World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
30794
World Ranking
12645
National Ranking
6469

David P. Corey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Corey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 182 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David P. Corey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Corey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Corey is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience. Their research mainly focuses on Molecular Biology and Sensory Systems, with additional work in Cognitive Neuroscience, Immunology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's primary research topics include:

  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • RNA regulation and disease
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Retinal Development and Disorders

Frequent coauthors with whom David P. Corey collaborates are:

  • Maryna V. Ivanchenko
  • Kevin T. Booth
  • Yaqiao Li
  • Artur A. Indzhykulian
  • Cole W. Peters

The scientist has published in notable venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Hearing Research
  • Biophysical Journal
  • Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development

Selected recent papers of David P. Corey include:

  • AAV-S: A versatile capsid variant for transduction of mouse and primate inner ear, 2021, Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • Preclinical testing of AAV9-PHP.B for transgene expression in the non-human primate cochlea, 2020, Hearing Research
  • Mini-PCDH15 gene therapy rescues hearing in a mouse model of Usher syndrome type 1F, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Viral vectors for gene delivery to the inner ear, 2020, Hearing Research
  • Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals the dynamic strength of the hair-cell tip-link connection, 2021, Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • TRPA1 Contributes to Cold, Mechanical, and Chemical Nociception but Is Not Essential for Hair-Cell Transduction

    Kelvin Y. Kwan;Andrew J. Allchorne;Melissa A. Vollrath;Adam P. Christensen

  • The early-onset torsion dystonia gene (DYT1) encodes an ATP-binding protein

    Laurie J. Ozelius;Jeffrey W. Hewett;Curtis E. Page;Susan B. Bressman

  • Sensitivity, polarity, and conductance change in the response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli

    A J Hudspeth;D P Corey

  • TRPA1 is a candidate for the mechanosensitive transduction channel of vertebrate hair cells

    David P. Corey;David P. Corey;Jaime Garcia-Añoveros;Jeffrey R. Holt;Kelvin Y. Kwan;Kelvin Y. Kwan

  • A reinterpretation of mammalian sodium channel gating based on single channel recording

    Richard W Aldrich;D. P. Corey;C. F. Stevens

  • Kinetics of the receptor current in bullfrog saccular hair cells.

    DP Corey;AJ Hudspeth

  • Ionic basis of the receptor potential in a vertebrate hair cell.

    D. P. Corey;A. J. Hudspeth

  • Tip-link integrity and mechanical transduction in vertebrate hair cells

    John A. Assad;Gordon M.G. Shepherd;David P. Corey;David P. Corey

  • Lighting up the senses: FM1-43 loading of sensory cells through nonselective ion channels

    Jason R. Meyers;Richard B. MacDonald;Anne Duggan;David Lenzi

  • TRP2: A candidate transduction channel for mammalian pheromone sensory signaling

    Emily R. Liman;David P. Corey;Catherine Dulac

  • TRP channels in mechanosensation: direct or indirect activation?

    Adam P. Christensen;David P. Corey

  • Expression in cochlea and retina of myosin VIIa, the gene product defective in Usher syndrome type 1B

    Tama Hasson;Matthew B. Heintzelman;Joseph Santos-Sacchi;David P. Corey

  • TRPA1 channels regulate astrocyte resting calcium and inhibitory synapse efficacy through GAT-3

    Eiji Shigetomi;Xiaoping Tong;Kelvin Y Kwan;David P Corey

  • Ion channels in vertebrate glia.

    B. A. Barres;L. L. Y. Chun;D. P. Corey

  • BNaC1 and BNaC2 constitute a new family of human neuronal sodium channels related to degenerins and epithelial sodium channels

    Jaime García-Añoveros;Bruce Derfler;Janine Neville-Golden;Bradley T. Hyman

  • Gene Expression by Mouse Inner Ear Hair Cells during Development

    Déborah I. Scheffer;Jun Shen;David P. Corey;Zheng-Yi Chen

  • Adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog's sacculus

    RA Eatock;DP Corey;AJ Hudspeth

  • A Chemical-Genetic Strategy Implicates Myosin-1c in Adaptation by Hair Cells

    Jeffrey R. Holt;Susan K.H. Gillespie;D.William Provance;Kavita Shah

  • TRPA1 Modulates Mechanotransduction in Cutaneous Sensory Neurons

    Kelvin Y. Kwan;Joshua M. Glazer;David P. Corey;Frank L. Rice

  • Ion channel expression by white matter glia: the O-2A glial progenitor cell.

    Barbara A. Barres;Barbara A. Barres;Walter J. Koroshetz;Kenton J. Swartz;Linda L.Y. Chun

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey R. Holt
Jeffrey R. Holt Boston Children's Hospital
Xandra O. Breakefield
Xandra O. Breakefield Harvard University
A. J. Hudspeth
A. J. Hudspeth Howard Hughes Medical Institute
John A. Assad
John A. Assad Harvard University
Mark S. Mooseker
Mark S. Mooseker Yale University
Gordon M. Shepherd
Gordon M. Shepherd Yale School of Medicine
Mohsen Asadnia
Mohsen Asadnia Macquarie University
Stephen C. Cannon
Stephen C. Cannon University of California, Los Angeles
Laurie J. Ozelius
Laurie J. Ozelius Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to the traditional route of medical school. There are various online degrees and certifications that can help you enter or advance within the healthcare field, often with more flexibility and lower costs.

For those aspiring to become advanced practice nurses, the best online dnp programs can lead to high-level clinical roles and leadership positions. If your interest is in pharmaceuticals, consider exploring online pharmacist programs to become a licensed pharmacist with a doctorate.

Alternative pathways include earning a health information management bachelor degree online, preparing you for roles managing patient data and healthcare technology. Additionally, medical billing and coding professionals are in demand, and the average cost of medical billing and coding program is significantly lower than more extensive medical degrees, making it an accessible entry point.

These online options provide flexible, affordable opportunities for students with diverse interests in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing David P. Corey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles