World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
11615
World Ranking
4344
National Ranking
1969

M. Christian Brown publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Christian Brown sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 135 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

M. Christian Brown D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Christian Brown sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Christian Brown is affiliated with the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a strong focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Biomedical Engineering.

The core topics of Brown's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, and Genetics. Additional areas of focus cover Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, and Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research.

Brown has published research articles in various scientific journals. Some recent papers include:

  • Magnetic stimulation allows focal activation of the mouse cochlea, 2022, eLife
  • Human Cochlear Nucleus on 7 Tesla Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Insights Into Micro-anatomy and Function for Auditory Brainstem Implant Surgery, 2020, Otology & Neurotology
  • Clinical and scientific innovations in auditory brainstem implants, 2021, World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  • Adult Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes and Three-Dimensional Electrode Array Position on Computed Tomography, 2021, Ear and Hearing
  • Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes in Tumor and Nontumor Patients: A Systematic Review, 2024, Otolaryngology

Frequent collaborators in Brown's work include:

  • Daniel J. Lee
  • Stephen McInturff
  • Vivek V. Kanumuri
  • Florent-Valéry Coen
  • Stéphanie P. Lacour

Brown's research has appeared repeatedly in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, the Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Otolaryngology, eLife, and the World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. These venues reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their work across auditory neuroscience and medical research.

Best Publications

  • The macrophage response to central and peripheral nerve injury. A possible role for macrophages in regeneration.

    V H Perry;M C Brown;S Gordon

  • Absence of Wallerian Degeneration does not Hinder Regeneration in Peripheral Nerve.

    E. R. Lunn;V. H. Perry;M. C. Brown;H. Rosen

  • Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat.

    M.C. Liberman;M.C. Liberman;M.C. Brown;M.C. Brown

  • Motor nerve sprouting.

    Unknown

  • The relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors of the cat

    Unknown

  • Role of α9 Nicotinic ACh Receptor Subunits in the Development and Function of Cochlear Efferent Innervation

    Douglas E Vetter;M.Charles Liberman;Jeffrey Mann;Jacques Barhanin

  • Full spectrum of malformations in velo-cardio-facial syndrome/DiGeorge syndrome mouse models by altering Tbx1 dosage

    Jun Liao;Lazaros Kochilas;Sonja Nowotschin;Jelena S. Arnold

  • Vascular Defects and Sensorineural Deafness in a Mouse Model of Norrie Disease

    Heidi L. Rehm;Duan-Sun Zhang;Duan-Sun Zhang;M. Christian Brown;M. Christian Brown;Barbara Burgess

  • Very Slow Retrograde and Wallerian Degeneration in the CNS of C57BL/Ola Mice.

    V. H. Perry;M. C. Brown;E. R. Lunn

  • Radiation-induced reductions in macrophage recruitment have only slight effects on myelin degeneration in sectioned peripheral nerves of mice.

    V H Perry;J W Tsao;S Fearn;M C Brown

  • Role of macrophages in peripheral nerve degeneration and repair

    Unknown

  • Unique Postsynaptic Signaling at the Hair Cell Efferent Synapse Permits Calcium to Evoke Changes on Two Time Scales

    Unknown

  • Intracellular recordings from cochlear inner hair cells: effects of stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear efferents.

    MC Brown;AL Nuttall;RI Masta

  • A gene affecting Wallerian nerve degeneration maps distally on mouse chromosome 4

    M F Lyon;B W Ogunkolade;M C Brown;D J Atherton

  • Essential role of retinoblastoma protein in mammalian hair cell development and hearing.

    Cyrille Sage;Mingqian Huang;Melissa A. Vollrath;M. Christian Brown

  • Projections of thin (type-II) and thick (type-I) auditory-nerve fibers into the cochlear nucleus of the mouse.

    M.Christian Brown;M.Christian Brown;John V Ledwith

  • Consequences of slow Wallerian degeneration for regenerating motor and sensory axons.

    Unknown

  • A central role for denervated tissues in causing nerve sprouting

    Unknown

  • Tissue-specific roles of Tbx1 in the development of the outer, middle and inner ear, defective in 22q11DS patients

    Jelena S. Arnold;Evan M. Braunstein;Takahiro Ohyama;Andrew K. Groves

  • Further Studies on Motor and Sensory Nerve Regeneration in Mice With Delayed Wallerian Degeneration

    Unknown

  • The pattern of axonal degeneration in the peripheral nervous system varies with different types of lesion

    E.R. Lunn;M.C. Brown;V.H. Perry

  • The temperature dependency of neural and hair cell responses evoked by high frequencies

    M. Christian Brown;D. Ian Smith;Alfred L. Nuttall

  • Mice overexpressing genes from the 22q11 region deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome/DiGeorge syndrome have middle and inner ear defects

    Birgit Funke;Jonathan A. Epstein;Lazaros K. Kochilas;Min Min Lu

  • The Rate of Wallerian Degeneration in Cultured Neurons from Wild Type and C57BL/WldS Mice Depends on Time in Culture and may be Extended in the Presence of Elevated K+ Levels

    E. A. Buckmaster;V. H. Perry;M. C. Brown

  • Inner hair cell responses to the velocity of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig.

    Alfred L. Nuttall;M. Christian Brown;Robert I. Masta;Merle Lawrence

  • Responses of medial olivocochlear neurons. Specifying the central pathways of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

    M. C. Brown;M. C. Brown;R. K. de Venecia;R. K. de Venecia;J. J. Guinan;J. J. Guinan

  • Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Interneurons Are Located in the Posteroventral Cochlear Nucleus: A Kainic Acid Lesion Study in Guinea Pigs

    Ronald K. De Venecia;M. Charles Liberman;John J. Guinan;M. Christian Brown

  • Auditory Brainstem Implants: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives

    Kevin Wong;Elliott D. Kozin;Elliott D. Kozin;Vivek V. Kanumuri;Vivek V. Kanumuri;Nicolas Vachicouras

  • Superior temporal resolution of Chronos versus channelrhodopsin-2 in an optogenetic model of the auditory brainstem implant.

    Ariel Edward Hight;Elliott D. Kozin;Keith Darrow;Ashton Lehmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Stéphanie P. Lacour
Stéphanie P. Lacour École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
M. Charles Liberman
M. Charles Liberman Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Albert S.B. Edge
Albert S.B. Edge Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
John J. Guinan
John J. Guinan Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Joe C. Adams
Joe C. Adams Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
David P. Corey
David P. Corey Harvard University
Bernice E. Morrow
Bernice E. Morrow Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Cynthia C. Morton
Cynthia C. Morton Brigham and Women's Hospital
Daniel B. Polley
Daniel B. Polley Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to diverse careers, from research and healthcare to technology and data analysis. If you’re planning your academic path, understanding which degrees make the most money can help you align your neuroscience studies with high-paying, in-demand fields such as biomedical engineering, data science, and pharmaceutical research.

For those seeking flexibility and affordability, many cheap online colleges that accept fafsa offer accredited neuroscience and related science programs, making online study more accessible.

Pairing your degree with in-demand credentials can also give you an edge. Look into what certifications can i get online to discover short-term certifications in areas like data analytics, neuroimaging, or clinical research that often pay well and complement your main studies.

If you’re interested in a smoother educational pathway, consider some of the easiest college majors that still connect to neuroscience or health science. Balancing your passions, earning potential, and workload can help you chart the right path toward a successful neuroscience career.

Best Scientists Citing M. Christian Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles