World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cidália M.S. Botelho

Cidália M.S. Botelho

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 7058 6783 39 39 112 7821

Cidália M.S. Botelho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cidália M.S. Botelho between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cidália M.S. Botelho published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2012. 14 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2012. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 8 publications
1994 2025

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cidália M.S. Botelho: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 6
2008 10
2009 3
2010 2
2011 5
2012 16
2013 6
2014 6
2015 9
2016 3
2017 4
2018 3
2019 5
2020 5
2021 4
2022 8
2023 2
2024 6
2025 8
Total 125
Download as CSV

Cidália M.S. Botelho publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cidália M.S. Botelho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 112 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 112
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Cidália M.S. Botelho D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cidália M.S. Botelho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Cidália M.S. Botelho is affiliated with the University of Porto in Portugal and has a research focus within Environmental Science, with a significant number of publications concentrated in this field. Their work addresses various subfields including Water Science and Technology, Environmental Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution, and Aquatic Science.

The research topics covered by Cidália M.S. Botelho encompass areas related to environmental contamination and remediation. Key topics include:

  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Iron oxide chemistry and applications
  • Mine drainage and remediation techniques

The scientist's publication record includes articles in journals such as Water, Chemosphere, Journal of Hazardous Materials, The Science of The Total Environment, and Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. Notably, the most frequent venues for Cidália's work include:

  • Water
  • Chemosphere
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

Recent research papers authored or co-authored by Cidália M.S. Botelho span from 2020 to 2023 and cover topics such as phenolic compound extraction, biorefinery of marine macroalgae, arsenic removal technologies, tannin-based coagulants, and arsenic adsorption in continuous systems. Selected recent papers include:

  • Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from chestnut processing waste using response surface methodology, 2023, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Biorefinery of marine macroalgae into high-tech bioproducts: a review, 2020, Environmental Chemistry Letters
  • Efficient removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by continuous adsorption onto iron-coated cork granulates, 2022, Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Tannin-based coagulants: Current development and prospects on synthesis and uses, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Current Trends of Arsenic Adsorption in Continuous Mode: Literature Review and Future Perspectives, 2021, Sustainability

Cidália M.S. Botelho frequently collaborates with several researchers in the field. Key co-authors include:

  • Rui A.R. Boaventura
  • Isabella T. Tomasi
  • Ariana M.A. Pintor
  • Sílvia C.R. Santos
  • Mariko A. Carneiro

Best Publications

  • Arsenic and antimony in water and wastewater: overview of removal techniques with special reference to latest advances in adsorption

    Gabriela Ungureanu;Sílvia C. R. Santos;Rui Boaventura;Cidália Botelho

  • Performance and prospects of different adsorbents for phosphorus uptake and recovery from water

    Hugo Bacelo;Ariana M.A. Pintor;Sílvia C.R. Santos;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Selenium contaminated waters: An overview of analytical methods, treatment options and recent advances in sorption methods.

    Sílvia Santos;Gabriela Ungureanu;Rui Boaventura;Cidália Botelho

  • Oil and grease removal from wastewaters: Sorption treatment as an alternative to state-of-the-art technologies. A critical review

    Ariana M.A. Pintor;Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • A review of the use of red mud as adsorbent for the removal of toxic pollutants from water and wastewater

    Amit Bhatnagar;Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Methylene blue adsorption by algal biomass based materials: biosorbents characterization and process behaviour.

    Vítor J P Vilar;Cidália M S Botelho;Rui A R Boaventura

  • Tannin-based biosorbents for environmental applications - A review

    Hugo A.M. Bacelo;Sílvia C.R. Santos;Cidália M.S. Botelho

  • Coconut-based biosorbents for water treatment — A review of the recent literature

    Amit Bhatnagar;Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Influence of pH, ionic strength and temperature on lead biosorption by Gelidium and agar extraction algal waste

    Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Optimization of coagulation-flocculation and flotation parameters for the treatment of a petroleum refinery effluent from a Portuguese Plant

    Carlos E. Santo;Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Amit Bhatnagar

  • Equilibrium and kinetic modelling of Cd(II) biosorption by algae Gelidium and agar extraction algal waste.

    Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Use of cork powder and granules for the adsorption of pollutants: a review.

    Ariana M.A. Pintor;Catarina I.A. Ferreira;Joana C. Pereira;Patrícia Correia

  • Copper removal by algae Gelidium, agar extraction algal waste and granulated algal waste: kinetics and equilibrium.

    Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Arsenic removal from water using iron-coated seaweeds.

    Bárbara R.C. Vieira;Ariana M.A. Pintor;Rui A.R. Boaventura;Cidália M.S. Botelho

  • Fish canning industry wastewater treatment for water reuse – a case study

    Raquel O. Cristóvão;Cidália M. Botelho;Ramiro J.E. Martins;José M. Loureiro

  • Efficient removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by continuous adsorption onto iron-coated cork granulates.

    Unknown

  • Arsenate and arsenite adsorption onto iron-coated cork granulates

    Ariana M.A. Pintor;Bárbara R.C. Vieira;Sílvia C.R. Santos;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Surface Water Quality Assessment of Lis River Using Multivariate Statistical Methods

    Judite S. Vieira;Judite S. Vieira;José C. M. Pires;Fernando G. Martins;Vítor J. P. Vilar

  • Chromium and zinc uptake by algae Gelidium and agar extraction algal waste: Kinetics and equilibrium

    Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Copper desorption from Gelidium algal biomass.

    Vítor J.P. Vilar;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Continuous biosorption of Pb/Cu and Pb/Cd in fixed-bed column using algae Gelidium and granulated agar extraction algal waste

    Vítor J.P. Vilar;José M. Loureiro;Cidália M.S. Botelho;Rui A.R. Boaventura

  • Bioadsorptive removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by the biorefinery waste of Fucus spiralis.

    Catalina Filote;Irina Volf;Sílvia C.R. Santos;Cidália M.S. Botelho

Frequent Co-Authors

Rui A.R. Boaventura
Rui A.R. Boaventura University of Porto
Vítor J.P. Vilar
Vítor J.P. Vilar University of Porto
Amit Bhatnagar
Amit Bhatnagar Lappeenranta University of Technology
José M. Loureiro
José M. Loureiro University of Porto
Arminda Alves
Arminda Alves University of Porto
Francisco Rodríguez-Reinoso
Francisco Rodríguez-Reinoso University of Alicante
Alírio E. Rodrigues
Alírio E. Rodrigues University of Porto
Laura Sigg
Laura Sigg ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which intersect with related fields. For instance, mastering spatial analysis through Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is crucial for environmental planning and resource management. Students interested in advanced specialization can explore the top GIS masters programs to enhance their technical expertise.

Public administration also plays a significant role in environmental policy development. Professionals aiming for leadership roles might consider online options, such as the top online MPA programs, which provide valuable skills in managing government and nonprofit agencies involved in sustainability initiatives.

Understanding human behavior and societal trends is integral to effectively addressing environmental challenges. Pursuing a degree in sociology can provide this perspective. Check out the best online sociology bachelor degree options that complement environmental studies by examining community impact and social dynamics.

For educators and professionals seeking to influence environmental education, advanced degrees like the Doctor of Education are valuable. Programs that offer flexibility, such as the online EdD no dissertation options, enable learners to advance their careers without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Best Scientists Citing Cidália M.S. Botelho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles