World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert M. Stelmack

Robert M. Stelmack

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
3659
World Ranking
9985
National Ranking
691

Robert M. Stelmack publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Stelmack sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert M. Stelmack D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Stelmack sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert M. Stelmack was affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada during their academic career. They contributed to the scientific community through research and teaching under this institution.

Despite the lack of recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues, Stelmack's academic footprint remains linked to their primary affiliation. No titles of papers or specific fields of study are available to detail their research topics, methodologies, or findings.

There are no documented book publications or awards attributed to Stelmack in the provided data. Likewise, there are no main or subfields of study or main topics of work listed that could further outline their scientific interests and expertise.

Robert M. Stelmack is noted as deceased. This information frames the overview of their career and impact as belonging to completed academic contributions rather than ongoing research or scholarly activities.

Best Publications

  • Biological bases of extraversion: psychophysiological evidence.

    Robert M. Stelmack

  • Galen and the humour theory of temperament

    Robert M. Stelmack;Anastasios Stalikas

  • Event-related potentials and recognition memory for pictures and words: the effects of intentional and incidental learning.

    Nancy E. Noldy;Robert M. Stelmack;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time.

    Cynthia Doucet;Robert M. Stelmack

  • Intelligence, reaction time, and event-related potentials

    Patricia A. McGarry-Roberts;Robert M. Stelmack;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • The Psychophysiology of Extraversion and Neuroticism

    Unknown

  • Personality, reaction time, and event-related potentials.

    Robert M. Stelmack;Michael Houlihan;Patricia A. McGarry-Roberts

  • The neuropsychology and psychophysiology of human intelligence

    Philip A. Vernon;John C. Wickett;P. Gordon Bazana;Robert M. Stelmack

  • Intelligence and the effects of perceptual processing demands, task difficulty and processing speed on P300, reaction time and movement time

    Michael Houlihan;Robert Stelmack;Kenneth Campbell

  • The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.

    Alexandra Muller-Gass;Robert M. Stelmack;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Recognition memory for words and event-related potentials: a comparison of normal and disabled readers.

    Robert M. Stelmack;Brenda J. Saxe;Nancy Noldy-cullum;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Extraversion and individual differences in auditory evoked response.

    Robert M. Stelmack;Edwin Achorn;Aurelda Michaud

  • Extraversion and the effects of frequency and intensity on the auditory brainstem evoked response

    Robert M. Stelmack;Keith G. Wilson

  • A personality profile of Mount Everest climbers

    Sean Egan;Robert M Stelmack

  • The effect of picture priming on event-related potentials of normal and disabled readers during a word recognition memory task.

    Robert M. Stelmack;Jennifer Miles

  • Intelligence and information processing during an auditory discrimination task with backward masking: an event-related potential analysis.

    P Gordon Bazana;Robert M Stelmack

  • Movement time differentiates extraverts from introverts

    Cynthia Doucet;Robert M. Stelmack

  • Extraversion, sensation seeking and electrodermal response: Probing a paradox

    Robert M. Stelmack;Louise Plouffe;Wilfried Falkenberg

  • An event-related potential analysis of extraversion and individual differences in cognitive processing speed and response execution.

    Cynthia Doucet;Robert M. Stelmack

  • Extraversion and Auditory Sensitivity to High and Low Frequency

    Robert M. Stelmack;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Introversion-extraversion: the Bell-Magendie law revisited

    Robert M. Stelmack;Louise Plouffe

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth B. Campbell
Kenneth B. Campbell University of Ottawa
Byron P. Rourke
Byron P. Rourke University of Windsor
Verner Knott
Verner Knott University of Ottawa
Philip A. Vernon
Philip A. Vernon University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology can open up a range of specialized career options in the USA—many of which can be pursued fully or partially online. One increasingly popular pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a credential that allows professionals to work with individuals with behavioral challenges, including those diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders.

Each state has specific steps for certification. For example, becoming a bcba in Cleveland requires completing requisite coursework and supervised fieldwork, followed by passing the BCBA exam. Similarly, the process for becoming a bcba in Colorado Springs involves meeting Colorado requirements and choosing from universities that offer accredited online programs.

If you are considering Ohio, find out more about Columbus bcba requirements, including the need for practical experience and state-specific licensure. For those interested in Texas, review how to become a bcba in Corpus Christi to explore university program options and exam guidelines.

Online psychology and BCBA programs provide flexible learning options, helping students balance education with work or family commitments. Explore these pathways to find the best fit for your career goals in behavioral health and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Stelmack

Recently Published Articles