World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wim Vandenberghe

Wim Vandenberghe

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
40268
World Ranking
4431
National Ranking
52

Wim Vandenberghe publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Vandenberghe sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 230 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Wim Vandenberghe D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Vandenberghe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus suppresses oscillatory beta activity in patients with Parkinson's disease in parallel with improvement in motor performance.

    Andrea A Kühn;Florian Kempf;Christof Brücke;Louise Gaynor Doyle

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Glycine receptor antibodies in PERM and related syndromes: characteristics, clinical features and outcomes.

    Carvajal-González A;Leite Mi;Waters P;Woodhall M

  • Paroxysmal exercise-induced dyskinesia and epilepsy is due to mutations in SLC2A1, encoding the glucose transporter GLUT1.

    Arvid Suls;Peter Dedeken;Karolien Goffin;Hilde Van Esch

  • Identification of genetic variants associated with Huntington's disease progression: a genome-wide association study

    Davina J Hensman Moss;Antonio F Pardiñas;Douglas Langbehn;Kitty Lo

  • The deubiquitinase USP15 antagonizes Parkin-mediated mitochondrial ubiquitination and mitophagy

    Tom Cornelissen;Dominik Haddad;Fieke Wauters;Cindy Van Humbeeck

  • Parkin interacts with Ambra1 to induce mitophagy

    Cindy Van Humbeeck;Tom Cornelissen;Hilde Hofkens;Wim Mandemakers

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors and selective vulnerability of motor neurons

    Ludo Van Den Bosch;Wim Vandenberghe;Hugo Klaassen;Elisabeth Van Houtte

  • Stargazin is an AMPA receptor auxiliary subunit

    Wim Vandenberghe;Roger A. Nicoll;David S. Bredt

  • AMPA Receptor Calcium Permeability, GluR2 Expression, and Selective Motoneuron Vulnerability

    Wim Vandenberghe;Wim Robberecht;James R. Brorson

  • Training dual tasks together or apart in Parkinson's disease: Results from the DUALITY trial

    Carolien Strouwen;Esther A. L. M. Molenaar;Liesbeth Münks;Samyra H. J. Keus

  • Interaction with the unfolded protein response reveals a role for stargazin in biosynthetic AMPA receptor transport.

    Wim Vandenberghe;Roger A. Nicoll;David S. Bredt

  • Motor imagery ability in patients with early- and mid-stage Parkinson disease.

    Elke Heremans;Peter Feys;Peter Feys;Alice Nieuwboer;Sarah Vercruysse

  • Beta burst coupling across the motor circuit in Parkinson's disease.

    Gerd Tinkhauser;Flavie Torrecillos;Yann Duclos;Huiling Tan

  • Effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a prospective controlled study

    Sarah Vercruysse;Wim Vandenberghe;Liesbeth Münks;Bart Nuttin

  • Predictors of fitness to drive in people with Parkinson disease

    H. Devos;W. Vandenberghe;A. Nieuwboer;M. Tant

  • The complexity of reproductive decision-making in asymptomatic carriers of the Huntington mutation

    Marleen Decruyenaere;Gerry Evers-Kiebooms;Andrea Boogaerts;Kristien Philippe

  • Widespread Decrease of Type 1 Cannabinoid Receptor Availability in Huntington Disease In Vivo

    Koen Van Laere;Cindy Casteels;Isabel Dhollander;Karolien Goffin

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart Nuttin
Bart Nuttin KU Leuven
Peter Brown
Peter Brown University of Oxford
Werner Helsen
Werner Helsen KU Leuven
Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman
Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman North-West University
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Andrea Ballabio
Andrea Ballabio Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Neuroscience can explore a range of related online programs to enhance their career options. For those drawn to social work, msw programs provide flexible learning pathways that cover mental health and behavioral sciences, making them a strong complement to neuroscience studies.

If you’re interested in applied behavior analysis, a bcba degree online can prepare you for credentials in behavior therapy and intervention, fields that often intersect with neuroscience principles. Many programs offer affordability, broadening access to aspiring specialists.

Accelerated degrees can help you enter the workforce faster. accelerated msw programs are ideal for students looking to quickly gain advanced skills in social work. Similarly, an accelerated psychology degree online offers a fast track to careers in clinical research, counseling, and neuropsychology, all closely aligned with neuroscience.

By considering these online degrees, neuroscience students can expand their career prospects in healthcare, mental health, and research—while benefiting from the flexibility and affordability of distance learning.

Best Scientists Citing Wim Vandenberghe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles