World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
7384
World Ranking
7823
National Ranking
92

Jean-Michel Guerit publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Michel Guerit sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jean-Michel Guerit D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Michel Guerit sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean-Michel Guerit is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium and has contributed to medical research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including General Health Professions, Cell Biology, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Their research interests focus on topics such as:

  • Health, Medicine and Society
  • Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Jean-Michel Guerit has published several papers, predominantly in the journal Consilio manuque. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Traumatismes crânio-cérébraux de l'adulte" (2022) in Consilio manuque
  • "Le syndrome de la douleur myofasciale" (2020) in Consilio manuque
  • "La prise en charge en urgence des pathologies neurovasculaires" (2024) in Consilio manuque

Other papers linked to their research network include "La perte de chance" (2023) and "Les complications liées aux trocarts: un problème spécifique et parfois fatal de l'approche laparoscopique" (2025), both published in the same venue.

Collaborations have been an important component of their work. Frequent co-authors of Jean-Michel Guerit include:

  • Valérie Englebert
  • Matthieu Pierre Rutgers
  • Quentin Alaluf
  • Sabrina Channaoui
  • Philippe De Smet

The publication venue most associated with their work is Consilio manuque, which has featured six of their contributions. This indicates a consistent focus on journals dedicated to their areas of specialty.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials

    G. Cruccu;M.J. Aminoff;G. Curio;J.M. Guerit

  • IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG

    Marc R. Nuwer;Giancarlo Comi;Ronald Emerson;Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen

  • Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect : an event-related potentials study

    Bruno Rossion;Jean-François Delvenne;D. Debatisse;Valérie Goffaux

  • Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials

    Valéry Legrain;Jean-Michel Guérit;Raymond Bruyer;Léon Plaghki

  • Categorical Perception of Happiness and Fear Facial Expressions: An ERP Study

    S. Campanella;P. Quinet;R. Bruyer;M. Crommelinck

  • Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study.

    Bruno Rossion;Salvatore Campanella;Carlos M. Gomez;A Delinte

  • Discrimination of emotional facial expressions in a visual oddball task: an ERP study.

    Salvatore Campanella;C Gaspard;Damien Debatisse;Raymond Bruyer

  • Non-phase locked electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to CO2 laser skin stimulations may reflect central interactions between A∂- and C-fibre afferent volleys

    André Mouraux;Jean-Michel Guerit;Léon Plaghki

  • Spectral versus visual EEG analysis in mild hepatic encephalopathy.

    P. Amodio;P. Marchetti;F. Del Piccolo;M. de Tourtchaninoff

  • Consensus on the use of neurophysiological tests in the intensive care unit (ICU): electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), and electroneuromyography (ENMG).

    J.-M. Guérit;A. Amantini;P. Amodio;K.V. Andersen

  • Right N170 modulation in a face discrimination task: an account for categorical perception of familiar faces.

    Salvatore Campanella;Catherine Hanoteau;D Dépy;D Dépy;Bruno Rossion

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to prevent cerebral ischaemia in the operating room

    Geneviève Florence;Jean Michel Guerit;Bernard Gueguen

  • Neurophysiological investigations of hepatic encephalopathy: ISHEN practice guidelines.

    Jean-Michel Guerit;Aldo Amantini;Catherine Fischer;Peter W. Kaplan

  • Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: an event-related potentials study.

    Salvatore Campanella;Mandy Rossignol;Sandrine Mejias;Frédéric Joassin

  • Propofol infusion syndrome associated with short-term large-dose infusion during surgical anesthesia in an adult.

    Antonios Liolios;Jean-Michel Guérit;Jean-Louis Scholtes;Christian Raftopoulos

  • Pudendal Cortical Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

    R.J. Opsomer;J.M. Guerit;F.X. Wese;P.J. Van Cangh

  • Nociceptive processing in the human brain of infrequent task-relevant and task-irrelevant noxious stimuli. A study with event-related potentials evoked by CO2 laser radiant heat stimuli.

    Valéry Legrain;Raymond Bruyer;Jean-Michel Guérit;Léon Plaghki

  • ERPs obtained with the auditory oddball paradigm in coma and altered states of consciousness: clinical relationships, prognostic value, and origin of components

    Jean-Michel Guérit;Donatienne Verougstraete;Marianne de Tourtchaninoff;Damien Debatisse

  • The prognostic value of three-modality evoked potentials (TMEPs) in anoxic and traumatic comas.

    JM Guérit;M de Tourtchaninoff;L Soveges;P Mahieu

  • Neuromonitoring in the operating room: why, when, and how to monitor?

    Jean-Michel Guérit

  • Recommendations for the use of electroencephalography and evoked potentials in comatose patients

    Nathalie André-Obadia;Nathalie André-Obadia;Julie Zyss;Martine Gavaret;Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond Bruyer
Raymond Bruyer Université Catholique de Louvain
Salvatore Campanella
Salvatore Campanella Université Libre de Bruxelles
Bruno Rossion
Bruno Rossion University of Lorraine
Léon Plaghki
Léon Plaghki Université Catholique de Louvain
Valéry Legrain
Valéry Legrain Université Catholique de Louvain
André Mouraux
André Mouraux Université Catholique de Louvain
Lawrence Weiskrantz
Lawrence Weiskrantz University of Oxford
François Mauguière
François Mauguière Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Angelo Gatta
Angelo Gatta University of Padua
Luis Garcia-Larrea
Luis Garcia-Larrea Claude Bernard University Lyon 1

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Michel Guerit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles