World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
27704
World Ranking
12270
National Ranking
6284

Saxon Graham publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saxon Graham sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 202 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Saxon Graham D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saxon Graham sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Saxon Graham was affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to academic research as a scientist associated with this institution.

The available data does not list specific publications, co-authors, or main fields of study, which limits the detailed overview of their research topics and scientific contributions. There are no recent papers, book publications, or information about frequent publication venues recorded.

No awards or recognitions were documented for Saxon Graham. Their scholarly footprint, as captured in the available records, does not include detailed information on research areas, topics, or collaborations.

The absence of documented publications and research topics suggests that either the records are incomplete or their work was not captured in the sources accessed. Saxon Graham is noted as deceased, and this profile reflects a concise summary based on the limited data available.

Best Publications

  • Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies.

    S. Smith-Warner;D. Spiegelman;S. Yaun;P. Van Den Brandt

  • Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies on Height, Weight, and Breast Cancer Risk

    Piet A. Van Den Brandt;Donna Spiegelman;Shiaw Shyuan Yaun;Hans Olov Adami

  • Cohort studies of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer--a pooled analysis.

    David J. Hunter;Donna Spiegelman;Hans Olov Adami;Lawrence Beeson

  • Alcohol intake and colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 8 cohort studies.

    Eunyoung Cho;Stephanie A. Smith-Warner;John Ritz;Piet A. Van Den Brandt

  • Dairy foods, calcium, and colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 10 cohort studies.

    Eunyoung Cho;Stephanie A. Smith-Warner;Stephanie A. Smith-Warner;Donna Spiegelman;W. Lawrence Beeson

  • Dietary fiber intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies.

    Yikyung Park;Yikyung Park;David J. Hunter;Donna Spiegelman;Leif Bergkvist

  • Intake of Fruits and Vegetables and Risk of Breast Cancer A Pooled Analysis of Cohort Studies

    Stephanie A. Smith-Warner;Donna Spiegelman;Shiaw Shyuan Yaun;Hans Olov Adami

  • Diet in the Epidemiology of Cancer of the Colon and Rectum

    Saxon Graham;Hari Dayal;Mya Swanson;Arnold Mittelman

  • Manganese Superoxide Dismutase (MnSOD) Genetic Polymorphisms, Dietary Antioxidants, and Risk of Breast Cancer

    Christine B. Ambrosone;Jo L. Freudenheim;Patricia A. Thompson;Elise Bowman

  • Premenopausal Breast Cancer Risk and Intake of Vegetables, Fruits, and Related Nutrients

    Jo L. Freudenheim;James R. Marshall;John E. Vena;Rosemary Laughlin

  • Cigarette Smoking, N-Acetyltransferase 2 Genetic Polymorphisms, and Breast Cancer Risk

    Christine B. Ambrosone;Jo L. Freudenheim;Saxon Graham;James R. Marshall

  • Dentition, diet, tobacco, and alcohol in the epidemiology of oral cancer.

    Saxon Graham;Hari Dayal;Thomas Rohrer;Mya Swanson

  • Diet in the Epidemiology of Carcinoma of the Prostate Gland

    S Graham;B Haughey;J Marshall;R Priore

  • Types of dietary fat and breast cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies

    Stephanie A. Smith-Warner;Donna Spiegelman;Hans-Olov Adami;W. Lawrence Beeson;W. Lawrence Beeson

  • Folate Intake and Carcinogenesis of the Colon and Rectum

    Jo L Freudenheim;Saxon Graham;James R Marshall;Brenda P Haughey

  • Methods for pooling results of epidemiologic studies: The pooling project of prospective studies of diet and cancer

    Stephanie A. Smith-Warner;Donna Spiegelman;John Ritz;Demetrius Albanes

  • Nutritional epidemiology of postmenopausal breast cancer in western New York.

    Saxon Graham;Rosemary Hellmann;James Marshall;Jo Freudenheim

  • Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies

    Stacey A Missmer;Stephanie A Smith-Warner;Donna Spiegelman;Shiaw-Shyuan Yaun

  • Cytochrome P4501A1 and glutathione S-transferase (M1) genetic polymorphisms and postmenopausal breast cancer risk.

    Christine B. Ambrosone;Jo L. Freudenheim;Saxon Graham;James R. Marshall

  • Alcohol Intake and Colorectal Cancer

    Eunyoung Cho;Stephanie A. Smith-Warner;John Ritz;Piet A. Van Den Brandt

Frequent Co-Authors

Jo L. Freudenheim
Jo L. Freudenheim University at Buffalo, State University of New York
James R. Marshall
James R. Marshall Roswell Park Cancer Institute
John E. Vena
John E. Vena Medical University of South Carolina
Walter C. Willett
Walter C. Willett Harvard University
David J. Hunter
David J. Hunter Harvard University
Donna Spiegelman
Donna Spiegelman Yale University
Peter G. Shields
Peter G. Shields The Ohio State University
Christine B. Ambrosone
Christine B. Ambrosone Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Piet A. van den Brandt
Piet A. van den Brandt Maastricht University
Alicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in alternative routes within the medical field, there are a variety of flexible, accessible online programs available. For those new to nursing, online adn programs for non nurses offer a way to begin nursing studies even without prior nursing experience. Many of these programs are designed for career changers or those seeking to qualify for entry-level nursing roles.

Administrative paths, like medical billing and coding, are also gaining popularity. Numerous online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa exist, helping students manage program costs while pursuing essential healthcare office careers.

If standardized tests are a barrier, consider nursing school that does not require teas test. These programs can be ideal for motivated students seeking a more streamlined application process.

For those seeking to advance rapidly, accelerated healthcare programs online can lead to leadership opportunities in healthcare administration—often in less time than traditional tracks.

Best Scientists Citing Saxon Graham

Recently Published Articles