World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 36 11289 10966 31 29 197 5308

Robert W. Lindeman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert W. Lindeman between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert W. Lindeman published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2018. 9 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2018. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1982 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert W. Lindeman: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 4
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 5
2004 5
2005 7
2006 7
2007 3
2008 4
2009 5
2010 2
2011 8
2012 6
2013 4
2014 6
2015 7
2016 10
2017 15
2018 17
2019 17
2020 15
2021 16
2022 12
2023 11
2024 6
2025 3
Total 207
Download as CSV

Robert W. Lindeman publications per year - data summary

  • Robert W. Lindeman, a Computer Science scholar from University of Canterbury, has 207 publications recorded across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2018 and 2019, with 17 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 1993, 1996, 1997 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 12 of the 44 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1984, 1985, 1986 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.5 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 48 publications, 23% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1996: 3 publications (0.2 per year); 1997-2011: 59 publications (3.9 per year); 2012-2025: 145 publications (10.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Robert W. Lindeman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Lindeman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 197 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 197
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert W. Lindeman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Robert W. Lindeman, a Computer Science scholar from University of Canterbury, records 197 publications - the 45th percentile of the discipline.
  • 45% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Robert W. Lindeman, and about 55% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Robert W. Lindeman ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Robert W. Lindeman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Lindeman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 36
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Robert W. Lindeman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Robert W. Lindeman, a Computer Science scholar from University of Canterbury, records 36 D-Index - the 23rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 23% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Robert W. Lindeman, and about 77% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Robert W. Lindeman ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Robert W. Lindeman is affiliated with the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. Their research spans multiple fields within computer science and psychology, with a focus on human-computer interaction and virtual reality.

The primary fields of study for Lindeman include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

The subfields of study they contribute to include:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Surgery

Lindeman's work covers a diverse range of topics, mainly focusing on:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation

They have frequently published in venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)
  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)
  • Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Notable recent papers by Lindeman include:

  • "Using a Fully Expressive Avatar to Collaborate in Virtual Reality: Evaluation of Task Performance, Presence, and Attraction" (2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality)
  • "Perspective: Does Realism Improve Presence in VR? Suggesting a Model and Metric for VR Experience Evaluation" (2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality)
  • "Floor-vibration VR: Mitigating Cybersickness Using Whole-body Tactile Stimuli in Highly Realistic Vehicle Driving Experiences" (2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics)
  • "Eliciting real cravings with virtual food: Using immersive technologies to explore the effects of food stimuli in virtual reality" (2023, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "The Impact of Multi-sensory Stimuli on Confidence Levels for Perceptual-cognitive Tasks in VR" (2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR))

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Sungchul Jung
  • Simon Hoermann
  • Yuanjie Wu
  • Ryan Douglas McKee
  • Holger Regenbrecht

Best Publications

  • A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

    Arindam Dey;Mark Billinghurst;Robert W. Lindeman;J. Edward Swan

  • Mini-Me: An Adaptive Avatar for Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration

    Thammathip Piumsomboon;Gun A. Lee;Jonathon D. Hart;Barrett Ens

  • Exploring natural eye-gaze-based interaction for immersive virtual reality

    Thammathip Piumsomboon;Gun Lee;Robert W. Lindeman;Mark Billinghurst

  • Hand-held windows: towards effective 2D interaction in immersive virtual environments

    R.W. Lindeman;J.L. Sibert;J.K. Hahn

  • Towards usable VR: an empirical study of user interfaces for immersive virtual environments

    Robert W. Lindeman;John L. Sibert;James K. Hahn

  • Towards full-body haptic feedback: the design and deployment of a spatialized vibrotactile feedback system

    Robert W. Lindeman;Robert Page;Yasuyuki Yanagida;John L. Sibert

  • Effectiveness of directional vibrotactile cuing on a building-clearing task

    Robert W. Lindeman;John L. Sibert;Erick Mendez-Mendez;Sachin Patil

  • A multi-class pattern recognition system for practical finger spelling translation

    Jose L. Hernandez-Rebollar;Robert W. Lindeman;Nicholas Kyriakopoulos

  • Wearable vibrotactile systems for virtual contact and information display

    Unknown

  • A new instrumented approach for translating American Sign Language into sound and text

    J.L. Hernandez-Rebollar;N. Kyriakopoulos;R.W. Lindeman

  • On Your Feet!: Enhancing Vection in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli

    Ernst Kruijff;Alexander Marquardt;Christina Trepkowski;Robert W. Lindeman

  • A SWOT Analysis of the Field of Virtual Reality for Firefighter Training.

    Hendrik Engelbrecht;Robert W. Lindeman;Simon Hoermann

  • Integrating algorithm animation into a learning environment

    Charles Kann;Robert W. Lindeman;Rachelle Heller

  • Vibrotactile letter reading using a low-resolution tactor array

    Y. Yanagida;M. Kakita;R.W. Lindeman;Y. Kume

  • The AcceleGlove: a whole-hand input device for virtual reality

    Jose L. Hernandez-Rebollar;Nicholas Kyriakopoulos;Robert W. Lindeman

  • Creating a Stressful Decision Making Environment for Aerial Firefighter Training in Virtual Reality

    Rory M.S. Clifford;Sungchul Jung;Simon Hoerrnann;Mark Billinqhurst

  • Effective Vibrotactile Cueing in a Visual Search Task

    Robert W. Lindeman;Yasuyuki Yanagida;John L. Sibert;Robert A. Lavine

  • The effect of 3D widget representation and simulated surface constraints on interaction in virtual environments

    R.W. Lindeman;J.L. Sibert;J.N. Templeman

  • Hear-Through and Mic-Through Augmented Reality: Using Bone Conduction to Display Spatialized Audio

    R.W. Lindeman;H. Noma;P.G. de Barros

  • An initial exploration of a multi-sensory design space: Tactile support for walking in immersive virtual environments

    Mi Feng;Arindam Dey;Robert W. Lindeman

  • Exploring the design space for multi-sensory heart rate feedback in immersive virtual reality

    Hao Chen;Arindam Dey;Mark Billinghurst;Robert W. Lindeman

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Billinghurst
Mark Billinghurst University of South Australia
Gun A. Lee
Gun A. Lee University of South Australia
Tobias Langlotz
Tobias Langlotz Aarhus University
Mary C. Whitton
Mary C. Whitton University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sonia Chernova
Sonia Chernova Georgia Institute of Technology
Anthony Steed
Anthony Steed University College London
Holger Regenbrecht
Holger Regenbrecht University of Otago
Matthew O. Ward
Matthew O. Ward University of Southern Mississippi
Bernhard E. Riecke
Bernhard E. Riecke Simon Fraser University
Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science education in the USA opens up diverse and flexible online options for career advancement. Many students are seeking the fastest masters degree online to accelerate their skills and employability without compromising on quality. These programs are designed for those who want to quickly transition into in-demand tech roles.

Choosing the right degree is vital for your career. Prospective students often look for the most valuable masters degrees to ensure their investment pays off in terms of job prospects and earning potential. Computer science continues to dominate such lists due to high demand and lucrative opportunities.

For those starting out or looking for speedy entry into the workforce, 1 year associate degree programs online offer a practical pathway. These programs provide essential foundational knowledge and can help students qualify for entry-level tech jobs.

Affordability remains a key concern. Luckily, there are numerous cheapest online colleges offering accredited computer science degrees, making advanced education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Lindeman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles