World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
25480
World Ranking
12804
National Ranking
6543

Neuroscience

D-Index
89
Citations
25474
World Ranking
1166
National Ranking
599

Arnold Starr publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold Starr sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 283 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Arnold Starr D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold Starr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arnold Starr was affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research focused primarily on the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with particular emphasis on subfields such as Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Sensory Systems.

The topics addressed in Starr's work spanned several specialized areas including:

  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
  • Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
  • Pregnancy-related Medical Research
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception

Starr published research in prominent venues such as:

  • Injury
  • Cochlear Implants International

Among their recent papers were:

  • "Clinical and radiographic predictors for angiography in pelvic trauma: An analysis of 1703 patients," published in 2024 in Injury
  • "Customized strategies for managing cochlear implant stimulation side effects," published in 2025 in Cochlear Implants International

Throughout their career, Starr collaborated with several frequent co-authors including Christoffer Johansen, Vicente A. Mejia, Marinda G. Scrushy, Simon Tiziani, and Peter C. Cannamela. Each of these co-authors contributed to the development and extension of the research topics Starr explored.

Best Publications

  • Auditory Brain Stem Responses in Neurological Disease

    Arnold Starr;L. Joseph Achor

  • Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects

    Douglas S Goodin;Kenneth C Squires;Beverley H Henderson;Arnold Starr

  • Long latency event-related components of the auditory evoked potential in dementia

    Douglas S. Goodin;Kenneth C. Squires;Arnold Starr

  • Correlation between confirmed sites of neurological lesions and abnormalities of far-field auditory brainstem responses

    A Starr

  • An Integrated-Circuit Approach to Extracellular Microelectrodes

    Kensall D. Wise;James B. Angell;Arnold Starr

  • Development of auditory function in newborn infants revealed by auditory brainstem potentials.

    A. Starr;R. N. Amlie;W. H. Martin;S. Sanders

  • Clinical and Pathological Evidence for a Frontal Variant of Alzheimer Disease

    Julene K. Johnson;Elizabeth Head;Ronald Kim;Arnold Starr

  • Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings

    L.Joseph Achor;Arnold Starr

  • Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy.

    Fan-Gang Zeng;Sandy Oba;Smita Garde;Yvonne Sininger

  • Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity

    Fan-Gang Zeng;Ying-Yee Kong;Henry J. Michalewski;Arnold Starr

  • The varieties of auditory neuropathy.

    Starr A;Sininger Ys;Pratt H

  • Auditory brain-stem responses in brain death.

    Arnold Starr

  • P300 Latency Correlates with Digit Span

    John Polich;Lawrence Howard;Arnold Starr

  • Auditory neuropathy--neural and synaptic mechanisms.

    Tobias Moser;Arnold Starr

  • Non-syndromic recessive auditory neuropathy is the result of mutations in the otoferlin (OTOF) gene

    R Varga;P M Kelley;B J Keats;A Starr

  • Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions

    L J Achor;A Starr

  • Enhancement of motor cortical excitability in humans by non-invasive electrical stimulation appears prior to voluntary movement.

    A. Starr;M. Caramia;F. Zarola;P.M. Rossini

  • Localization, timing and specificity of gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement in man.

    Leonardo G. Cohen;Arnold Starr

  • EFFECTS OF AGE ON THE P300 COMPONENT OF THE EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL FROM AUDITORY-STIMULI - PEAK DEFINITION, VARIATION, AND MEASUREMENT

    John Polich;Lawrence Howard;Arnold Starr

  • Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans.

    Manuel Don;Aaron R. Allen;Arnold Starr

Frequent Co-Authors

Henry J. Michalewski
Henry J. Michalewski University of California, Irvine
Hillel Pratt
Hillel Pratt Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Fan-Gang Zeng
Fan-Gang Zeng University of California, Irvine
Bronya J.B. Keats
Bronya J.B. Keats Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
Douglas S. Goodin
Douglas S. Goodin University of California, San Francisco
Monte S. Buchsbaum
Monte S. Buchsbaum University of California, San Diego
John Polich
John Polich Scripps Research Institute
Julene K. Johnson
Julene K. Johnson University of California, San Francisco
Lüder Deecke
Lüder Deecke Medical University of Vienna
Sudhir Gupta
Sudhir Gupta University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Arnold Starr

Recently Published Articles