World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Locht Michelsen

Michael Locht Michelsen

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
14995
World Ranking
7667
National Ranking
64

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
67
Citations
16141
World Ranking
1311
National Ranking
19

Michael Locht Michelsen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Locht Michelsen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 204 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Michael Locht Michelsen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Locht Michelsen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Locht Michelsen is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark in Denmark. Their research spans multiple scientific disciplines, including biomedical engineering, fluid flow and transfer processes, and organic chemistry.

Their work focuses significantly on phase equilibria and thermodynamics, thermodynamic properties of mixtures, and chemical thermodynamics and molecular structure. These topics are central to their research output and establish the thematic consistency in their publications.

Michael Locht Michelsen has contributed to the academic community with at least two recent papers. These include:

  • Matching the critical point of associating fluids with the Cubic Plus Association equation of state (2020, Fluid Phase Equilibria)
  • Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving (2025, arXiv (Cornell University))

The scientist collaborates with several frequent co-authors, indicating active research partnerships. These co-authors include:

  • Xiaodong Liang
  • Baoliang Peng
  • Yuan Chen
  • Jianhui Luo
  • Georgios M. Kontogeorgis

Michael Locht Michelsen's papers have appeared in known venues such as Fluid Phase Equilibria and arXiv (Cornell University). This reflects engagement with both peer-reviewed journals and preprint archives, capturing an array of scientific communication formats.

Best Publications

  • The isothermal flash problem. Part I. Stability

    Michael L. Michelsen

  • The isothermal flash problem. Part II. Phase-split calculation

    Michael L. Michelsen

  • Thermodynamic Modelling: Fundamentals and Computational Aspects

    Michael Locht Michelsen;Jørgen Mollerup

  • A modified Huron-Vidal mixing rule for cubic equations of state

    Michael L. Michelsen

  • Ten Years with the CPA (Cubic-Plus-Association) Equation of State. Part 1. Pure Compounds and Self-Associating Systems

    Georgios Kontogeorgis;Michael Locht Michelsen;Georgios Folas;Samer Derawi

  • High-pressure vapor-liquid equilibrium with a UNIFAC-based equation of state

    Søren Dahl;Michael L. Michelsen

  • A Flory–Huggins model based on the Hansen solubility parameters

    Thomas Lindvig;Michael Locht Michelsen;Georgios Kontogeorgis

  • Computerized Design of Multicomponent Distillation Columns Using the UNIFAC Group Contribution Method for Calculation of Activity Coefficients

    Aage Fredenslund;Jurgen Gmehling;Michael L. Michelsen;Peter Rasmussen

  • Computational and physical performance of a modified PC-SAFT equation of state for highly asymmetric and associating mixtures

    Nicolas von Solms;Michael Locht Michelsen;Georgios Kontogeorgis

  • The negative flash

    Curtis H. Whitson;Michael L. Michelsen

  • Calculation of phase envelopes and critical points for multicomponent mixtures

    Michael L. Michelsen

  • Ten Years with the CPA (Cubic-Plus-Association) Equation of State. Part 2. Cross-Associating and Multicomponent Systems

    Georgios Kontogeorgis;Michael Locht Michelsen;Georgios Folas;Samer Derawi

  • A method for incorporating excess Gibbs energy models in equations of state

    Michael L. Michelsen

  • Physical properties from association models

    Michael Locht Michelsen;Eric M. Hendriks

  • Experimental investigation and modeling of a wet flue gas desulfurization pilot plant

    Søren Kiil;Michael L. Michelsen;Kim Dam-Johansen

  • Modeling phase equilibria for acid gas mixtures using the CPA equation of state. Part II: Binary mixtures with CO2

    Ioannis Tsivintzelis;Georgios M. Kontogeorgis;Michael L. Michelsen;Erling H. Stenby

  • A Predictive Group-Contribution Simplified PC-SAFT Equation of State: Application to Polymer Systems

    Amra Tihic;Georgios M. Kontogeorgis;Nicolas von Solms;Michael L. Michelsen

  • A model for estimating CO2 solubility in aqueous alkanolamines

    Jostein Gabrielsen;Michael Locht Michelsen;Erling Halfdan Stenby;Georgios Kontogeorgis

  • Simplified flash calculations for Cubic Equations of State

    Michael L. Michelsen

  • On composition-dependent interaction coefficeints

    Michael L. Michelsen;Hans Kistenmacher

  • A Flory-Huggins model based on the Hansen solubility parameters for paint-related applications

    Georgios Kontogeorgis;Thomas Lindvig;Michael Locht Michelsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Georgios M. Kontogeorgis
Georgios M. Kontogeorgis Technical University of Denmark
Erling Halfdan Stenby
Erling Halfdan Stenby Technical University of Denmark
Nicolas von Solms
Nicolas von Solms Technical University of Denmark
Rafiqul Gani
Rafiqul Gani Széchenyi István University
Lars Bogø Jensen
Lars Bogø Jensen Technical University of Denmark
Anker Degn Jensen
Anker Degn Jensen Technical University of Denmark
Ioannis G. Economou
Ioannis G. Economou Texas A&M University at Qatar
Kaj Thomsen
Kaj Thomsen Technical University of Denmark
Kim Dam-Johansen
Kim Dam-Johansen Technical University of Denmark
Lisbeth Olsson
Lisbeth Olsson Chalmers University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael Locht Michelsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles