World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
5783
World Ranking
6845
National Ranking
132

Martin Schütz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Schütz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 99 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Martin Schütz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Schütz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Schütz is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a significant emphasis on ecology and related disciplines.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these fields, Schütz has contributed to several subfields such as:

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Soil Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Their research topics cover areas like:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Plant and Animal Studies
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Martin Schütz has published multiple papers in prominent scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Global Change Biology
  • Journal of Ecology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Ecology Letters
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Schütz comprise:

  • Spatial resolution, spectral metrics and biomass are key aspects in estimating plant species richness from spectral diversity in species-rich grasslands, 2021, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
  • Fertilized graminoids intensify negative drought effects on grassland productivity, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Nutrient availability controls the impact of mammalian herbivores on soil carbon and nitrogen pools in grasslands, 2020, Global Change Biology
  • Nutrient enrichment increases invertebrate herbivory and pathogen damage in grasslands, 2021, Journal of Ecology
  • Soil properties as key predictors of global grassland production: Have we overlooked micronutrients?, 2021, Ecology Letters

Schütz frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Anita C. Risch
  • Elizabeth T. Borer
  • Eric W. Seabloom
  • Risto Virtanen
  • Anu Eskelinen

Best Publications

  • Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe

    Jonathan W. Leff;Stuart E. Jones;Suzanne M. Prober;Albert Barberán

  • Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients

    Philip A. Fay;Suzanne M. Prober;W. Stanley Harpole;Johannes M. H. Knops

  • Range dynamics of mountain plants decrease with elevation.

    Sabine B. Rumpf;Karl Hülber;Günther Klonner;Dietmar Moser

  • Change in dominance determines herbivore effects on plant biodiversity

    Sally E. Koerner;Melinda D. Smith;Deron E. Burkepile;Niall P. Hanan

  • Soil net nitrogen mineralisation across global grasslands

    A.C. Risch;S. Zimmermann;R. Ochoa-Hueso;M. Schütz

  • General destabilizing effects of eutrophication on grassland productivity at multiple spatial scales

    Yann Hautier;Pengfei Zhang;Michel Loreau;Kevin R. Wilcox

  • Leaf nutrients, not specific leaf area, are consistent indicators of elevated nutrient inputs

    Jennifer Firn;James M. McGree;Eric Harvey;Habacuc Flores-Moreno

  • Impact of herbivory by red deer ( Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park

    Martin Schütz;Anita C Risch;Eliane Leuzinger;Bertil O Krüsi

  • Dominance reduction of species through disturbance—a proposed management principle for central European forests

    Thomas Wohlgemuth;Matthias Bürgi;Christoph Scheidegger;Martin Schütz

  • Importance of alternative food resources for browsing by roe deer on deciduous trees: The role of food availability and species quality

    Barbara Moser;Martin Schütz;Karin E. Hindenlang

  • The contribution of red wood ants to soil C and N pools and CO2 emissions in subalpine forests

    Anita C. Risch;Anita C. Risch;Martin F. Jurgensen;Martin Schütz;Deborah S. Page-Dumroese

  • How to predict plant functional types using imaging spectroscopy: linking vegetation community traits, plant functional types and spectral response

    Anna K. Schweiger;Martin Schütz;Anita C. Risch;Mathias Kneubühler

  • Spatial resolution, spectral metrics and biomass are key aspects in estimating plant species richness from spectral diversity in species-rich grasslands

    Christian Rossi;Christian Rossi;Christian Rossi;Mathias Kneubühler;Martin Schütz;Michael E. Schaepman

  • Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions

    A. C. Risch;R. Ochoa-Hueso;W. H. van der Putten;J. K. Bump;J. K. Bump

  • Fertilized graminoids intensify negative drought effects on grassland productivity

    Kevin Van Sundert;Mohammed A. S. Arfin Khan;Mohammed A. S. Arfin Khan;Siddharth Bharath;Yvonne M. Buckley

  • Evolutionary history of grazing and resources determine herbivore exclusion effects on plant diversity

    Unknown

  • Nutrient availability controls the impact of mammalian herbivores on soil carbon and nitrogen pools in grasslands

    Judith Sitters;E. R. Jasper Wubs;Elisabeth S. Bakker;Thomas W. Crowther

  • Nutrients cause grassland biomass to outpace herbivory.

    E. T. Borer;W. S. Harpole;W. S. Harpole;P. B. Adler;C. A. Arnillas

  • Long-term development of above- and below-ground carbon stocks following land-use change in subalpine ecosystems of the Swiss National Park

    Anita C. RischA.C. Risch;Anita C. RischA.C. Risch;Anita C. RischA.C. Risch;Martin F. JurgensenM.F. Jurgensen;Martin F. JurgensenM.F. Jurgensen;Martin F. JurgensenM.F. Jurgensen;Deborah S. Page-DumroeseD.S. Page-Dumroese;Deborah S. Page-DumroeseD.S. Page-Dumroese;Deborah S. Page-DumroeseD.S. Page-Dumroese;Otto WildiO. Wildi;Otto WildiO. Wildi;Otto WildiO. Wildi

  • Nutrient enrichment increases invertebrate herbivory and pathogen damage in grasslands

    Anne Ebeling;Alex T. Strauss;Alex T. Strauss;Peter B. Adler;Carlos A. Arnillas

  • Soil properties as key predictors of global grassland production: Have we overlooked micronutrients?

    Dajana Radujković;Erik Verbruggen;Eric W Seabloom;Michael Bahn

  • Phosphorus Translocation by Red Deer on a Subalpine Grassland in the Central European Alps

    Martin Schütz;Anita C. Risch;Anita C. Risch;Gérald Achermann;Conny Thiel-Egenter;Conny Thiel-Egenter

  • From local to regional: Functional diversity in differently managed alpine grasslands

    Christian Rossi;Christian Rossi;Christian Rossi;Mathias Kneubühler;Martin Schütz;Michael E. Schaepman

  • Reconstruction of a long-term recovery process from pasture to forest

    O. Wildi;M. Schütz

  • Herbivory and eutrophication mediate grassland plant nutrient responses across a global climatic gradient

    T. Michael Anderson;Daniel M. Griffith;James B. Grace;Eric M. Lind

Frequent Co-Authors

Anita C. Risch
Anita C. Risch Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Elizabeth T. Borer
Elizabeth T. Borer University of Minnesota
Eric W. Seabloom
Eric W. Seabloom University of Minnesota
Jennifer Firn
Jennifer Firn Queensland University of Technology
Joslin L. Moore
Joslin L. Moore Monash University
Carly J. Stevens
Carly J. Stevens Lancaster University
Anu Eskelinen
Anu Eskelinen University of Oulu
Peter B. Adler
Peter B. Adler Utah State University
Andrew S. MacDougall
Andrew S. MacDougall University of Guelph
Mahesh Sankaran
Mahesh Sankaran University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education is dramatically expanding opportunities for students interested in Ecology and Evolution. Today, a variety of non profit online universities offer quality, accredited programs. This flexibility allows learners to balance their studies with work or personal commitments.

Many students explore interdisciplinary routes, especially if transitioning from other fields. For example, fast-track healthcare options such as direct entry msn programs for non nurses online provide pathways for those seeking to blend biology or ecological studies with healthcare expertise.

Accreditation and program comparison are crucial when choosing the right online degree. For those considering healthcare-oriented careers, examining factors like capella university nursing accreditation can help ensure your chosen course meets industry standards.

Bridge programs, such as bsn to msn online programs, offer accelerated learning for professionals seeking advanced roles, often integrating environmental health and science topics. Exploring these diverse and flexible online pathways can open up unique careers across science and healthcare, both in and beyond ecology.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Schütz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles