World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
21861
World Ranking
4849
National Ranking
1781

James J. Hack publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. Hack sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 91 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

James J. Hack D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. Hack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

James J. Hack is affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States. Their recent research contributions have been published primarily in the journal Computing in Science & Engineering, where they have authored several papers. Notably, Hack contributed to the 2020 publication titled The U.S. High-Performance Computing Consortium in the Fight Against COVID-19, which addresses computational efforts aimed at combating the COVID-19 pandemic.

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authorship with a number of colleagues in computational science, including Robert L. Voigt (with whom they co-authored two papers), Michael E. Papka, David L. Brown, Jaydeep P. Bardhan, and Mary Ann Leung.

Their publication record, concentrated in Computing in Science & Engineering, reflects involvement in topics related to high-performance computing and computational science. Recent papers co-published in the same venue also include works led by David L. Brown and Jaydeep P. Bardhan, indicating interconnected research efforts within these networks.

  • The U.S. High-Performance Computing Consortium in the Fight Against COVID-19 (2020, Computing in Science & Engineering)
  • The Early Years and Evolution of the DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellowship Program (2021, Computing in Science & Engineering)
  • Table of Contents (2021, Computing in Science & Engineering)

Hack's collaborations and publication venues indicate a focus on computational infrastructure and educational programs in computational science. Their work provides insights into both the application of advanced computing resources during emergency response scenarios and the development of fellowship programs supporting computational science education.

Best Publications

  • The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research

    James W. Hurrell;M. M. Holland;P. R. Gent;S. Ghan

  • The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3)

    William D. Collins;Cecilia M. Bitz;Maurice L. Blackmon;Gordon B. Bonan

  • The National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: CCM3*

    J. T. Kiehl;J. J. Hack;G. B. Bonan;B. A. Boville

  • Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3)

    T. Kiehl;J. Hack;B. Bonan;A. Boville

  • A standard test set for numerical approximations to the shallow water equations in spherical geometry

    David L. Williamson;John B. Drake;James J. Hack;Rüdiger Jakob

  • A New Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Boundary Dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model

    James W. Hurrell;James J. Hack;Dennis Shea;Julie M. Caron

  • The Formulation and Atmospheric Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3)

    William D. Collins;Philip J. Rasch;Byron A. Boville;James J. Hack

  • Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2)

    James J. Hack

  • Intraseasonal oscillations in 15 atmospheric general circulation models: results from an AMIP diagnostic subproject

    J. M. Slingo;K. R. Sperber;J. S. Boyle;J.-P. Ceron

  • Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: observations versus models.

    R. D. Cess;M. H. Zhang;P. Minnis;L. Corsetti

  • Inertial Stability and Tropical Cyclone Development

    Wayne H. Schubert;James J. Hack

  • Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements

    M. H. Zhang;W. Y. Lin;S. A. Klein;S. A. Klein;J. T. Bacmeister

  • Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update

    R. D. Cess;M. H. Zhang;W. J. Ingram;G. L. Potter

  • Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM2)

    J. Hack;A. Boville;P. Briegleb;T. Kiehl

  • The Low-Resolution CCSM3

    Stephen G. Yeager;Christine A. Shields;William G. Large;James J. Hack

  • Nonlinear Response of Atmospheric Vortices to Heating by Organized Cumulus Convection

    James J. Hack;Wayne H. Schubert

  • The Community Climate System Model: CCSM3

    W D Collins;M Blackmon;C Bitz;G Bonan

  • The Community Climate System Model

    Maurice Blackmon;Byron Boville;Frank Bryan;Robert Dickinson

  • A modified formulation of fractional stratiform condensation rate in the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model (CAM2)

    Minghua Zhang;Wuyin Lin;Christopher S. Bretherton;James J. Hack

  • The simulated Earth radiation budget of the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model CCM2 and comparisons with the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE)

    J. T. Kiehl;J. J. Hack;B. P. Briegleb

  • Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM1)

    L. Williamson;T. Kiehl;Veerabhadran Ramanathan;E. Dickinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey T. Kiehl
Jeffrey T. Kiehl University of California, Santa Cruz
Minghua Zhang
Minghua Zhang Stony Brook University
Wayne H. Schubert
Wayne H. Schubert Colorado State University
David L. Williamson
David L. Williamson National Center for Atmospheric Research
Byron A. Boville
Byron A. Boville National Center for Atmospheric Research
William D. Collins
William D. Collins Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Cecilia M. Bitz
Cecilia M. Bitz University of Washington
Philip J. Rasch
Philip J. Rasch Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
James W. Hurrell
James W. Hurrell Colorado State University
Christopher S. Bretherton
Christopher S. Bretherton University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students seek guidance on what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get, particularly when balancing studies with other commitments. While ease varies by individual preference, programs connected to environmental fields often combine practical skills with accessible coursework.

Specialized degrees like online geology degrees provide a solid foundation in earth sciences, essential for careers in natural resource management and environmental consulting. Similarly, programs in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are increasingly important for analyzing environmental data. The best GIS programs in the US offer training in spatial analysis, a growing field within environmental research and policy.

For graduates aiming to influence environmental regulation and public policy, pursuing a Master of Public Administration can be highly beneficial. Many students prefer accelerated paths, and the best online MPA options enable professionals to enhance leadership skills without leaving their careers.

By considering these related programs, students can tailor their education to match their interests and career goals while staying aware of program demands and industry trends.

Best Scientists Citing James J. Hack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles