World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
13248
World Ranking
5521
National Ranking
2521

Frank Seide publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Seide sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frank Seide D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Seide sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Seide is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their research work primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. Their scientific contributions cover areas such as Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Music and Audio Processing, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Domain Adaptation.

Seide has published extensively in venues like arXiv (Cornell University), Interspeech 2022, and the 2022 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT). The majority of their publications appear on arXiv, which accounts for a dozen research papers.

Their recent papers include:

  • Speech ReaLLM -- Real-time Streaming Speech Recognition with Multimodal LLMs by Teaching the Flow of Time, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Directional Source Separation for Robust Speech Recognition on Smart Glasses, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • DISGO: Automatic End-to-End Evaluation for Scene Text OCR, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • An Investigation of Monotonic Transducers for Large-Scale Automatic Speech Recognition, 2023, 2022 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT)
  • Federated Domain Adaptation for ASR with Full Self-Supervision, 2022, Interspeech 2022

Seide's research topics highlight a concentration on Speech and Audio Processing, including specialized areas such as Speech and Dialogue Systems and Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques. They also engage with contemporary challenges in Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning.

Frequent collaborators in their work include Jay Mahadeokar, Ozlem Kalinli, Christian Fuegen, Junteng Jia, and Niko Moritz, with cooperative publication counts ranging from four to six joint papers per coauthor.

Their research output reflects ongoing contributions to advancing techniques in speech recognition and audio processing, particularly in large-scale and noisy environments. The combination of theoretical and applied research in automatic speech recognition and multimodal language models underscores the breadth and depth of their work.

Best Publications

  • Conversational Speech Transcription Using Context-Dependent Deep Neural Networks.

    Frank Seide;Gang Li;Dong Yu

  • Recent advances in deep learning for speech research at Microsoft

    Li Deng;Jinyu Li;Jui-Ting Huang;Kaisheng Yao

  • 1-bit stochastic gradient descent and its application to data-parallel distributed training of speech DNNs.

    Frank Seide;Hao Fu;Jasha Droppo;Gang Li

  • Feature engineering in Context-Dependent Deep Neural Networks for conversational speech transcription

    Frank Seide;Gang Li;Xie Chen;Dong Yu

  • Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translation

    Hany Hassan;Anthony Aue;Chang Chen;Vishal Chowdhary

  • Achieving Human Parity in Conversational Speech Recognition

    Wayne Xiong;Jasha Droppo;Xuedong Huang;Frank Seide

  • Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++

    Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt;Roman Grundkiewicz;Tomasz Dwojak;Hieu Hoang

  • CNTK: Microsoft's Open-Source Deep-Learning Toolkit

    Frank Seide;Amit Agarwal

  • KL-divergence regularized deep neural network adaptation for improved large vocabulary speech recognition

    Dong Yu;Kaisheng Yao;Hang Su;Gang Li

  • An Introduction to Computational Networks and the Computational Network Toolkit

    Dong Yu;Adam Eversole;Mike Seltzer;Kaisheng Yao

  • The Philips automatic train timetable information system

    Harald Aust;Martin Oerder;Frank Seide;Volker Steinbiss

  • The microsoft 2016 conversational speech recognition system

    W. Xiong;J. Droppo;X. Huang;F. Seide

  • Adaptation of context-dependent deep neural networks for automatic speech recognition

    Kaisheng Yao;Dong Yu;Frank Seide;Hang Su

  • Feature Learning in Deep Neural Networks - Studies on Speech Recognition Tasks

    Dong Yu;Michael L. Seltzer;Jinyu Li;Jui-Ting Huang

  • Toward Human Parity in Conversational Speech Recognition

    Wayne Xiong;Jasha Droppo;Xuedong Huang;Frank Seide

  • Internet search-based television

    Frank T. B. Seide;Lie Lu;Neema M. Moraveji;Roger Peng Yu

  • Improving speech understanding by incorporating database constraints and dialogue history

    F. Seide;B. Rueber;A. Kellner

  • Exploiting sparseness in deep neural networks for large vocabulary speech recognition

    Dong Yu;Frank Seide;Gang Li;Li Deng

  • Error back propagation for sequence training of Context-Dependent Deep NetworkS for conversational speech transcription

    Hang Su;Gang Li;Dong Yu;Frank Seide

  • Conversational speech transcription using context-dependent deep neural networks

    Dong Yu;Frank Seide;Gang Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Dong Yu
Dong Yu Tencent (China)
Li Deng
Li Deng Citadel
Lie Lu
Lie Lu Dolby (United States)
Xuedong Huang
Xuedong Huang Microsoft (United States)
Michael L. Seltzer
Michael L. Seltzer Facebook (United States)
Jasha Droppo
Jasha Droppo Amazon (United States)
Alejandro Acero
Alejandro Acero Apple (United States)
Eric Chang
Eric Chang Microsoft (United States)
Jinyu Li
Jinyu Li Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Computer Science can open the door to many diverse career paths. Prospective students often seek flexible programs to match their personal and professional commitments. Choosing the cheapest bachelor's degree online is a practical way to reduce student debt while still gaining essential skills for technology careers.

For those interested in specialized technical fields, many reputable institutions offer engineering online programs that provide foundational and advanced knowledge in fields such as software engineering, electrical engineering, and more.

Professionals aiming for leadership positions may pursue affordable emba programs to combine their technical abilities with management expertise. This can lead to high-level roles within the tech industry or related business sectors.

Additionally, those interested in information organization and research can explore the value of an online library degree, which offers pathways into digital archiving, knowledge management, and library science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Seide

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles