World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
11693
World Ranking
4785
National Ranking
2649

Thomas L. Rodebaugh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas L. Rodebaugh sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas L. Rodebaugh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas L. Rodebaugh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas L. Rodebaugh is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research output spans multiple fields with a focus on Psychology and Medicine, contributing to a total of 68 publications in Psychology and 63 in Medicine.

The subfields where Rodebaugh has been most active include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, and Surgery. This diverse range reflects a multidisciplinary approach integrating psychological and medical perspectives.

The topics that Rodebaugh commonly addresses cover a wide spectrum within mental health and related areas. Key themes in their work include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Their publications appear frequently in several scholarly venues. The most common journals and their associated number of publications are:

  • JAMA (3 publications)
  • Neurosurgery (3 publications)
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (3 publications)
  • Clinical Psychological Science (3 publications)
  • Psychotherapy Research (2 publications)

Rodebaugh has collaborated extensively with several researchers, showing a pattern of repeated coauthorship. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Madelyn Frumkin (28 joint publications)
  • Jay F. Piccirillo (17 joint publications)
  • Saad Javeed (13 joint publications)
  • Jacob K. Greenberg (13 joint publications)
  • Justin K. Zhang (12 joint publications)

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Rodebaugh include:

  • "Effects of Mindfulness Training and Exercise on Cognitive Function in Older Adults" (2022, JAMA)
  • "Feasibility and utility of idiographic models in the clinic: A pilot study" (2020, Psychotherapy Research)
  • "mHealth Assessment and Intervention of Depression and Anxiety in Older Adults" (2020, Harvard Review of Psychiatry)
  • "Tinnitus" (2020, JAMA)
  • "Personalized networks of social anxiety disorder and depression and implications for treatment" (2021, Journal of Affective Disorders)

Best Publications

  • The treatment of social anxiety disorder

    Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Robert M. Holaway;Richard G. Heimberg

  • Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety disorders

    Chad Sylvester;Maurizio Corbetta;Marcus Raichle;T. L. Rodebaugh

  • More information from fewer questions: the factor structure and item properties of the original and brief fear of negative evaluation scale.

    Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Carol M. Woods;David M. Thissen;Richard G. Heimberg

  • The Fear of Positive Evaluation Scale: Assessing a proposed cognitive component of social anxiety

    Justin W. Weeks;Richard G. Heimberg;Thomas L. Rodebaugh

  • The Reverse of Social Anxiety Is Not Always the Opposite: The Reverse-Scored Items of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale Do Not Belong

    Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Carol M. Woods;Carol M. Woods;Richard G. Heimberg;Richard G. Heimberg

  • Loneliness over time: the crucial role of social anxiety

    Michelle H. Lim;Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Michael J. Zyphur;John Francis Martin Gleeson

  • Exploring the relationship between fear of positive evaluation and social anxiety.

    Justin W. Weeks;Richard G. Heimberg;Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Peter J. Norton

  • Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being.

    Aaron C. Weidman;Katya C. Fernandez;Cheri A. Levinson;Adam A Augustine

  • Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.

    Thomas L Rodebaugh;Rachel B Scullin;Julia K Langer;David J Dixon

  • Social anxiety and eating disorder comorbidity: the role of negative social evaluation fears.

    Cheri A. Levinson;Thomas L. Rodebaugh

  • D-Cycloserine Augmentation of Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.

    David Mataix-Cols;Lorena Fernández de la Cruz;Benedetta Monzani;David Rosenfield

  • The factor structure and screening utility of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale.

    Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Carol M. Woods;Richard G. Heimberg;Michael R. Liebowitz

  • Does centrality in a cross-sectional network suggest intervention targets for social anxiety disorder?

    Thomas L Rodebaugh;Natasha A Tonge;Marilyn L Piccirillo;Eiko Fried

  • Social appearance anxiety, perfectionism, and fear of negative evaluation: distinct or shared risk factors for social anxiety and eating disorders?

    Cheri A. Levinson;Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Emily K. White;Andrew R. Menatti

  • More reasons to be straightforward: findings and norms for two scales relevant to social anxiety.

    Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Richard G. Heimberg;Patrick J. Brown;Katya C. Fernandez

  • Fear and avoidance of eye contact in social anxiety disorder

    Franklin R. Schneier;Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Carlos Blanco;Hillary Lewin

  • Facebook: Social uses and anxiety

    Bethany McCord;Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Cheri A. Levinson

  • Social anxiety and eating disorder comorbidity and underlying vulnerabilities: Using network analysis to conceptualize comorbidity.

    Cheri A. Levinson;Leigh C. Brosof;Irina Vanzhula;Caroline Christian

  • Social anxiety and the Big Five personality traits: the interactive relationship of trust and openness.

    Simona C Kaplan;Cheri A Levinson;Thomas L Rodebaugh;Andrew Menatti

  • Foundations of idiographic methods in psychology and applications for psychotherapy.

    Marilyn L. Piccirillo;Thomas L. Rodebaugh

  • Social phobia and perceived friendship quality.

    Thomas L. Rodebaugh

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Heimberg
Richard G. Heimberg Temple University
Justin W. Weeks
Justin W. Weeks University of Nebraska Medical Center
Dianne L. Chambless
Dianne L. Chambless University of Pennsylvania
Franklin R. Schneier
Franklin R. Schneier Columbia University
Michael R. Liebowitz
Michael R. Liebowitz Columbia University
Carol M. Woods
Carol M. Woods University of Kansas
Robert W. Gereau
Robert W. Gereau Washington University in St. Louis
Colin A. Depp
Colin A. Depp University of California, San Diego
Julie Loebach Wetherell
Julie Loebach Wetherell University of California, San Diego
David A. Moscovitch
David A. Moscovitch University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in psychology, there are numerous online degrees and fast-track options tailored to those who want to launch their careers quickly. Many students are exploring the fastest ways to become professional counselors, with each state offering unique educational pathways and licensing requirements.

Several states now provide accelerated or streamlined programs for prospective counselors. For example, those interested in the counseling field can review the Nevada fastest counseling programs to understand how quickly they can transition from studying to practicing. If you're closer to New England, investigating the quickest path to becoming a counselor in New Hampshire could be a smart move.

Other popular options include the New Jersey accelerated counseling programs and insights into New Mexico accelerated counseling programs. These programs often feature online coursework, shorter duration, and practical experience to help you meet state requirements efficiently.

As the field of psychology continues to evolve, flexible online degrees and accelerated career pathways offer both convenience and speed for students eager to begin making a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas L. Rodebaugh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles