World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
9146
World Ranking
6399
National Ranking
3470

David E. Sandberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Sandberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David E. Sandberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Sandberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

David E. Sandberg is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans broad areas within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with notable contributions in various subfields such as molecular biology, urology, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, social psychology, and reproductive medicine.

The scholar's work focuses on several main topics, including sexual differentiation and disorders, urological disorders and treatments, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, reproductive health and technologies, ethics and legal issues in pediatric healthcare, hormonal and reproductive studies, as well as genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities.

David E. Sandberg has contributed to multiple academic outlets. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Urology
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
  • Journal of Pediatric Urology
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Their recent papers illustrate the range of their research interests and include the following:

  • "Differences/Disorders of Sex Development: Medical Conditions at the Intersection of Sex and Gender," 2022, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • "Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia-Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management," 2021, Endocrine Reviews
  • "Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome," 2024, European Journal of Endocrinology
  • "Longitudinal associations between digital media use and ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents: a systematic literature review," 2022, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Changes in Size and Demographic Composition of Transgender and Gender Non-Binary Population Receiving Care at Integrated Health Systems," 2020, Endocrine Practice

Collaborations are a significant aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Kristina I. Suorsa-Johnson
  • Melissa Gardner
  • Peter A. Lee
  • Darios Getahun
  • Timothy L. Lash

Among professional recognitions, David E. Sandberg was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner Syndrome Meeting

    Claus H Gravholt;Niels H Andersen;Gerard S Conway;Olaf M Dekkers

  • Global Disorders of Sex Development Update since 2006: Perceptions, Approach and Care

    Peter A. Lee;Anna Nordenström;Christopher P. Houk;S. Faisal Ahmed

  • Pregnancy problems, postpartum depression, and early mother–infant interactions.

    Tiffany Field;David Sandberg;Robert Garcia;Nitza Vega-Lahr

  • Mental Health of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Youth Compared With Their Peers.

    Tracy A. Becerra-Culqui;Yuan Liu;Rebecca Nash;Lee Cromwell

  • Analgesia produced by electrical stimulation of catecholamine nuclei in the rat brain.

    Menachem Segal;David Sandberg

  • Summary of Consensus Statement on Intersex Disorders and Their Management

    Christopher P. Houk;Ieuan A. Hughes;S. Faisal Ahmed;Peter A. Lee

  • Short stature: a psychosocial burden requiring growth hormone therapy?

    David E. Sandberg;Amy E. Brook;Susana P. Campos

  • DSDs: genetics, underlying pathologies and psychosexual differentiation

    Valerie A. Arboleda;David E. Sandberg;Eric Vilain

  • Depressive and anxiety disorders in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa

    Victor Fornari;Myra Kaplan;David E. Sandberg;Michael Matthews

  • Psychological adaptation in children with idiopathic short stature treated with growth hormone or placebo.

    Judith L. Ross;Judith L. Ross;David E. Sandberg;Susan R. Rose;Ellen Werber Leschek

  • Children with disorders of sex development: A qualitative study of early parental experience

    Halley P Crissman;Lauren Warner;Melissa Gardner;Meagan Carr

  • Psychological aspects of the treatment of patients with Disorders of Sex Development

    David E. Sandberg;Melissa Gardner;Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis

  • Height and social adjustment: are extremes a cause for concern and action?

    David E. Sandberg;William M. Bukowski;Caroline M. Fung;Robert B. Noll

  • The psychosocial consequences of short stature: a review of the evidence.

    David E. Sandberg;Linda D. Voss

  • Growth Hormone Treatment of Short Stature: Status of the Quality of Life Rationale

    David E. Sandberg;Melissa Colsman

  • Pharmacological analysis of analgesia and self-stimulation elicited by electrical stimulation of catecholamine nuclei in the rat brain.

    David E. Sandberg;Menahem Segal

  • Effects of ultrasound feedback on pregnancy anxiety, fetal activity, and neonatal outcome.

    Tiffany Field;David Sandberg;Thomas A. Quetel;Robert Garcia

  • Targeted massively parallel sequencing provides comprehensive genetic diagnosis for patients with disorders of sex development

    VA Arboleda;H Lee;FJ Sánchez;EC Délot

  • The Child Behavior Checklist nonclinical standardization samples: should they be utilized as norms?

    David E. Sandberg;Heino F.L. Meyer-Bahlburg;Thomas J. Yager

  • Assessment of health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in children and adolescents with growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature - part 1: a critical evaluation of available tools.

    Anna Levke Brütt;David E. Sandberg;John Chaplin;Hartmut Wollmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg
Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg Columbia University
Eric Vilain
Eric Vilain George Washington University
John E. Vena
John E. Vena Medical University of South Carolina
Vin Tangpricha
Vin Tangpricha Emory University
Stefan Timmermans
Stefan Timmermans University of California, Los Angeles
Sheri A. Berenbaum
Sheri A. Berenbaum Pennsylvania State University
Anke A. Ehrhardt
Anke A. Ehrhardt Columbia University
Tiffany Field
Tiffany Field University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, including social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students choose online programs for their flexibility and accessibility, which can support a smooth path to licensure and specialization.

The journey to becoming a licensed social worker varies by state, with unique education and training requirements. In Massachusetts, you can find specific requirements to be a social worker in Massachusetts that detail the academic paths and practical experience needed. Similarly, Michigan offers information on Michigan social work education requirements for those wishing to practice there.

Looking at the Midwest, students can review how to become a social worker in Minnesota, where the process might include different accreditation standards and supervised field work. Meanwhile, aspiring professionals can also learn about Mississippi social work education requirements, which outline state-specific licensing options.

Whether you’re pursuing psychology or branching into social work, understanding these diverse educational pathways can help you plan your academic and professional future successfully.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Sandberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles