World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Todd J. Suscovich

Todd J. Suscovich

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 43 5215 4816 1992 1790 80 9182

Todd J. Suscovich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Todd J. Suscovich between 2000 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Todd J. Suscovich published across 24 years, from 2000 to 2023, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2020. 3 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2020. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication
2000 2023

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Todd J. Suscovich: publications per year, 2000 to 2023
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 3
2005 5
2006 1
2007 4
2008 3
2009 0
2010 0
2011 1
2012 1
2013 1
2014 6
2015 4
2016 8
2017 5
2018 8
2019 8
2020 10
2021 5
2022 2
2023 1
Total 80
Download as CSV

Todd J. Suscovich publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd J. Suscovich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 75–84 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 80 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55 80
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Todd J. Suscovich D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd J. Suscovich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117 43
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Todd J. Suscovich is affiliated with SeromYx Systems in the United States and has contributed to the fields of Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology. Their research focuses notably on Infectious Diseases, Immunology, Virology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's primary research topics include SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research, HIV Research and Treatment, T-cell and B-cell Immunology, Complement system in diseases, and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Immunity
  • Science Translational Medicine
  • Cell Reports
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Todd J. Suscovich are:

  • Mapping functional humoral correlates of protection against malaria challenge following RTS,S/AS01 vaccination, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Distinct Early Serological Signatures Track with SARS-CoV-2 Survival, 2020, Immunity
  • Immunogenicity of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Pregnant and Lactating Women, 2021, JAMA
  • mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines elicit antibodies with differences in Fc-mediated effector functions, 2022, Science Translational Medicine
  • Integrated pipeline for the accelerated discovery of antiviral antibody therapeutics, 2020, Nature Biomedical Engineering

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Galit Alter
  • Caitlyn Linde
  • Douglas A. Lauffenburger
  • Dan H. Barouch
  • Thomas Broge

Best Publications

  • Beyond binding: antibody effector functions in infectious diseases.

    Lenette L. Lu;Todd J. Suscovich;Sarah M. Fortune;Galit Alter

  • A Functional Role for Antibodies in Tuberculosis

    Lenette L. Lu;Lenette L. Lu;Amy W. Chung;Amy W. Chung;Tracy R. Rosebrock;Musie Ghebremichael

  • Differential natural killer cell–mediated inhibition of HIV-1 replication based on distinct KIR/HLA subtypes

    Galit Alter;Maureen P. Martin;Nickolas Teigen;William H Carr

  • Polyfunctional Fc-Effector Profiles Mediated by IgG Subclass Selection Distinguish RV144 and VAX003 Vaccines

    Amy W. Chung;Musie Ghebremichael;Hannah Robinson;Eric Brown

  • Sequential deregulation of NK cell subset distribution and function starting in acute HIV-1 infection

    Galit Alter;Nickolas Teigen;Benjamin T. Davis;Marylyn M. Addo

  • Distinct Early Serological Signatures Track with SARS-CoV-2 Survival.

    Caroline Atyeo;Caroline Atyeo;Stephanie Fischinger;Stephanie Fischinger;Tomer Zohar;Tomer Zohar;Matthew D. Slein

  • Immunogenicity of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Pregnant and Lactating Women.

    Ai-Ris Y Collier;Ai-Ris Y Collier;Katherine McMahan;Jingyou Yu;Lisa H Tostanoski

  • Dissecting Polyclonal Vaccine-Induced Humoral Immunity against HIV Using Systems Serology.

    Amy W. Chung;Amy W. Chung;Manu P. Kumar;Kelly B. Arnold;Wen Han Yu;Wen Han Yu

  • IFN-γ-independent immune markers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure.

    Lenette L. Lu;Lenette L. Lu;Malisa T. Smith;Krystle K. Q. Yu;Corinne Luedemann

  • Polyfunctional HIV-Specific Antibody Responses Are Associated with Spontaneous HIV Control

    Margaret E. Ackerman;Anastassia Mikhailova;Eric P. Brown;Karen G. Dowell

  • A Role for Fc Function in Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody-Mediated Protection against Ebola Virus.

    Bronwyn M. Gunn;Wen Han Yu;Marcus M. Karim;Jennifer M. Brannan

  • mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines elicit antibodies with differences in Fc-mediated effector functions

    Unknown

  • Persistent Recognition of Autologous Virus by High-Avidity CD8 T Cells in Chronic, Progressive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection

    R. Draenert;C. L. Verrill;Y. Tang;T. M. Allen

  • A high-throughput, bead-based, antigen-specific assay to assess the ability of antibodies to induce complement activation.

    Stephanie Fischinger;Jonathan K. Fallon;Ashlin R. Michell;Thomas Broge

  • Fc Glycan-Mediated Regulation of Placental Antibody Transfer

    Madeleine F Jennewein;Ilona Goldfarb;Sepideh Dolatshahi;Sepideh Dolatshahi;Cormac Cosgrove

  • A versatile high-throughput assay to characterize antibody-mediated neutrophil phagocytosis.

    Christina B. Karsten;Nickita Mehta;Sally A. Shin;Thomas J. Diefenbach

  • Structural and Functional Constraints Limit Options for Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Escape in the Immunodominant HLA-B27-Restricted Epitope in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Capsid

    Arne Schneidewind;Mark A. Brockman;Mark A. Brockman;John Sidney;Yaoyu E. Wang

  • Extensive HLA class I allele promiscuity among viral CTL epitopes

    Nicole Frahm;Karina Yusim;Todd J. Suscovich;Sharon Adams

  • Single-Stranded RNA Derived from HIV-1 Serves as a Potent Activator of NK Cells

    Galit Alter;Todd J. Suscovich;Nickolas Teigen;Angela Meier

  • Route of immunization defines multiple mechanisms of vaccine-mediated protection against SIV

    Margaret E. Ackerman;Jishnu Das;Srivamshi Pittala;Thomas Broge

  • Pentavalent HIV-1 vaccine protects against simian-human immunodeficiency virus challenge

    Todd Bradley;Justin Pollara;Sampa Santra;Nathan Vandergrift

  • Antigen-Specific Antibody Glycosylation Is Regulated via Vaccination

    Alison E. Mahan;Madeleine F. Jennewein;Todd Suscovich;Kendall Dionne

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan H. Barouch
Dan H. Barouch Harvard Medical School
Margaret E. Ackerman
Margaret E. Ackerman Dartmouth College
Bruce D. Walker
Bruce D. Walker Harvard University
Hendrik Streeck
Hendrik Streeck University Hospital Bonn
Kristian G. Andersen
Kristian G. Andersen Scripps Research Institute
Sarah M. Fortune
Sarah M. Fortune Harvard University
Marcus Altfeld
Marcus Altfeld University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Philip L. De Jager
Philip L. De Jager Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to diverse healthcare and research careers. For students interested in expanding their qualifications online, exploring the best online health information management degree cahiim accredited programs can offer specialized knowledge in managing healthcare data and improving patient outcomes.

Those looking for quicker entry into the healthcare sector may consider the fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs. These certificates provide essential skills for managing medical records and billing processes, complementing scientific backgrounds such as microbiology.

The healthcare field also includes a broad spectrum of options, and prospective students should review various online healthcare programs to find the best fit for their career goals. Microbiology graduates can often bridge into health administration, research, or clinical roles through these pathways.

Additionally, advanced degrees like public health can enhance career prospects. Exploring accredited online mph programs easy to get into makes it accessible for many microbiology students aiming to influence health policy and community health initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Todd J. Suscovich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles