World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 46 5240 5048 60 59 246 7142

Nicolas von Solms publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicolas von Solms between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicolas von Solms published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 19 of the 276 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 7 publications
2000 2025

276 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicolas von Solms: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 6
2004 5
2005 4
2006 9
2007 13
2008 10
2009 11
2010 9
2011 5
2012 7
2013 14
2014 19
2015 8
2016 13
2017 15
2018 11
2019 15
2020 21
2021 23
2022 22
2023 15
2024 12
2025 7
Total 276
Download as CSV

Nicolas von Solms publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas von Solms sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 238–247 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 246 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260 246
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicolas von Solms D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas von Solms sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301 46
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicolas von Solms is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark in Denmark. The scientist's research primarily focuses on various aspects of engineering and environmental science, producing a substantial body of work in these fields.

The main fields of study associated with their research include:

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science

Further specialization is evident in several subfields of study, which include:

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Environmental Engineering

The research topics covered by Nicolas von Solms encompass a wide range of themes related to energy and environmental systems. Key topics of their work are:

  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Thermodynamic Properties of Mixtures

Some recent papers from this scientist illustrate the breadth of their expertise. Selected publications include:

  • "The Effect of Concentration of Lithium Salt on the Structural and Transport Properties of Ionic Liquid-Based Electrolytes," 2020, Frontiers in Chemistry
  • "Screening of Amino Acids and Surfactant as Hydrate Promoter for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas," 2020, Processes
  • "Enhanced CH4-CO2 Hydrate Swapping in the Presence of Low Dosage Methanol," 2020, Energies
  • "A Review of Electrolyte Equations of State with Emphasis on Those Based on Cubic and Cubic-Plus-Association (CPA) Models," 2022, International Journal of Thermophysics
  • "Analysis of Some Electrolyte Models Including Their Ability to Predict the Activity Coefficients of Individual Ions," 2020, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

The scientist's work appears frequently in certain publication venues, demonstrating areas of concentrated research output. Notable venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal (12 publications)
  • Fluid Phase Equilibria (10 publications)
  • Energies (7 publications)
  • Chemical Engineering Journal (5 publications)
  • Energy & Fuels (5 publications)

Nicolas von Solms collaborates regularly with multiple researchers, highlighting a network of frequent co-authors. These include:

  • Jyoti Shanker Pandey (25 collaborations)
  • Xiaodong Liang (21 collaborations)
  • Philip Loldrup Fosbøl (18 collaborations)
  • Georgios M. Kontogeorgis (18 collaborations)
  • Qian Ouyang (10 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Ten Years with the CPA (Cubic-Plus-Association) Equation of State. Part 1. Pure Compounds and Self-Associating Systems

    Georgios Kontogeorgis;Michael Locht Michelsen;Georgios Folas;Samer Derawi

  • Computational and physical performance of a modified PC-SAFT equation of state for highly asymmetric and associating mixtures

    Nicolas von Solms;Michael Locht Michelsen;Georgios Kontogeorgis

  • Ten Years with the CPA (Cubic-Plus-Association) Equation of State. Part 2. Cross-Associating and Multicomponent Systems

    Georgios Kontogeorgis;Michael Locht Michelsen;Georgios Folas;Samer Derawi

  • A Predictive Group-Contribution Simplified PC-SAFT Equation of State: Application to Polymer Systems

    Amra Tihic;Georgios M. Kontogeorgis;Nicolas von Solms;Michael L. Michelsen

  • Application of various water soluble polymers in gas hydrate inhibition

    Muhammad Shahzad Kamal;Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein;Abdullah S. Sultan;Nicolas von Solms

  • Applications of the simplified perturbed-chain SAFT equation of state using an extended parameter table

    Amra Tihic;Georgios Kontogeorgis;Nicolas von Solms;Michael Locht Michelsen

  • Calculation of liquid water-hydrate-methane vapor phase equilibria from molecular simulations.

    Lars Jensen;Kaj Thomsen;Nicolas von Solms;Scott Wierzchowski

  • Synergistic kinetic inhibition of natural gas hydrate formation

    Nagu Daraboina;Christine Malmos;Nicolas von Solms

  • Efficient transformation of CO2 to cyclic carbonates using bifunctional protic ionic liquids under mild conditions

    Xianglei Meng;Xianglei Meng;Zhaoyang Ju;Suojiang Zhang;Xiaodong Liang

  • Natural gas hydrate formation and inhibition in gas/crude oil/aqueous systems

    Nagu Daraboina;Stylianos Pachitsas;Nicolas von Solms

  • Inhibition of Gas Hydrate Nucleation and Growth: Efficacy of an Antifreeze Protein from the Longhorn Beetle Rhagium mordax

    Christine Malmos Perfeldt;Pei Cheng Chua;Nagu Daraboina;Dennis Friis

  • Equilibrium Total Pressure and CO2 Solubility in Binary and Ternary Aqueous Solutions of 2-(Diethylamino)ethanol (DEEA) and 3-(Methylamino)propylamine (MAPA)

    Muhammad Waseem Arshad;Hallvard Fjøsne Svendsen;Philip Loldrup Fosbøl;Nicolas von Solms

  • Modeling phase equilibria of alkanols with the simplified PC-SAFT equation of state and generalized pure compound parameters

    Andreas Grenner;Georgios Kontogeorgis;Nicolas von Solms;Michael Locht Michelsen

  • Propane hydrate nucleation : Experimental investigation and correlation

    Lars Jensen;Kaj Thomsen;Nicolas von Solms

  • Inhibition of Structure I and II Gas Hydrates using Synthetic and Biological Kinetic Inhibitors

    Lars Jensen;Kaj Thomsen;Nicolas von Solms

  • Comparison of Two Association Models (Elliott-Suresh-Donohue and Simplified PC-SAFT) for Complex Phase Equilibria of Hydrocarbon-Water and Amine-Containing Mixtures

    Andreas Grenner;Jürgen Schmelzer;Nicolas Von Solms;Georgios M. Kontogeorgis

  • The effect of concentration of lithium salt on the structural and transport properties of ionic liquid-based electrolytes

    Jiahuan Tong;Jiahuan Tong;Shengli Wu;Nicolas von Solms;Xiaodong Liang

  • Experimental validation of kinetic inhibitor strength on natural gas hydrate nucleation

    Nagu Daraboina;Stylianos Pachitsas;Nicolas von Solms

  • Modeling of Asphaltene Onset Precipitation Conditions with Cubic Plus Association (CPA) and Perturbed Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (PC-SAFT) Equations of State

    Alay Arya;Xiaodong Liang;Nicolas von Solms;Georgios M. Kontogeorgis

  • Efficient ionic liquid-based platform for multi-enzymatic conversion of carbon dioxide to methanol

    Zhibo Zhang;Jan Muschiol;Yuhong Huang;Sigyn Björk Sigurdardóttir

  • Application of the perturbed chain SAFT equation of state to complex polymer systems using simplified mixing rules

    Irene A Kouskoumvekaki;Nicolas von Solms;Michael L Michelsen;Georgios M Kontogeorgis

  • Investigating Models for Associating Fluids Using Spectroscopy

    Nicolas Von Solms;Michael L. Michelsen;Claudia Pereira Passos;Samer O. Derawi

Frequent Co-Authors

Georgios M. Kontogeorgis
Georgios M. Kontogeorgis Technical University of Denmark
Kaj Thomsen
Kaj Thomsen Technical University of Denmark
Michael Locht Michelsen
Michael Locht Michelsen Technical University of Denmark
Erling Halfdan Stenby
Erling Halfdan Stenby Technical University of Denmark
John M. Woodley
John M. Woodley Technical University of Denmark
Lars Bogø Jensen
Lars Bogø Jensen Technical University of Denmark
Krist V. Gernaey
Krist V. Gernaey Technical University of Denmark
Suojiang Zhang
Suojiang Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Rafiqul Gani
Rafiqul Gani Széchenyi István University
Hallvard F. Svendsen
Hallvard F. Svendsen Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Engineering and Technology can open doors to flexible, career-focused pathways. For those interested in designing and managing smart cities, a masters in urban planning online is an excellent way to combine technology and urban development, often while balancing work or family commitments.

If you’re looking to upskill quickly, consider a 6 month master's degree online. These accelerated programs allow tech professionals to gain advanced knowledge in a short period, helping you stay competitive in fast-changing fields.

Not all career advancement requires a full degree. Focused certificate programs that pay well can lead directly to high-demand tech roles, offering a cost-effective and efficient route into specialized areas.

Online learning is also ideal for those managing family responsibilities. The best online degrees for moms provide the flexibility needed to balance education, career, and home life—empowering more people to pursue rewarding pathways in Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Nicolas von Solms

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles