World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
30159
World Ranking
2323
National Ranking
1351

Phillip L. Ackerman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip L. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 173 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Phillip L. Ackerman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip L. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Phillip L. Ackerman is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Demography, and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology.

Key topics addressed in their work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness; Cognitive Abilities and Testing; Retirement, Disability, and Employment; Aging and Gerontology Research; Labor market dynamics and wage inequality; Cognitive Science and Mapping; and Educational and Psychological Assessments.

Phillip L. Ackerman has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in these venues:

  • American Psychologist
  • Intelligence
  • Journal of Intelligence
  • Psychological Bulletin
  • Educational Psychology Review

Recent papers authored by Ackerman include:

  • Work in the 21st century: New directions for aging and adult development (2020, American Psychologist)
  • A primer on assessing intelligence in laboratory studies (2020, Intelligence)
  • Intelligence... moving beyond the lowest common denominator (2022, American Psychologist)
  • Intelligence Process vs. Content and Academic Performance: A Trip through a House of Mirrors (2022, Journal of Intelligence)

Frequent collaborators in their research include Corey E. Tatel, Ruth Kanfer, Zachary R. Tidler, Sarah McColm, and Victoria Graham.

Best Publications

  • Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition

    Ruth Kanfer;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Eric D. Heggestad

  • Aging, Adult Development, and Work Motivation

    Ruth Kanfer;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes.

    Viswanath Venkatesh;Michael G. Morris;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing.

    Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs?

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Margaret E. Beier;Mary O. Boyle

  • A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge

    Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives.

    Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior

    M.G. Morris;V. Venkatesh;P.L. Ackerman

  • Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement.

    Maynard Goff;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: dynamics of ability determinants.

    Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Margaret E. Beier;Mary D. Boyle

  • Cognitive and noncognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Ruth Kanfer;Maynard Goff

  • Goal setting, conditions of practice, and task performance: A resource allocation perspective.

    Ruth Kanfer;Phillip L. Ackerman;Todd C. Murtha;Brad Dugdale

  • Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge : Promising results in a real-world learning environment

    Margaret E. Beier;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition.

    Phillip L. Ackerman;Anna T. Cianciolo

  • Investment and intellect: A review and meta-analysis

    Sophie von Stumm;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Individual Differences in Work Motivation: Further Explorations of a Trait Framework

    Ruth Kanfer;Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Domain-Specific Knowledge as the "Dark Matter" of Adult Intelligence Gf/Gc, Personality and Interest Correlates

    Phillip L. Ackerman

  • Assessing individual differences in knowledge: Knowledge, intelligence, and related traits.

    Eric L. Rolfhus;Phillip L. Ackerman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth Kanfer
Ruth Kanfer Georgia Institute of Technology
Margaret E. Beier
Margaret E. Beier Rice University
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic University College London
Adrian Furnham
Adrian Furnham BI Norwegian Business School
Viswanath Venkatesh
Viswanath Venkatesh Virginia Tech
Sophie von Stumm
Sophie von Stumm University of York
Manuel C. Voelkle
Manuel C. Voelkle Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg Cornell University
Michael S. Humphreys
Michael S. Humphreys University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA offers flexible career pathways, whether you’re just starting or looking to specialize. For those interested in initial foundational knowledge, pursuing an associate degree in psychology can be an accessible first step, offering entry-level skills for workplace or further study.

If you’re seeking a faster route to advanced knowledge, consider a 1-year psychology masters online. These programs are designed for motivated professionals aiming to deepen expertise or shift career focus in a short time frame.

For those drawn to working with children and learning environments, nasp approved school psychology programs online are ideal. These programs meet strict national standards and prepare graduates for licensure and school-based roles.

Interested in supporting behavioral change? The best online applied behavior analysis programs focus on practical strategies for behavior intervention in various settings, from schools to healthcare. No matter your career goals, diverse online psychology programs can help you achieve your aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Phillip L. Ackerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles