jacoby Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of fulfilling career options. Many students choose to pursue advanced credentials online, making it easier to balance work, family, and education. Programs typically include coursework in counseling, mental health, behavioral science, and research methods.

If you’re interested in specializing as a therapist, there are several pathways to consider. For example, those looking to work with couples and families might explore how to become a marriage and family therapist in Fort Wayne or explore how to become an mft in Fort Worth. Each location has slightly different requirements and licensing processes.

Additionally, understanding the Fremont mft certification requirements and Fresno mft certification requirements can help you determine the best educational and career pathway for your goals, whether you plan to practice locally or explore opportunities in different regions. Researching these pathways early will ensure you meet all necessary criteria for future certification.

Best Scientists Citing Laird S. Cermak

Recently Published Articles