World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
9657
World Ranking
8733
National Ranking
4648

William T. Hoyt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William T. Hoyt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William T. Hoyt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William T. Hoyt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

William T. Hoyt is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and medicine, with a focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, reproductive medicine, pathology, forensic medicine, and rehabilitation.

Hoyt's work concentrates on key topics such as:

  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Their recent publications include:

  • "Cultural context matters: Testing the minority stress model among Chinese sexual minority men." (2020, Journal of Counseling Psychology)
  • "Longitudinal effects of psychotherapy with transgender and nonbinary clients: A randomized controlled pilot trial." (2020, Psychotherapy)
  • "Evaluating Optimism, Hope, Resilience, Coping Flexibility, Secure Attachment, and PERMA as a Well-Being Model for College Life Adjustment of Student Veterans: A Hierarchical Regression Analysis" (2022, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin)
  • "Exploration of the Effects of Protective Person-Environment Factors Between Functional Impairments and Stress in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: Mediation and Moderation Analyses" (2021, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin)
  • "The role of mindfulness in quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study" (2022, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes)

Frequently, Hoyt collaborates with other researchers including:

  • Timothy N. Tansey
  • Morgan T. Sinnard
  • Fong Chan
  • Norman L. Berven
  • Malachy Bishop

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Psychotherapy
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

William T. Hoyt's research covers a broad scope, merging applied clinical approaches with social and medical dimensions of psychology. The integration of minority stress models, well-being frameworks, and protective environmental factors reflects an interest in understanding resilience and mental health across diverse populations and rehabilitation contexts.

In 2016, Hoyt was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Religious Involvement and Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Michael E. McCullough;William T. Hoyt;William T. Hoyt;David B. Larson;Harold G. Koenig

  • Mindfulness Interventions with Youth: A Meta-Analysis

    Sarah Zoogman;Simon B. Goldberg;William T. Hoyt;Lisa Miller

  • Promoting self-regulation through school-based martial arts training

    Kimberley D Lakes;William T Hoyt

  • Transgression-Related Motivational Dispositions: Personality Substrates of Forgiveness and their Links to the Big Five:

    Michael E. McCullough;William T. Hoyt

  • Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness: a meta-analysis.

    Nathaniel G. Wade;William T. Hoyt;Julia E. M. Kidwell;Everett L. Worthington Jr.

  • Rater bias in psychological research: when is it a problem and what can we do about it?

    William T. Hoyt

  • Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis of outcomes in a clinical setting.

    Simon B. Goldberg;Tony Rousmaniere;Scott D. Miller;Jason Whipple

  • Psychometric and Rationalization Accounts of the Religion‐Forgiveness Discrepancy

    Jo Ann Tsang;Michael E. McCullough;William T. Hoyt

  • Between a Gay and a Straight Place: Bisexual Individuals’ Experiences with Monosexism

    Tangela S. Roberts;Sharon G. Horne;William T. Hoyt

  • What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs.

    Michael E. McCullough;William T. Hoyt;K. Chris Rachal

  • Magnitude and moderators of bias in observer ratings: A meta-analysis.

    William T. Hoyt;Michael-David Kerns

  • Effectiveness of grief therapy: A meta-analysis.

    Denise Litterer Allumbaugh;William T. Hoyt

  • Multiple regression and correlation techniques: Recent controversies and best practices.

    William T. Hoyt;Zac E. Imel;Fong Chan

  • Responses to interpersonal transgressions in families : Forgivingness, forgivability, and relationship-specific effects

    William T. Hoyt;Frank D. Fincham;Michael E. McCullough;Gregory Richard Maio

  • Analysis and Interpretation of Findings Using Multiple Regression Techniques.

    William T. Hoyt;Stephen Leierer;Michael J. Millington

  • What has become of grief counseling? An evaluation of the empirical foundations of the new pessimism.

    Dale G. Larson;William T. Hoyt

  • Self-Concealment: Integrative Review and Working Model

    Dale G. Larson;Robert L. Chastain;William T. Hoyt;Ruthie Ayzenberg

  • Unique effects and moderators of effects of sources on self-efficacy: A model-based meta-analysis.

    Angela Byars-Winston;Jacob Diestelmann;Julia N. Savoy;William T. Hoyt

  • Construct Validation in Counseling Psychology Research

    William T. Hoyt;Rosalia E. Warbasse;Erica Y. Chu

  • Creating a climate for therapist improvement: A case study of an agency focused on outcomes and deliberate practice.

    Simon B. Goldberg;Robbie Babins-Wagner;Tony Rousmaniere;Sandy Berzins

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon B. Goldberg
Simon B. Goldberg University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael E. McCullough
Michael E. McCullough University of California, San Diego
Bruce E. Wampold
Bruce E. Wampold University of Wisconsin–Madison
Everett L. Worthington
Everett L. Worthington Virginia Commonwealth University
Nathaniel G. Wade
Nathaniel G. Wade Iowa State University
Fong Chan
Fong Chan University of Wisconsin–Madison
Christoph Flückiger
Christoph Flückiger University of Kassel
David A. Kenny
David A. Kenny Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
John E. Pachankis
John E. Pachankis Yale University
Raymond P. Tucker
Raymond P. Tucker Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a broad spectrum of career possibilities, both at entry and advanced levels. Students can explore entry level child psychology jobs, including positions in schools, community centers, or social service agencies, often helping support children and families from diverse backgrounds.

For those interested in understanding mental processes, there are growing opportunities related to careers in cognitive psychology. These roles often involve conducting research, working in healthcare, or supporting tech companies with cognitive product development.

Another popular direction is counseling. Many wonder, where do counseling psychologists work? The answer is varied—counseling psychologists find roles in private practices, hospitals, academic institutions, and community organizations.

It's also important to understand key professional distinctions in the field. The guide on counselor vs psychologist explains the differences in education, licensing requirements, and career scope to help you find the best path forward.

Best Scientists Citing William T. Hoyt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles