World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 10748 10093 5526 5107 422 39405

James N. George publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James N. George between 1965 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James N. George published across 61 years, from 1965 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2007. 10 of the 445 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2007. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 2 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 5 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 26 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 30 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 3 publications
1965 2025

445 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James N. George: publications per year, 1965 to 2025
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 2
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 5
1977 2
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 3
1986 4
1987 2
1988 2
1989 0
1990 2
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 5
1995 1
1996 5
1997 5
1998 12
1999 4
2000 11
2001 12
2002 5
2003 16
2004 26
2005 13
2006 18
2007 30
2008 22
2009 26
2010 18
2011 9
2012 25
2013 16
2014 13
2015 15
2016 11
2017 14
2018 10
2019 16
2020 6
2021 10
2022 14
2023 10
2024 7
2025 3
Total 445
Download as CSV

James N. George publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. George sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 422 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 422
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

James N. George D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. George sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James N. George is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Immunology and Microbiology. Within these fields, their work extensively covers subfields such as Hematology, Immunology, Genetics, Nephrology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Complement system in diseases
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
  • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders

James N. George has contributed to multiple scientific papers, among which recent notable publications are:

  • "Annual incidence and severity of acute episodes in hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura" (2021), published in Blood
  • "Severe thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia in pregnancy: A guide for the consulting hematologist" (2021), published in American Journal of Hematology
  • "Immune Thrombocytopenia Treatment" (2021), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Morbidities and mortality in patients with hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura" (2021), published in Blood Advances
  • "Shared decision making, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and caplacizumab" (2020), published in American Journal of Hematology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with James N. George include:

  • Azra Borogovac
  • Erika Tarasco
  • Kenneth D. Friedman
  • Paul Knöbl
  • Masanori Matsumoto

The scientist has published extensively in prominent venues, with a concentration of work in:

  • Blood
  • American Journal of Hematology
  • Blood Advances
  • Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Hämostaseologie

Best Publications

  • Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group

    Francesco Rodeghiero;Roberto Stasi;Terry Gernsheimer;Marc Michel

  • Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a practice guideline developed by explicit methods for the American Society of Hematology.

    JN George;SH Woolf;GE Raskob;JS Wasser

  • Syndromes of Thrombotic Microangiopathy

    James N. George;Carla M. Nester

  • Efficacy of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a double-blind randomised controlled trial

    David J. Kuter;James B. Bussel;Roger M. Lyons;Vinod Pullarkat

  • American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia

    Cindy Neunert;Deirdra R. Terrell;Donald M. Arnold;George Buchanan

  • Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

    James N. George

  • ADAMTS13 activity in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura–hemolytic uremic syndrome: relation to presenting features and clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort of 142 patients

    Sara K. Vesely;James N. George;Bernhard Lämmle;Jan Dirk Studt

  • Splenectomy for adult patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review to assess long-term platelet count responses, prediction of response, and surgical complications

    Kiarash Kojouri;Sara K. Vesely;Deirdra R. Terrell;James N. George

  • Dose of prophylactic platelet transfusions and prevention of hemorrhage.

    Sherrill J. Slichter;Richard M. Kaufman;Susan F. Assmann;Jeffrey McCullough

  • Survival and relapse in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

    Johanna A. Kremer Hovinga;Sara K. Vesely;Deirdra R. Terrell;Bernhard Lämmle

  • AMG 531, a thrombopoiesis-stimulating protein, for chronic ITP.

    James B. Bussel;David J. Kuter;James N. George;Robert McMillan

  • Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review of Published Case Reports

    James N. George;Gary E. Raskob;Shehla Rizvi Shah;Mujahid A. Rizvi

  • How I treat patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: 2010

    James N. George

  • The incidence of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children and adults: A critical review of published reports.

    Deirdra R. Terrell;Laura A. Beebe;Sara K. Vesely;Barbara R. Neas

  • Molecular Defects in Interactions of Platelets with the Vessel Wall

    James N. George;Alan T. Nurden;David R. Phillips

  • How I treat patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome.

    James N. George

  • Diagnostic criteria for hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated microangiopathy : results of a consensus process by an International Working Group

    Tapani Ruutu;Giovanni Barosi;Richard J. Benjamin;Richard E. Clark

  • The incidence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome: all patients, idiopathic patients, and patients with severe ADAMTS-13 deficiency.

    D. R. Terrell;L. A. Williams;S. K. Vesely;B. Lämmle

  • Recent Advances in Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

    J. Evan Sadler;Joel L. Moake;Toshiyuki Miyata;James N. George

  • The clinical importance of acquired abnormalities of platelet function

    James N. George;Sanford J. Shattil

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernhard Lämmle
Bernhard Lämmle University of Bern
Gary E. Raskob
Gary E. Raskob University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
James B. Bussel
James B. Bussel Cornell University
Richard H. Aster
Richard H. Aster Medical College of Wisconsin
Robert McMillan
Robert McMillan Scripps Research Institute
Judith A. James
Judith A. James Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Brian R. Curtis
Brian R. Curtis University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Reinhard Schneppenheim
Reinhard Schneppenheim Universität Hamburg
Douglas B. Cines
Douglas B. Cines University of Pennsylvania
James W. Smith
James W. Smith McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up a variety of alternative and complementary paths, many of which are now accessible through flexible online programs. For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing one of the cheapest mha programs online can be an affordable way to advance into hospital or clinic administration roles.

Nurses aiming for the highest levels of practice might consider the cheapest dnp online programs, which provide an efficient route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree while balancing work with study. Similarly, aspiring pharmacists can now start their journey toward licensure by enrolling in an online pharmacist degree, offering a more accessible option for those unable to attend traditional campus-based programs.

Another promising field is health informatics, where students learn to manage and analyze healthcare data to improve patient outcomes. Those seeking a cost-effective program in this area can look into health informatics degrees online.

Each of these online options supports diverse career pathways in the healthcare sector, allowing for flexibility, affordability, and continued professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing James N. George

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles