World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3945 3637 257 237 137 26722

E. David Klonsky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. David Klonsky between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. David Klonsky published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 10 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 3 publications
2000 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. David Klonsky: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 0
2002 3
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 5
2008 5
2009 9
2010 5
2011 6
2012 5
2013 6
2014 13
2015 11
2016 11
2017 5
2018 5
2019 8
2020 9
2021 16
2022 6
2023 4
2024 7
2025 3
Total 148
Download as CSV

E. David Klonsky publications per year - data summary

  • E. David Klonsky, a Psychology scholar from University of British Columbia, has 148 publications recorded across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 26 years in the span carries no publications at all (2001).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.9 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 36 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2008: 19 publications (2.1 per year); 2009-2017: 71 publications (7.9 per year); 2018-2025: 58 publications (7.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

E. David Klonsky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. David Klonsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

E. David Klonsky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • E. David Klonsky, a Psychology scholar from University of British Columbia, records 137 publications - the 42nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 42% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than E. David Klonsky, and about 58% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and E. David Klonsky ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

E. David Klonsky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. David Klonsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

E. David Klonsky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • E. David Klonsky, a Psychology scholar from University of British Columbia, records 57 D-Index - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than E. David Klonsky, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and E. David Klonsky ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

E. David Klonsky is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with significant contributions to clinical psychology, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, sociology and political science, and cognitive neuroscience. The body of work spans 64 publications in psychology and its related subfields.

The main topics of Klonsky's research include:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Insect and Pesticide Research

Klonsky's frequent publication venues include:

  • Assessment
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Behavior Therapy

Their recent notable papers are:

  • The three-step theory of suicide: Description, evidence, and some useful points of clarification (2021) - Preventive Medicine
  • The critical distinction between suicidal ideation and suicide attempts (2021) - World Psychiatry
  • Motivations for suicide: Converging evidence from clinical and community samples (2020) - Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Inflexible Interpretations of Ambiguous Social Situations: A Novel Predictor of Suicidal Ideation and the Beliefs That Inspire It (2021) - Clinical Psychological Science
  • Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Functions as Pathways to Future Self-Harm Repetition and Suicide Attempts (2021) - Frontiers in Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Klonsky include:

  • Mikayla C. Pachkowski
  • Lauren M. O'Reilly
  • Erik Pettersson
  • Patrick D. Quinn
  • Sebastian Lundström

Best Publications

  • The functions of deliberate self-injury: a review of the evidence.

    E. David Klonsky

  • The Three-Step Theory (3ST): A New Theory of Suicide Rooted in the "Ideation-to-Action" Framework

    E. David Klonsky;Alexis M. May

  • Suicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation

    E. David Klonsky;Alexis M. May;Boaz Y. Saffer

  • Deliberate Self-Harm in a Nonclinical Population: Prevalence and Psychological Correlates

    E. David Klonsky;Thomas F. Oltmanns;Eric Turkheimer

  • Assessing the Functions of Non-suicidal Self-injury: Psychometric Properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS)

    E. David Klonsky;Catherine R. Glenn

  • Self-injury: a research review for the practitioner.

    E. David Klonsky;Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp

  • Identifying clinically distinct subgroups of self-injurers among young adults: a latent class analysis.

    E. David Klonsky;Thomas M. Olino

  • The relationship between nonsuicidal self-injury and attempted suicide: converging evidence from four samples.

    E. David Klonsky;Alexis M. May;Catherine Rose Glenn

  • Differentiating suicide attempters from suicide ideators: a critical frontier for suicidology research.

    E. David Klonsky;Alexis M. May

  • The functions of self-injury in young adults who cut themselves: clarifying the evidence for affect regulation

    E. David Klonsky

  • Non-suicidal self-injury in United States adults: prevalence, sociodemographics, topography and functions

    Unknown

  • Ideation-to-action theories of suicide: a conceptual and empirical update.

    E. David Klonsky;Boaz Y. Saffer;Craig J. Bryan

  • Measurement of emotion dysregulation in adolescents

    Anna Weinberg;E. David Klonsky

  • Childhood sexual abuse and non-suicidal self-injury: meta-analysis

    E. David Klonsky;Anne Moyer

  • What distinguishes suicide attempters from suicide ideators? A meta‐analysis of potential factors.

    Alexis M. May;E. David Klonsky

  • Predictors of future suicide attempt among adolescents with suicidal thoughts or non-suicidal self-harm: a population-based birth cohort study

    Becky Mars;Becky Mars;Jon Heron;E David Klonsky;Paul Moran;Paul Moran

  • Nonsuicidal self-injury: what we know, and what we need to know.

    E David Klonsky;Sarah E Victor;Boaz Y Saffer

  • Emotion dysregulation as a core feature of borderline personality disorder

    Catherine R. Glenn;E. David Klonsky

  • Correlates of suicide attempts among self-injurers: a meta-analysis.

    Sarah E. Victor;E. David Klonsky

  • Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-18) in Five Samples

    Sarah E. Victor;E. David Klonsky

  • Informant-Reports of Personality Disorder: Relation to Self-Reports and Future Research Directions

    E. David Klonsky;Thomas F. Oltmanns

  • Self-Injury:AResearchReviewforthePractitioner

    E. David Klonsky;Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine R. Glenn
Catherine R. Glenn Old Dominion University
Anna Weinberg
Anna Weinberg McGill University
Thomas F. Oltmanns
Thomas F. Oltmanns Washington University in St. Louis
Greg Hajcak
Greg Hajcak Santa Clara University
Henrik Larsson
Henrik Larsson Karolinska Institute
Brian M. D’Onofrio
Brian M. D’Onofrio Indiana University
Paul Moran
Paul Moran University of Bristol
Eric Turkheimer
Eric Turkheimer University of Virginia
David Gunnell
David Gunnell University of Bristol
Craig J. Bryan
Craig J. Bryan The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of rewarding online degree options and professional pathways. Many students pursuing psychology also consider expanding their expertise with degrees in related fields such as social work. Online social work programs, in particular, offer flexibility for working professionals and those with family commitments.

When evaluating online degrees, it’s important to look at the value provided by different programs. Many universities across the country offer affordable options without sacrificing quality. For example, the most valuable online social work degrees in Connecticut can help students thrive in both psychology and social services roles. Likewise, those residing in or near Iowa may find the best value online social work degrees in Dubuque an appealing choice.

The best value online social work programs in Indiana and the most valuable online social work degrees in Kansas also offer excellent opportunities for those looking to bridge psychology education with a career in social work. These programs can lead to impactful roles in counseling, community services, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing E. David Klonsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles