World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margaret E. Beier

Margaret E. Beier

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10374 9711 5443 4970 115 7618

Margaret E. Beier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Margaret E. Beier between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Margaret E. Beier published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2020. 10 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2020. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 7 publications
2000 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Margaret E. Beier: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 4
2002 4
2003 4
2004 2
2005 5
2006 5
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 7
2011 8
2012 10
2013 4
2014 3
2015 5
2016 3
2017 4
2018 9
2019 9
2020 15
2021 4
2022 8
2023 5
2024 3
2025 7
Total 142
Download as CSV

Margaret E. Beier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret E. Beier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 115
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Margaret E. Beier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret E. Beier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Margaret E. Beier is affiliated with Rice University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research spans a broad range of topics with particular emphasis on aging, career development, and workplace dynamics.

Beier's recent publications include several papers that address various aspects of workplace aging, career transitions, and team performance. Notable works are:

  • A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness, 2021, CBE-Life Sciences Education
  • What's age got to do with it? A primer and review of the workplace aging literature, 2022, Personnel Psychology
  • The college-to-career transition in STEM: An eleven-year longitudinal study of perceived and objective vocational interest fit, 2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • How Approaches to Animal Swarm Intelligence Can Improve the Study of Collective Intelligence in Human Teams, 2020, Journal of Intelligence
  • Life-Span Learning and Development and Its Implications for Workplace Training, 2021, Current Directions in Psychological Science

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, Beier focuses on subfields such as:

  • Demography
  • General Health Professions
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Safety Research

The core topics covered in their work encompass:

  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Psychological and Educational Research Studies

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Meghan K. Davenport
  • Brittany Bradford
  • Ashutosh Sabharwal
  • Anne Casper
  • Mona Cockerham

Development of their work is also reflected in repeated contributions to specific publication venues such as:

  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings
  • Personnel Psychology
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Best Publications

  • Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs?

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Margaret E. Beier;Mary O. Boyle

  • Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Margaret E. Beier;Mary D. Boyle

  • Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: a theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation.

    Jason G. Randall;Frederick L. Oswald;Margaret E. Beier

  • Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge : Promising results in a real-world learning environment

    Margaret E. Beier;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge

    Phillip L Ackerman;Margaret E Beier;Kristy R Bowen

  • Determinants of Individual Differences and Gender Differences in Knowledge.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Kristy R. Bowen;Margaret E. Beier;Ruth Kanfer

  • The effect of authentic project‐based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM

    Margaret E. Beier;Michelle H. Kim;Ann Saterbak;Veronica Leautaud

  • Determinants of health knowledge: an investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests.

    Margaret E. Beier;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Goals and motivation related to work in later adulthood: An organizing framework

    Ruth Kanfer;Margaret E. Beier;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Executive Function in Older Adults : A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

    Rachel Hull;Randi C. Martin;Margaret E. Beier;David Lane

  • Learning and motivational impacts of a multimedia science game

    Leslie M. Miller;Ching-I. Chang;Shu Wang;Margaret E. Beier

  • Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Ruth Kanfer;Margaret E. Beier

  • Current-events knowledge in adults: an investigation of age, intelligence, and nonability determinants.

    Margaret E. Beier;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Intelligence, Personality, and Interests in the Career Choice Process.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Margaret E. Beier

  • Differentiating specific job knowledge from implicit trait policies in procedural knowledge measured by a situational judgment test.

    Stephan J. Motowidlo;Margaret E. Beier

  • Motivation in Training and Development: A Phase Perspective

    Margaret E. Beier;Ruth Kanfer

  • Determinants of domain knowledge and independent study learning in an adult sample.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Margaret E. Beier

  • Overview: Self-Efficacy in STEM

    Ashley D. Rittmayer;Margaret E. Beier

  • Active aging at work: Contributing factors and implications for organizations

    Hannes Zacher;Hannes Zacher;Dorien T.A.M. Kooij;Dorien T.A.M. Kooij;Margaret E. Beier

  • Measuring Relationships between Personality, Knowledge, and Performance using Single-response Situational Judgment Tests

    Amy E. Crook;Margaret E. Beier;Cody B. Cox;Harrison J. Kell

  • Explorations of crystallized intelligence: Completion tests, cloze tests, and knowledge

    Phillip L Ackerman;Margaret E Beier;Kristy R Bowen

Frequent Co-Authors

Phillip L. Ackerman
Phillip L. Ackerman Georgia Institute of Technology
Ruth Kanfer
Ruth Kanfer Georgia Institute of Technology
Stephan J. Motowidlo
Stephan J. Motowidlo Rice University
Frederick L. Oswald
Frederick L. Oswald Rice University
Eduardo Salas
Eduardo Salas Rice University
Hannes Zacher
Hannes Zacher Leipzig University
Randi C. Martin
Randi C. Martin Rice University
Ashutosh Sabharwal
Ashutosh Sabharwal Rice University
Gwenith G. Fisher
Gwenith G. Fisher Colorado State University
David M. Lane
David M. Lane Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up a diverse range of online degrees and professional pathways. One increasingly popular option is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which can lead to roles in autism services, education, and mental health support. Online programs provide the flexibility needed for working students and those seeking specialized credentials.

Each state has specific requirements for BCBA certification. For example, if you're interested in Texas, review the Dallas bcba education requirements to understand the necessary coursework and supervised experience. If you're looking at Colorado, be sure to check out the bcba certification requirements in Denver for region-specific information.

Students in Michigan can consult the bcba certification requirements in Detroit. For those located in North Carolina, the bcba certification requirements in Durham are essential for understanding pathways in that region.

Exploring these online degree and certification routes not only expands your career options but also enables you to make a meaningful impact in various psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret E. Beier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles