World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4671 4320 796 737 237 9147

Priscilla Alderson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Priscilla Alderson between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Priscilla Alderson published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2002. 4 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2002. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1981 2025

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Priscilla Alderson: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 4
1991 4
1992 9
1993 7
1994 6
1995 9
1996 10
1997 4
1998 15
1999 11
2000 7
2001 9
2002 18
2003 4
2004 12
2005 9
2006 9
2007 5
2008 5
2009 3
2010 5
2011 15
2012 3
2013 1
2014 1
2015 5
2016 9
2017 8
2018 7
2019 4
2020 3
2021 12
2022 7
2023 15
2024 1
2025 3
Total 266
Download as CSV

Priscilla Alderson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Priscilla Alderson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 234–243 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 237 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170 237
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Priscilla Alderson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Priscilla Alderson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Priscilla Alderson is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their work spans fields primarily within Social Sciences and Medicine, with a particular focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Clinical Psychology.

The research of Priscilla Alderson covers several main topics, including:

  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Critical Realism in Sociology
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Religious Education and Schools
  • Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies

Priscilla Alderson has published regularly in the following venues:

  • Journal of Critical Realism
  • Clinical Ethics
  • London Review of Education
  • Nursing Ethics
  • Journal of Child Health Care

Recent papers include:

  • "Realist by inclination, childhood studies, dialectic and bodily concerns: an interview with Priscilla Alderson" (2022, Journal of Critical Realism)
  • "Health, illness and neoliberalism: an example of critical realism as a research resource" (2021, Journal of Critical Realism)
  • "Children's informed signified and voluntary consent to heart surgery: Professionals' practical perspectives" (2022, Nursing Ethics)
  • "Bodily integrity and autonomy of the youngest children and consent to their healthcare" (2023, Clinical Ethics)
  • "Living bioethics, clinical ethics committees and children's consent to heart surgery" (2021, Clinical Ethics)

Collaborations have frequently involved the following researchers:

  • Rosa Maria Mendizabal-Espinosa
  • Katy Sutcliffe
  • Hugo Wellesley
  • Hannah Bellsham-Revell
  • Joe Brierley

In terms of book publications, Priscilla Alderson has contributed to works primarily published by Policy Press and Bristol University Press eBooks. These include multiple editions of "Critical Realism for Health and Illness Research," published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook

    Priscilla Alderson;Virginia Morrow

  • Ethics, Social Research and Consulting with Children and Young People

    Priscilla Alderson;Virginia Morrow

  • Health Care Choices: Making Decisions with Children

    Priscilla Alderson;J Montgomery

  • Competent children? Minors' consent to health care treatment and research.

    Priscilla Alderson

  • Listening to Children : Children, Ethics and Social Research

    Priscilla Alderson

  • Young Children's Rights : exploring beliefs, principles and practice

    Priscilla Alderson

  • Children's consent to surgery

    Priscilla Alderson

  • Research by Children

    Priscilla Alderson

  • 'Drawing the line' in prenatal screening and testing: Health practitioners' discussions

    Clare Williams;Priscilla Alderson;Bobbie Farsides

  • Designing ethical research with children

    Priscilla Alderson

  • Children as partners with adults in their medical care

    Priscilla Alderson;Katy Sutcliffe;Katherine Curtis

  • Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing

    Clare Williams;Priscilla Alderson;Bobbie Farsides

  • The importance of theories in health care

    Priscilla Alderson

  • School Students' Views on School Councils and Daily Life at School.

    Priscilla Alderson

  • Children as Researchers: Participation Rights and Research Methods

    Unknown

  • Children’s competence to consent to medical treatment

    Priscilla Alderson;Katy Sutcliffe;Katherine Curtis

  • In the genes or in the stars? Children's competence to consent.

    Priscilla Alderson

  • Down's syndrome: cost, quality and value of life.

    Priscilla Alderson

  • What constitutes 'balanced' information in the practitioners' portrayals of Down's syndrome?

    Clare Williams;Priscilla Alderson;Bobbie Farsides

  • Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening.

    Clare Williams;Priscilla Alderson;Bobbie Farsides

  • Qualitative Research in Health Care

    Priscilla Alderson

  • Health care choices: making decisions with children: summary of conclusions

    Priscilla Alderson;J Montgomery

Frequent Co-Authors

Clare Williams
Clare Williams Brunel University London
Virginia Morrow
Virginia Morrow University College London
Debby Herbenick
Debby Herbenick Indiana University
Arthur W. Frank
Arthur W. Frank University of Calgary
Saffron Karlsen
Saffron Karlsen University of Bristol
Morten Frisch
Morten Frisch Statens Serum Institut
Ronan M. Conroy
Ronan M. Conroy Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Martin J. Elliott
Martin J. Elliott University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide array of unique career opportunities. Today, more students are taking advantage of flexible learning options to earn their degrees quickly and efficiently.

For those looking to accelerate their education, exploring 1 year masters programs can be a smart move. These programs allow you to quickly gain advanced knowledge and credentials, helping you stand out in competitive job markets.

Likewise, students interested in starting their careers sooner may benefit from an accelerated bachelor's degree online. These bachelor's programs compress coursework into a shorter timeline, allowing faster graduation and earlier entry into the workforce.

For those looking to make a social impact through direct service, consider options like msw programs online. Master of Social Work programs equip graduates with the skills needed for meaningful roles in social services and advocacy.

Lastly, those interested in behavioral sciences may find opportunities with a bcba degree online. This credential can lead to careers in behavioral analysis, helping individuals and communities thrive.

Best Scientists Citing Priscilla Alderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles