World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5308
World Ranking
11291
National Ranking
31

Robert W. Lindeman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Lindeman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 197 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert W. Lindeman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Lindeman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert W. Lindeman is affiliated with the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. Their research spans multiple fields within computer science and psychology, with a focus on human-computer interaction and virtual reality.

The primary fields of study for Lindeman include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

The subfields of study they contribute to include:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Surgery

Lindeman's work covers a diverse range of topics, mainly focusing on:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation

They have frequently published in venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)
  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)
  • Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Notable recent papers by Lindeman include:

  • "Using a Fully Expressive Avatar to Collaborate in Virtual Reality: Evaluation of Task Performance, Presence, and Attraction" (2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality)
  • "Perspective: Does Realism Improve Presence in VR? Suggesting a Model and Metric for VR Experience Evaluation" (2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality)
  • "Floor-vibration VR: Mitigating Cybersickness Using Whole-body Tactile Stimuli in Highly Realistic Vehicle Driving Experiences" (2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics)
  • "Eliciting real cravings with virtual food: Using immersive technologies to explore the effects of food stimuli in virtual reality" (2023, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "The Impact of Multi-sensory Stimuli on Confidence Levels for Perceptual-cognitive Tasks in VR" (2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR))

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Sungchul Jung
  • Simon Hoermann
  • Yuanjie Wu
  • Ryan Douglas McKee
  • Holger Regenbrecht

Best Publications

  • A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

    Arindam Dey;Mark Billinghurst;Robert W. Lindeman;J. Edward Swan

  • Mini-Me: An Adaptive Avatar for Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration

    Thammathip Piumsomboon;Gun A. Lee;Jonathon D. Hart;Barrett Ens

  • Exploring natural eye-gaze-based interaction for immersive virtual reality

    Thammathip Piumsomboon;Gun Lee;Robert W. Lindeman;Mark Billinghurst

  • Hand-held windows: towards effective 2D interaction in immersive virtual environments

    R.W. Lindeman;J.L. Sibert;J.K. Hahn

  • Towards usable VR: an empirical study of user interfaces for immersive virtual environments

    Robert W. Lindeman;John L. Sibert;James K. Hahn

  • Towards full-body haptic feedback: the design and deployment of a spatialized vibrotactile feedback system

    Robert W. Lindeman;Robert Page;Yasuyuki Yanagida;John L. Sibert

  • Effectiveness of directional vibrotactile cuing on a building-clearing task

    Robert W. Lindeman;John L. Sibert;Erick Mendez-Mendez;Sachin Patil

  • A multi-class pattern recognition system for practical finger spelling translation

    Jose L. Hernandez-Rebollar;Robert W. Lindeman;Nicholas Kyriakopoulos

  • Wearable vibrotactile systems for virtual contact and information display

    Unknown

  • A new instrumented approach for translating American Sign Language into sound and text

    J.L. Hernandez-Rebollar;N. Kyriakopoulos;R.W. Lindeman

  • On Your Feet!: Enhancing Vection in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli

    Ernst Kruijff;Alexander Marquardt;Christina Trepkowski;Robert W. Lindeman

  • A SWOT Analysis of the Field of Virtual Reality for Firefighter Training.

    Hendrik Engelbrecht;Robert W. Lindeman;Simon Hoermann

  • Integrating algorithm animation into a learning environment

    Charles Kann;Robert W. Lindeman;Rachelle Heller

  • Vibrotactile letter reading using a low-resolution tactor array

    Y. Yanagida;M. Kakita;R.W. Lindeman;Y. Kume

  • The AcceleGlove: a whole-hand input device for virtual reality

    Jose L. Hernandez-Rebollar;Nicholas Kyriakopoulos;Robert W. Lindeman

  • Creating a Stressful Decision Making Environment for Aerial Firefighter Training in Virtual Reality

    Rory M.S. Clifford;Sungchul Jung;Simon Hoerrnann;Mark Billinqhurst

  • Effective Vibrotactile Cueing in a Visual Search Task

    Robert W. Lindeman;Yasuyuki Yanagida;John L. Sibert;Robert A. Lavine

  • The effect of 3D widget representation and simulated surface constraints on interaction in virtual environments

    R.W. Lindeman;J.L. Sibert;J.N. Templeman

  • Hear-Through and Mic-Through Augmented Reality: Using Bone Conduction to Display Spatialized Audio

    R.W. Lindeman;H. Noma;P.G. de Barros

  • Using a Fully Expressive Avatar to Collaborate in Virtual Reality: Evaluation of Task Performance, Presence, and Attraction

    Yuanjie Wu;Yu Wang;Sungchul Jung;Simon Hoermann

  • An initial exploration of a multi-sensory design space: Tactile support for walking in immersive virtual environments

    Mi Feng;Arindam Dey;Robert W. Lindeman

  • Exploring the design space for multi-sensory heart rate feedback in immersive virtual reality

    Hao Chen;Arindam Dey;Mark Billinghurst;Robert W. Lindeman

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Billinghurst
Mark Billinghurst University of South Australia
Gun A. Lee
Gun A. Lee University of South Australia
Sonia Chernova
Sonia Chernova Georgia Institute of Technology
Mary C. Whitton
Mary C. Whitton University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Anthony Steed
Anthony Steed University College London
Kiyoshi Kiyokawa
Kiyoshi Kiyokawa Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Bernhard E. Riecke
Bernhard E. Riecke Simon Fraser University
Matthew O. Ward
Matthew O. Ward University of Southern Mississippi
Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé Tufts University
Sachin Patil
Sachin Patil University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science education in the USA opens up diverse and flexible online options for career advancement. Many students are seeking the fastest masters degree online to accelerate their skills and employability without compromising on quality. These programs are designed for those who want to quickly transition into in-demand tech roles.

Choosing the right degree is vital for your career. Prospective students often look for the most valuable masters degrees to ensure their investment pays off in terms of job prospects and earning potential. Computer science continues to dominate such lists due to high demand and lucrative opportunities.

For those starting out or looking for speedy entry into the workforce, 1 year associate degree programs online offer a practical pathway. These programs provide essential foundational knowledge and can help students qualify for entry-level tech jobs.

Affordability remains a key concern. Luckily, there are numerous cheapest online colleges offering accredited computer science degrees, making advanced education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Lindeman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles