| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 60 | 3867 | 3539 | 1759 | 1585 | 143 | 11822 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen C. Cannon between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen C. Cannon published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2018. 3 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.
181 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1970 | 1 |
| 1971 | 0 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 1 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 1 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 0 |
| 1987 | 2 |
| 1988 | 0 |
| 1989 | 2 |
| 1990 | 1 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 2 |
| 1993 | 7 |
| 1994 | 2 |
| 1995 | 4 |
| 1996 | 7 |
| 1997 | 3 |
| 1998 | 3 |
| 1999 | 4 |
| 2000 | 9 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2002 | 6 |
| 2003 | 2 |
| 2004 | 2 |
| 2005 | 5 |
| 2006 | 3 |
| 2007 | 4 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2010 | 4 |
| 2011 | 8 |
| 2012 | 5 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 4 |
| 2015 | 4 |
| 2016 | 5 |
| 2017 | 4 |
| 2018 | 18 |
| 2019 | 11 |
| 2020 | 8 |
| 2021 | 7 |
| 2022 | 4 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2025 | 2 |
| Total | 181 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Cannon sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 143 publications — 39th percentile
39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | 143 |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Cannon sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile
61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | 60 |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
Ami Mankodi;Masanori P. Takahashi;Hong Jiang;Carol L. Beck
S. C. Cannon;D. A. Robinson
S. L. Venance;S. C. Cannon;D. Fialho;B. Fontaine
Daniel Fisher;Bin Xing;John Dill;Hui Li
Rajesh Ranganathan;Stephen C. Cannon;H. Robert Horvitz
Jeffrey M. Statland;Bertrand Fontaine;Michael G. Hanna;Nicholas E. Johnson
Stephen C. Cannon;David A. Robinson;Shihab Shamma
Stephen C. Cannon;Robert H. Brown;David P. Corey;David P. Corey
Stephen C. Cannon;David A. Robinson
E. Matthews;D. Fialho;S. V. Tan;S. L. Venance
Stephen C. Cannon
Stephen C. Cannon;Stephen M. Strittmatter
Stephen C. Cannon
Akira Tsujino;Chantal Maertens;Kinji Ohno;Xin-Ming Shen
Stephen C. Cannon;George I. Zahalak
S.C. Cannon;R.H. Brown;D.P. Corey
Arie F. Struyk;Stephen C. Cannon
Lawrence J. Hayward;Robert H. Brown;Stephen C. Cannon
Benjamin R. Nelson;Fenfen Wu;Yun Liu;Douglas M. Anderson
Lawrence J. Hayward;Gisela M. Sandoval;Stephen C. Cannon
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.