World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
8678
World Ranking
5374
National Ranking
316

Ron Kupers publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ron Kupers sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 170 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ron Kupers D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ron Kupers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ron Kupers is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada and specializes in neuroscience research. Their body of work primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience, with notable contributions also in radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cellular and molecular neuroscience, sensory systems, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research covers several main topics including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Among recent publications are the following papers:

  • Brain Morphological Modifications in Congenital and Acquired Auditory Deprivation: A Systematic Review and Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Metabolic underpinnings of activated and deactivated cortical areas in human brain, 2021, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • Spatial navigation with horizontally spatialized sounds in early and late blind individuals, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • A quantitative analysis of the retinofugal projections in congenital and late-onset blindness, 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Brain structural changes in blindness: a systematic review and an anatomical likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis, 2023, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Ron Kupers has published extensively in several venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • PLoS ONE

They have also contributed a book titled Brain Plasticity Following Sensory Loss: From Basic Mechanisms to Therapy, published by Frontiers Media in 2023.

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Laurence Dricot
  • Maurice Ptito
  • Samuel Paré
  • Maxime Bleau
  • Anaïs Grégoire

Best Publications

  • Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind.

    Maurice Ptito;Solvej M Moesgaard;Albert Gjedde;Rron Kupers

  • Orbitofrontal cortex involvement in chronic analgesic-overuse headache evolving from episodic migraine.

    Arnaud Fumal;Steven Laureys;Laura Di Clemente;Mélanie Boly

  • Compensatory plasticity and cross-modal reorganization following early visual deprivation.

    Ron Kupers;Ron Kupers;Maurice Ptito;Maurice Ptito

  • Alterations of the visual pathways in congenital blindness.

    Maurice Ptito;Fabien C. G. Schneider;Olaf B. Paulson;Ron Kupers

  • Morphine differentially affects the sensory and affective pain ratings in neurogenic and idiopathic forms of pain

    Unknown

  • Neural correlates of virtual route recognition in congenital blindness

    Ron Kupers;Daniel R. Chebat;Kristoffer H. Madsen;Olaf B. Paulson

  • A PET activation study of brush-evoked allodynia in patients with nerve injury pain.

    Nanna Witting;Ron C. Kupers;Peter Svensson;Troels S. Jensen

  • Emotional valence modulates activity in the posterior fusiform gyrus and inferior medial prefrontal cortex in social perception

    Jacob Geday;Albert Gjedde;Anne Sophie Boldsen;Ron Kupers

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex induces somatotopically organized qualia in blind subjects

    Ron Kupers;Arnaud Fumal;Alain Maertens de Noordhout;Albert Gjedde

  • Positron emission tomography study of a chronic pain patient successfully treated with somatosensory thalamic stimulation

    Ron C. Kupers;Jan M. Gybels;Albert Gjedde

  • Beyond visual, aural and haptic movement perception: hMT+ is activated by electrotactile motion stimulation of the tongue in sighted and in congenitally blind individuals

    Isabelle Matteau;Ron Kupers;Emiliano Ricciardi;Pietro Pietrini

  • Quantitative rates of brain glucose metabolism distinguish minimally conscious from vegetative state patients

    Johan Stender;Ron Kupers;Anders Rodell;Aurore Thibaut

  • Stimulation of human thalamus for pain relief: possible modulatory circuits revealed by positron emission tomography.

    G H Duncan;R C Kupers;S Marchand;J G Villemure

  • Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals.

    Daniel-Robert Chebat;Fabien C. Schneider;Ron Kupers;Maurice Ptito

  • Experimental brush-evoked allodynia activates posterior parietal cortex.

    N. Witting;R. C. Kupers;Peter Svensson;Lars Arendt-Nielsen

  • Brain imaging of clinical pain states: a critical review and strategies for future studies

    Ron Kupers;Henrik Kehlet

  • Neuromodulation of pain. A consensus statement prepared in Brussels 16-18 January 1998 by the following task force of the European Federation of IASP Chapters (EFIC).

    J. Gybels;S Erdine;J Maeyaert;B Meyerson

  • The Nature of Consciousness in the Visually Deprived Brain

    Ron Kupers;Pietro Pietrini;Emiliano Ricciardi;Maurice Ptito;Maurice Ptito

  • The Minimal Energetic Requirement of Sustained Awareness after Brain Injury

    Johan Stender;Johan Stender;Kristian Nygaard N. Mortensen;Aurore Thibaut;Sune Darkner

  • Photochemically-induced ischemia of the rat sciatic nerve produces a dose-dependent and highly reproducible mechanical, heat and cold allodynia, and signs of spontaneous pain

    Ron Kupers;Wei Yu;Jonas K.E. Persson;Xiao-Jun Xu

  • The cognitive modulation of pain: hypnosis- and placebo-induced analgesia

    Ron Kupers;Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville;Steven Laureys

  • Analgesic and placebo effects of thalamic stimulation.

    Serge Marchand;Ron C Kupers;M.Catherine Bushnell;Gary H Duncan

Frequent Co-Authors

Maurice Ptito
Maurice Ptito University of Montreal
Albert Gjedde
Albert Gjedde University of Copenhagen
Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Olaf B. Paulson
Olaf B. Paulson University of Copenhagen
Pietro Pietrini
Pietro Pietrini IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Henrik Kehlet
Henrik Kehlet Copenhagen University Hospital
Emiliano Ricciardi
Emiliano Ricciardi IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Jean Schoenen
Jean Schoenen University of Liège
Léon Plaghki
Léon Plaghki Université Catholique de Louvain
Poul Jennum
Poul Jennum University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're inspired by neuroscience but want to explore related fields, several online degrees offer excellent career prospects. Many students are curious about how much is a psychology degree, as affordability and return on investment are important factors. Psychology degrees often serve as a foundational step toward careers in mental health, research, and counseling.

Those interested in social work can consider enrolling in an online master's in social work program. These programs prepare graduates for a broad range of supportive roles in communities and clinical settings. If counseling or therapy is your goal, an online lmft program is a targeted option for focusing on marriage and family therapy.

For students aiming to practice as clinical psychologists, exploring accredited psyd programs is essential. These professional doctorates combine rigorous coursework with supervised clinical experience, leading to advanced licensure and practice. Comparing these degrees can help you find the educational and career pathway that suits your passion for understanding the brain and supporting mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Ron Kupers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles