World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

John E. Vena publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Vena sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John E. Vena D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Vena sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Vena is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Environmental Science, with a focus on the subfields of Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Plant Science, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research covers a range of topics including:

  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts

Frequently, John E. Vena collaborates with coauthors such as Roger Newman, Kelly J. Hunt, Michael S. Bloom, Pamela L. Ferguson, and Daniel Skupski.

The scientist's work is published in several established venues, including:

  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Environmental Research
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Selected recent papers reflect the diversity of their research interests and include:

  • "Reproductive Health Risks Associated with Occupational and Environmental Exposure to Pesticides" (2021), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Association of Accelerometer-Measured Sedentary Time and Physical Activity With Risk of Stroke Among US Adults" (2022), JAMA Network Open
  • "Association between gestational PFAS exposure and Children's adiposity in a diverse population" (2021), Environmental Research
  • "US Childhood Asthma Incidence Rate Patterns From the ECHO Consortium to Identify High-risk Groups for Primary Prevention" (2021), JAMA Pediatrics
  • "Exploring associations between prenatal exposure to multiple endocrine disruptors and birth weight with exposure continuum mapping" (2021), Environmental Research

Best Publications

  • Manganese Superoxide Dismutase (MnSOD) Genetic Polymorphisms, Dietary Antioxidants, and Risk of Breast Cancer

    Christine B. Ambrosone;Jo L. Freudenheim;Patricia A. Thompson;Elise Bowman

  • Patterns of sedentary behavior and mortality in U.S. middle-aged and older adults a national cohort study

    Keith M. Diaz;Virginia J. Howard;Brent Hutto;Natalie Colabianchi

  • Premenopausal Breast Cancer Risk and Intake of Vegetables, Fruits, and Related Nutrients

    Jo L. Freudenheim;James R. Marshall;John E. Vena;Rosemary Laughlin

  • Cigarette Smoking, N-Acetyltransferase 2 Genetic Polymorphisms, and Breast Cancer Risk

    Christine B. Ambrosone;Jo L. Freudenheim;Saxon Graham;James R. Marshall

  • Association of a dietary inflammatory index with inflammatory indices and metabolic syndrome among police officers.

    Michael D. Wirth;James Burch;Nitin Shivappa;John M. Violanti

  • Nutritional epidemiology of postmenopausal breast cancer in western New York.

    Saxon Graham;Rosemary Hellmann;James Marshall;Jo Freudenheim

  • Cytochrome P4501A1 and glutathione S-transferase (M1) genetic polymorphisms and postmenopausal breast cancer risk.

    Christine B. Ambrosone;Jo L. Freudenheim;Saxon Graham;James R. Marshall

  • LIFETIME OCCUPATIONAL EXERCISE AND COLON CANCER

    John E. Vena;Saxon Graham;Maria Zielezny;Mya K. Swanson

  • Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.

    Matthew R. Bonner;Daikwon Han;Jing Nie;Peter Rogerson

  • Genetic Polymorphisms in Catechol-O-Methyltransferase, Menopausal Status, and Breast Cancer Risk

    Patricia A. Thompson;Peter G. Shields;Jo L. Freudenheim;Angie Stone

  • Differences in the carcinogenic evaluation of glyphosate between the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

    Christopher J. Portier;Bruce K Armstrong;Bruce C Baguley;Xaver Baur

  • Environmental organochlorine exposure and postmenopausal breast cancer risk.

    Kirsten B. Moysich;Christine B. Ambrosone;John E. Vena;Peter G. Shields

  • The Buffalo Cardio-Metabolic Occupational Police Stress (BCOPS) Pilot Study: Methods and Participant Characteristics

    John M. Violanti;Cecil M. Burchfiel;Diane B. Miller;Michael E. Andrew

  • Breast cancer risk and exposure in early life to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using total suspended particulates as a proxy measure.

    Matthew R Bonner;Daikwon Han;Jing Nie;Peter Rogerson

  • ALLERGY-RELATED DISEASES AND CANCER: AN INVERSE ASSOCIATION

    John E. Vena;Joseph R. Bona;Tim E. Byers;Elliott Middleton

  • Occupational exercise and risk of cancer.

    J E Vena;S Graham;M Zielezny;J Brasure

  • Menstrual cycle characteristics and the risk of endometriosis.

    Sherri L. Darrow;John E. Vena;Ronald E. Batt;Maria A. Zielezny

  • Polychlorinated biphenyls, cytochrome P4501A1 polymorphism, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk

    Kirsten B. Moysich;Peter G. Shields;Jo L. Freudenheim;Enrique F. Schisterman

  • Exposure to dioxin and nonneoplastic mortality in the expanded IARC international cohort study of phenoxy herbicide and chlorophenol production workers and sprayers

    J Vena;P Boffetta;H Becher;T Benn

  • Circadian disrupting exposures and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

    Chunla He;Sonia Taj Anand;Mark H. Ebell;John E. Vena

Frequent Co-Authors

Jo L. Freudenheim
Jo L. Freudenheim University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Saxon Graham
Saxon Graham University at Buffalo, State University of New York
James R. Marshall
James R. Marshall Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Steven N. Blair
Steven N. Blair University of South Carolina
Peter G. Shields
Peter G. Shields The Ohio State University
Christine B. Ambrosone
Christine B. Ambrosone Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Peter A. Rogerson
Peter A. Rogerson University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Paola Muti
Paola Muti University of Milan
Virginia J. Howard
Virginia J. Howard University of Alabama at Birmingham
John M. Violanti
John M. Violanti University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional route. There are now a variety of online RN-BSN programs without clinicals available for nurses who wish to advance their careers with greater flexibility and fewer in-person requirements.

For those looking to move up quickly, consider a 1 year DNP program online. These fast-track options can help you achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in less time, though you should weigh the program intensity and your personal commitments.

Cost is another major factor when choosing further study. If budget is a concern, researching the cheapest DNP program options can help you find an accredited pathway that won’t break the bank.

If you’re starting out in nursing, LPN programs offer a quicker route into the healthcare workforce. These programs are ideal for those eager to begin their medical careers and gain hands-on experience sooner.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Vena

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles